Who here besides me thinks this is going to suck?

Excuse me, some of us here actually know the man and don't like seeing him threatened like this.

Grow up, threatening physical violence over something as petty as this is immature and should be left in Third Grade.

Uh, this has been happening all day to me. I'm sorry. I guess my sarcasm doesn't come out very easily in my words. My bad.

:bow:

(In case you're wondering, the smiley above me is representative of me bowing down to you in apology. Once again, by bad!)

EDIT: You're probably gossiping about me right now and haven't even seen my apology yet. Well, if anything good came out of this, at least Mr. Weisman said my name. (Okay, yes, technically it's just my username, but it's pretty damn close to my name to I'm counting it!)
 
Spider-Man 3 was faithful to the comics?? Did we see the same movie. Last time I checked Harry became the Green Goblin, not this New Goblin bulls**t. I also don't remember Sandman being linked to Ben's murder, and I don't ever recall Venom being killed off by a pumpkin bomb. Oh, and wasn't there something called the Secret Wars that was responsible for the symbiote? In Spider-Man 3 it just happened to rocket to Earth unnoticed by anyone and land right next to Peter Parker who just happens to be a super powered hero.

Hmmmm....using Spider-Man 3 as an example for ANY discussion that has the word "faithful" in it is a poor choice in my opinion.

The Joker in TDK looks f**king fantastic. Having a guy fall into a vat of acid (which would melt your skin not to mention kill you almost instantly) and have him emerge with bleached skin and a permanent smile is absurd. This is 2008 not 1988, people are smarter and they expect more.

I said there were changes made in Spider-Man 3---sorry I didn't get into specifics as you did. Yeesh.
 
Calm yourselves, before I kick you both in your faithful asses.

You people have your heads to far into the funny books, if you don't want something different, movie or cartoons, then stick with the comics by not watching it. Batman and Spider-Man films are absurd, it's just fanboys are the only idiots that try to justify its absurdity. :dry:
 
i havent ready any of this, except the first page... excuse me for that please...
however, i think this will suck aswell...

i name a few reasons:
aimed at kids. the 90ys show was aimed at kids aswell, and while htere wre soem great episodes, the best ones were when spidey was about being an adult. the kids stories sucked. all of them.

greg wiseman. i love what he did on gargoyles, but that was also his baby. and except the batman, i havent watched anything from him, but the batman sucks. the villians are written porly, without any motivation whatsoever and batman is written liek he has no clue whatsoever.

the character design. i hate the modern cartoons character designs. why cant they just quit with this "it needs to be hip and anime like" attitude. give me my good designs back. compare that to the designs from the 90ys show. sure, they had some terrible deisgn choices back then, but at least the style was okay. i dont want my spider-man looking like a wisecracking 10 year old with a balloon as a head, thin like having bulemia. the girls also look like anorexia patients...

the premise. adapting classic comics with a twist of new into 26 stand allone episodes. seen that, done that, next. why dont they just focus on making a good show instead reusing the same plots over and over again?

the vocies and music. from what i heard and saw thus far, they will suck. spidey sounds like on crack, and the music is that strange mix between get lost and **** of synthie crap. at least its better than the mtv show music...


those are of course only my personal thoughts. i will watch the show, and who knows, maybe i am wrong? i was wrong TWICE already, both times including spider-man (feature knows) so maybe i am wrong a third time?
 
i havent ready any of this, except the first page... excuse me for that please...
however, i think this will suck aswell...

i name a few reasons:
aimed at kids. the 90ys show was aimed at kids aswell, and while htere wre soem great episodes, the best ones were when spidey was about being an adult. the kids stories sucked. all of them.

greg wiseman. i love what he did on gargoyles, but that was also his baby. and except the batman, i havent watched anything from him, but the batman sucks. the villians are written porly, without any motivation whatsoever and batman is written liek he has no clue whatsoever.


the character design. i hate the modern cartoons character designs. why cant they just quit with this "it needs to be hip and anime like" attitude. give me my good designs back. compare that to the designs from the 90ys show. sure, they had some terrible deisgn choices back then, but at least the style was okay. i dont want my spider-man looking like a wisecracking 10 year old with a balloon as a head, thin like having bulemia. the girls also look like anorexia patients...

