The Democrats will obviously win more seats in the Senate, they'll probably lose a few in the House because some of the seats they won in 2006 are naturally Republican (like Mike Foley's district), but they'll win some others to make it up.
That they completely don't deserve victory since they've proven to be as completely ineffective as the Republicans in Congress. Nancy Pelosi is an awful House Speaker and nothing but a partisan hack.
I voted Democrat in 2006 and I won't do so again this year because they don't even deserve my vote. The Republicans haven't changed a bit so they don't deserve my vote either. I'm either going to vote third party or no one in Congress this year.
I did! I'm betting on the upset, stakes are high but the return is HUGE! It's like Bett'n on the horses.I think it's quite obvious that the Democrats will expand their majority.
Who the heck voted for the Republicans? They must not be paying attention!
Yeah, until you realize that Raising the Minimum wage is actually bad for this country and the Unemployment rate actually went UP because of it. Hmm....You gotta give congress a chance. what were you expecting them to accomplish with a razor thin majority in the senate, when you need 60 votes in order for a bill to pass. You also have to consider the fact that Bush is President.
They didn't have the votes necessary to end the Iraq war, repeal the tax cuts, or do anything really.
They did raise the minimum wage, which honestly is probably more than everything republicans did in several years, with a lot more power to do it with.
They don't deserve a chance. They know that they lacked the votes necessary to get their agenda fully passed. They should have attempted to work with the Republican opposition and compromised instead of pathetically bicker with them. They even go on freaking vacation when work is needed to be done. Even worse, we have a partisan hack as Speaker of the House.You gotta give congress a chance. what were you expecting them to accomplish with a razor thin majority in the senate, when you need 60 votes in order for a bill to pass. You also have to consider the fact that Bush is President.
They didn't have the votes necessary to end the Iraq war, repeal the tax cuts, or do anything really.
Which was completely pointless and unnecessary because the states were already doing it on their own and the states that didn't were most likely eventually going to.They did raise the minimum wage, which honestly is probably more than everything republicans did in several years, with a lot more power to do it with.
Yeah!! They should do like the Republicans did, When they was in charge they worked and compromised with the Dems.....They don't deserve a chance. They know that they lacked the votes necessary to get their agenda fully passed. They should have attempted to work with the Republican opposition and compromised instead of pathetically bicker with them. They even go on freaking vacation when work is needed to be done. Even worse, we have a partisan hack as Speaker of the House.
The Democrats will remain in solidly in control of the House, while picking up a few additional ones.
In the Senate, I think Mary Landreiu will hold her seat down in Louisiana. Virginia, New Hampshire, Colorado, and New Mexico are ensured. Alaska and Mississippi are in a good position. Oregon is within reach. MN will depend on whether or not Al Franken can convince people he is a legitament candidate. So I see a 4-7 seat pick-up for the Democrats.
Norm Coleman is one of the worst Senators in Congress, and Al Franken is probably the worst candidates to go up against him... I'm starting to question the collective intelligence of Minnesotans...
I did! I'm betting on the upset, stakes are high but the return is HUGE! It's like Bett'n on the horses.
Yeah!! They should do like the Republicans did, When they was in charge they worked and compromised with the Dems.....
Oh wait that's right, That NEVER happned.
Minnesota should have been a seat the Democrats were guaranteed. But instead they nominated a comedian with the reputation of being an ultra-liberal. That has to be one of the dumbest moves ever. They should have nominated a moderate and enjoy the repeated success of their 2006 strategy in MinnesotaNorm Coleman is one of the worst Senators in Congress, and Al Franken is probably the worst candidates to go up against him... I'm starting to question the collective intelligence of Minnesotans...
i don't know if anyone here likes him at all. at least anyone that i have talked to.Minnesota should have been a seat the Democrats were guaranteed. But instead they nominated a comedian with the reputation of being an ultra-liberal. That has to be one of the dumbest moves ever. They should have nominated a moderate and enjoy the repeated success of their 2006 strategy in Minnesota