the premise. adapting classic comics with a twist of new into 26 stand allone episodes. seen that, done that, next. why dont they just focus on making a good show instead reusing the same plots over and over again?

the vocies and music. from what i heard and saw thus far, they will suck. spidey sounds like on crack, and the music is that strange mix between get lost and **** of synthie crap. at least its better than the mtv show music...


those are of course only my personal thoughts. i will watch the show, and who knows, maybe i am wrong? i was wrong TWICE already, both times including spider-man (feature knows) so maybe i am wrong a third time?
He wrote like 7 episodes of The Batman and those few eps are thought of as some of the best in the whole series. For example...

Artifacts(Personal Favorite): http://www.tv.com/the-batman/artifacts/episode/869514/summary.html?tag=ep_list;ep_title;6
Score: 9.5 Superb 90 votes

The Everywhere man:http://www.tv.com/the-batman/the-everywhere-man/episode/869511/summary.html?tag=ep_list;ep_title;3
Score: 9.3 Superb 75 votes

The Rubberface of Comedy(Personal Favorite):http://www.tv.com/the-batman/the-rubberface-of-comedy-1/episode/390099/summary.html
Score: 8.8 Great 108 votes

The Big Chill( I agree this wasn't his best but hey, not everything can be perfect): http://www.tv.com/the-batman/the-big-chill/episode/366296/summary.html
Score: 8.1 Great 106 votes

Strange Minds: http://www.tv.com/the-batman/strange-minds/episode/415725/summary.html
Score: 9.2 Superb 84 votes

Clayface of Tragedy( another personal favorite): http://www.tv.com/the-batman/clayface-of-tragedy-2/episode/392610/summary.html
Score: 9.0 Superb 107 votes

Meltdown: http://www.tv.com/the-batman/meltdown/episode/415123/summary.html
Score: 8.9 Great 96 votes

Like I said on The Batman he has only done these 7 episodes and all of them were from good-excellent. So he should not be the one to blame for The Batman's lack in success.

So you want cool designs like this?
1.jpg


Yeah, well then the cartoon's animation will be as slow as...
turtle640.jpg


Nuff said :o and I disagree it doesn't look like anime but that discussion's for another day.

They are reusing the exact same plots? When did they say that? There goal is to take things and make Peter a 16 year old in high school which has NEVER been done in animated form,yet. That's the whole reason they decided to to do it, so then he isn't in college like the rest of TAS out there.

The voices and music is your own issue. Someone's stuck in the 90's :whatever:

Just wait until you watch the show, that's all I can do for ya...





 
In Spider-Man's case the biggest liberty they took was switching from web-shooters to organics. Once again geeks (I use that as a term of endearment) were up in arms that this change was not only going to ruin the movie, but was going to ruin the character itself. 5-6 years after the first Spider-Man movie was released, barely anyone even brings it up anymore. Why? Because it made sense in the context of the movie.

Anything can make sense in the context of a scene in a film that the scriptwriter created. E.g.- In Spider-Man 2002- Peter gets bitten by a genetically modified Spider which grants him his powers. This makes sense because he was viewing genetically modified spiders as apposed to a demonstration in radiology where in by chance a spider becomes irradiated and then bites him. People don't bring up the movie organics anymore because it's old news, it was that or nothing, fans came to terms with it. That don't mean it was not a bad decision. It was.

Now you go to the Joker. A sadistic man who dresses up like a clown and is dead set on causing anarchy all over Gotham. Sounds pretty absurd to me, but even still should all logic be thrown out because we're dealing with a "fantasy movie"? Hardly.

I never said 'all logic should be thrown out', they are your words.
In order to try and diffuse my argument and validate yours, you over exaggerate an aspect of something I touched upon to make my outlook seem misguided. It's a common angle taken by posters on here, either that or you genuinely mis interpreted some issues I highlighted. Superhero comics are fantastical,- but still logical in terms of interactions between characters.

Look at how Bruce Wayne became Batman in "Batman Begins" he didn't lock Alfred in the cave and say "make me a suit" instead he used bits and pieces of technology from Wayne Enterprises as the basis of the Bat-suit. Last time I checked this was a MAJOR deviation from the original story....but people didn't seem to mind. Why? because it MADE SENSE. It was FAR more realistic for Bruce to incorporate things already made from Wayne Enterprises into his design for what would become the Bat-suit. Same thing can be said of the car. In the comics doesn't he create every single interpretation of the Batmobile? In "Batman Begins" he takes the Tumbler and modifies it...because it makes sense.

Sure it made sense for Bruce to use WE backlog of military suits and weaponry, but it would have made just as much sense for him to out source and pick the stuff up some other way and design/craft the suit with Alfred. I'm not saying there was anything wrong with the way it was done in the film. How he got his Bat suit / weapons is not that important, the fact that he has them is.
It's a crucial part of his identity. Just like However the Joker might have fallen into an acid bath in different versions of Batman over the years- that bit is not important. What is important is that he has bleached skin. His bleached white skin is a crucial part of his identity. It's not something he can take off, that's who he is.

I think in that respect, his bleached skin is like a mirrored version of Batman's costume.
Batman's costume is not really a suit he dons- it's who he really is, he has no choice- He is Batman. Bruce Wayne is the costume.
In the same way- the Joker has no point of consideration either- his bleached white skin symbolizes his totalitarian view on the world.
He is the Joker- 100% nut job psycho and it cannot be wiped away like make up.

Now you get geeks already complaining about the Joker because he isn't "permawhite" who cares?

Like I said- about half of the Bat-fans on these boards.
A good percentage of which are hardcore fans.
Obviously FOR YOU it is not a big deal, but that does not mean that it is not a big deal.

Does it mean the Joker isn't going to be sick, sadistic, and twisted? Hardly. In my opinion it makes him MORE sick, sadistic, and twisted because he has to sit there and put that on himself...thus adding to the fact that he's a few crayons short of a full box.

No it just means they missed the point in one aspect of the Joker.
There is nothing sick or sadistic about putting on make up. Heck every dumbass teen goth does it.
As the Joker is intended to be- Permawhite- Now that, is damn freaky and scary too.

I look at it like this. "Permawhite" Joker's skin is white all over, so it's like "hey, my skin is white like a clown, might as well play the part."

Well, you are looking at him wrong.
Joker is a psychopath, simple as.
Their is no consideration on his part about the way he is verses established normality.
He can only be one way.
His permawhite skin is just a really creepy and unique way of representing this visually.

TDK's Joker has to apply the make-up by himself, thus he makes the decision to look like that (except for the chelsea grin which I think is genius).

It's in the same vein of Bruce Wayne making the decision to become Batman and continue on doing what he does knowing that at any given time he could be killed.

Putting make up on is a similar decision to the choice Batman makes to fight crime?
No, the bleached skin is the perfect mirror to Batman as I have previously explained.
For neither of them is it a choice, it is who they are.

Joker making the decision to turn his face into a disgusting clown is FAR more chilling than a Joker who basically has no choice.

Like I said earlier- Joker's state of mind is just set one way.
It's not like he has choice or not, it's just who he is.
The bleached skin is the perfect visual representation of this- it is bizarre and freaky as hell- like him, and it is permanent.

Read up on serial killers and mass murders and you'll find that the majority of them killed out of a compulsion, like something was forcing them to do it, but it was their DECISION in how to commit the murders that is really frightening.

Sure, how they choose to kill someone is interesting, but it is beside the point.
The point is- they kill, and that is all, nothing else.
That's the interesting part for me- the way their brains work.
They are on a setting that we can't comprehend.
Joker's bleached skin is a great visual metaphor for this.

The whole "it's a comic book movie!" argument has never made sense to me at all. It's like saying "just because it's a comic book movie we should excuse all of the realism and logic" which is BS.

No it's not like saying that, it's like saying- 'because it's a comic book movie I think we should stick to the things that define these characters.'

Saying a movie "would have been" so much better simply because the main villain's skin is bleached white (by acid no less) is pretty absurd. You haven't even seen the movie, or Ledger's performance, yet you're already condemning it because the character's history isn't 100% ripped from the comics. Sounds like a case of judging a book by it's cover if you ask me.

I'm not judging the film- I think the it will be great- look at my sig. However the fact remains that since this version of the Joker is missing his signature bleached white skin, he is already inferior in one way to all previous live action incarnations. Get it right.

But here's the REALITY of the situation. No matter what you do, or how faithful you are to the comic books people will ALWAYS find something wrong with it.

That's a pretty generalized and worthless comment.
FACT IS- making Joker non permawhite is a pretty damn big deviation from the source. Sure it does not change his personality, but the uniqueness and creepiness of him having bleached white skin is integral to his visual identity, even more so than the purple suits, and it is also a great metaphor for his state of mind- like Batman he is locked onto one path and there is no escape. It is a compulsion to do what he does, and there is no way he could be anything else. It is not a mask that paints onto his face, that can sweat off.

And my argument with Spider-Man 3 wasn't that it wasn't faithful because quite frankly the whole "Secret Wars" thing just wouldn't work in a Spider-Man movie.

It actually would if we got a Spider-Man film that dropped us into the film mid way through Spidey's career and then the Secret War was referred to through flashbacks over a short period of time to recount how the symbiote was brought back to Earth.
 
Anything can make sense in the context of a scene in a film that the scriptwriter created. E.g.- In Spider-Man 2002- Peter gets bitten by a genetically modified Spider which grants him his powers. This makes sense because he was viewing genetically modified spiders as apposed to a demonstration in radiology where in by chance a spider becomes irradiated and then bites him. People don't bring up the movie organics anymore because it's old news, it was that or nothing, fans came to terms with it. That don't mean it was not a bad decision. It was.



I never said 'all logic should be thrown out', they are your words.
In order to try and diffuse my argument and validate yours, you over exaggerate an aspect of something I touched upon to make my outlook seem misguided. It's a common angle taken by posters on here, either that or you genuinely mis interpreted some issues I highlighted. Superhero comics are fantastical,- but still logical in terms of interactions between characters.



Sure it made sense for Bruce to use WE backlog of military suits and weaponry, but it would have made just as much sense for him to out source and pick the stuff up some other way and design/craft the suit with Alfred. I'm not saying there was anything wrong with the way it was done in the film. How he got his Bat suit / weapons is not that important, the fact that he has them is.
It's a crucial part of his identity. Just like However the Joker might have fallen into an acid bath in different versions of Batman over the years- that bit is not important. What is important is that he has bleached skin. His bleached white skin is a crucial part of his identity. It's not something he can take off, that's who he is.

I think in that respect, his bleached skin is like a mirrored version of Batman's costume.
Batman's costume is not really a suit he dons- it's who he really is, he has no choice- He is Batman. Bruce Wayne is the costume.
In the same way- the Joker has no point of consideration either- his bleached white skin symbolizes his totalitarian view on the world.
He is the Joker- 100% nut job psycho and it cannot be wiped away like make up.



Like I said- about half of the Bat-fans on these boards.
A good percentage of which are hardcore fans.
Obviously FOR YOU it is not a big deal, but that does not mean that it is not a big deal.



No it just means they missed the point in one aspect of the Joker.
There is nothing sick or sadistic about putting on make up. Heck every dumbass teen goth does it.
As the Joker is intended to be- Permawhite- Now that, is damn freaky and scary too.



Well, you are looking at him wrong.
Joker is a psychopath, simple as.
Their is no consideration on his part about the way he is verses established normality.
He can only be one way.
His permawhite skin is just a really creepy and unique way of representing this visually.



Putting make up on is a similar decision to the choice Batman makes to fight crime?
No, the bleached skin is the perfect mirror to Batman as I have previously explained.
For neither of them is it a choice, it is who they are.



Like I said earlier- Joker's state of mind is just set one way.
It's not like he has choice or not, it's just who he is.
The bleached skin is the perfect visual representation of this- it is bizarre and freaky as hell- like him, and it is permanent.



Sure, how they choose to kill someone is interesting, but it is beside the point.
The point is- they kill, and that is all, nothing else.
That's the interesting part for me- the way their brains work.
They are on a setting that we can't comprehend.
Joker's bleached skin is a great visual metaphor for this.



No it's not like saying that, it's like saying- 'because it's a comic book movie I think we should stick to the things that define these characters.'



I'm not judging the film- I think the it will be great- look at my sig. However the fact remains that since this version of the Joker is missing his signature bleached white skin, he is already inferior in one way to all previous live action incarnations. Get it right.



That's a pretty generalized and worthless comment.
FACT IS- making Joker non permawhite is a pretty damn big deviation from the source. Sure it does not change his personality, but the uniqueness and creepiness of him having bleached white skin is integral to his visual identity, even more so than the purple suits, and it is also a great metaphor for his state of mind- like Batman he is locked onto one path and there is no escape. It is a compulsion to do what he does, and there is no way he could be anything else. It is not a mask that paints onto his face, that can sweat off.



It actually would if we got a Spider-Man film that dropped us into the film mid way through Spidey's career and then the Secret War was referred to through flashbacks over a short period of time to recount how the symbiote was brought back to Earth.


The only thing that would have accomplished, is completely confusing the mainstream audience...
 
I don't like the character designs and it's just a Saturday morning cartoon for kids so my hopes are not high. But hopefully, it won't be bad.
 
The only thing that would have accomplished, is completely confusing the mainstream audience...

The symbiote scenario?
Sure in the context of the current Spidey film series.

That don't mean it would not be possible to introduce the symbiote in A Spider-Man film via flash backs dealing with a Secret War that happened between films.
 
I like the character designs, I think they're cool and I like the style. The voice of Spider-Man has grown on me and I love all the footage we're seeing Spider-Man looking cool swinging through the streets of New York. AND IT'S ALL ANIMATED. Remember how lazy the 90s one was with animating the streets around spider-man and spider-man himself? Now we get it all animated and it looks fantastic. I like the designs and I think it'll be an alright show at the least. If not...I'll go do something else...
 
i havent ready any of this, except the first page... excuse me for that please...
however, i think this will suck aswell...

i name a few reasons:
aimed at kids. the 90ys show was aimed at kids aswell, and while htere wre soem great episodes, the best ones were when spidey was about being an adult. the kids stories sucked. all of them.

greg wiseman. i love what he did on gargoyles, but that was also his baby. and except the batman, i havent watched anything from him, but the batman sucks. the villians are written porly, without any motivation whatsoever and batman is written liek he has no clue whatsoever.

the character design. i hate the modern cartoons character designs. why cant they just quit with this "it needs to be hip and anime like" attitude. give me my good designs back. compare that to the designs from the 90ys show. sure, they had some terrible deisgn choices back then, but at least the style was okay. i dont want my spider-man looking like a wisecracking 10 year old with a balloon as a head, thin like having bulemia. the girls also look like anorexia patients...
quote]

Glad we agree.
 
I don't understand all this "aimed at kids" negativity. Wasn't the Lee/Ditko stuff and the Lee/Romita stuff aimed at kids? Wasn't the 90's show (which IMO sucked hard after the first season or two) aimed at kids? What about the Batman, Superman, and JLU cartoons? They were aimed at kids too, right?
 
The symbiote scenario?
Sure in the context of the current Spidey film series.

That don't mean it would not be possible to introduce the symbiote in A Spider-Man film via flash backs dealing with a Secret War that happened between films.

You're not being realistic. A flashback would invole hiring more actors, designing and producing more character costumes, creating more sets...how much of a budget do you think Sam would have needed for something like that? Also; Most of the characters like X-Men, FF, Hulk, Iron Man etc., are all liscensed out to other movie studios... the Lizard played a prominent role in Secret War, and he hasnt even appeared in the movies yet!

There was no way Secret Wars was ever going to happen. If that's the reason you say SM3 "sucked" then no offense, but you have no idea what producing a movie is all about.
 
You're not being realistic. A flashback would invole hiring more actors, designing and producing more character costumes, creating more sets...how much of a budget do you think Sam would have needed for something like that? Also; Most of the characters like X-Men, FF, Hulk, Iron Man etc., are all liscensed out to other movie studios... the Lizard played a prominent role in Secret War, and he hasnt even appeared in the movies yet!

There was no way Secret Wars was ever going to happen. If that's the reason you say SM3 "sucked" then no offense, but you have no idea what producing a movie is all about.

Hmmm, it would appear you are TOTALLY missing where I am coming from.

1- I don't think SM3 sucked because SW were not involved, it sucked for all kinds of reasons but Venom's origin not being faithfully reproduced had nothing to do with it.

2- I was contesting a point that a previous poster made about how the SW symbiote origin would not work in the context of a Spider-Man film.
'A Spidey film', he did not say a film in the current Spider-Man film franchise.

I was not talking about the budget, cast etc, or a possible future Spider-Man film's relation to any current Marvel films. I am talking about this only from the point view of script and if it could work. It could be done. Heck, a 10 minute montage, recap or whatever could be made up mostly of CGI shots and Daily Bugle clippings recapping the event.
 
I'm disappointed by the art direction, but nothing else. I think it'll be a solid series, though I'm certain it won't be nearly as well-received as Fox's Spider-Man. Anyways, there are two truths you need to recognize. The first is that this is Spider-Man; you can groan about it, but there are many people who will watch this simply because he's in it. The second is that we'll never see a Spider-Man cartoon aired on Adult Swim. Dark, well-written stories have become a thing of the past. However, making everything campy and child-friendly leads to more $$$. From a business standpoint, this is a smart move for any animation studio.

They may not be pleasant truths, but that's just the way that things are.
 
[/b][/b] Actually, it's not really based off of Ultimate Spider-Man that much. There's only a few things in the show that may have aspects from Ultimate Spider-Man, but overall, the show is defenitley mainly based of of the classic Lee/Ditko and Lee/Romita Issues. :yay:
LOL it's funny cause i actually ment that but i just went ahead and said bassed off of.
 
Hmmm, it would appear you are TOTALLY missing where I am coming from.

1- I don't think SM3 sucked because SW were not involved, it sucked for all kinds of reasons but Venom's origin not being faithfully reproduced had nothing to do with it.

2- I was contesting a point that a previous poster made about how the SW symbiote origin would not work in the context of a Spider-Man film.
'A Spidey film', he did not say a film in the current Spider-Man film franchise.

I was not talking about the budget, cast etc, or a possible future Spider-Man film's relation to any current Marvel films. I am talking about this only from the point view of script and if it could work. It could be done. Heck, a 10 minute montage, recap or whatever could be made up mostly of CGI shots and Daily Bugle clippings recapping the event.


Or, they could keep the storyline running along un-complicated and smoothly, by just having the symbiote land on earth in a meteor.

Oh, wait...:yay:
 
i hope that the symbiote storyline will take more than just one or two episodes, it would be nice to see spidey in the black suit for at least 3 to 4 epsidoes. after he didn't wear it for just one hour or for just two issues in the comics.
 
i hope that the symbiote storyline will take more than just one or two episodes, it would be nice to see spidey in the black suit for at least 3 to 4 epsidoes. after he didn't wear it for just one hour or for just two issues in the comics.
The symbiote arc will span about 4 episodes.
 
Or, they could keep the storyline running along un-complicated and smoothly, by just having the symbiote land on earth in a meteor.

Oh, wait...:yay:

True, but OneDisturbedSOB said it could not be done.
I say it could.. and there ya go, we are on the same page.
 
Ha-- I like that!

'Why did you must spell incorrectly?'

'Why did you must hate new Spider-man cartoon??'

'Hulk smash!!!' :oldrazz:

You can't pick someone up on spelling if you are going to write sentences that are grammatically incorrect. :cwink:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"