You will go to hell to burn for an eternity! You've sent so many of your potential offspring to their doom in a Kleenex. In a way it is a hell for them, instead of burning in flames, they dry up and get crusty.
You will go to hell to burn for an eternity! You've sent so many of your potential offspring to their doom in a Kleenex. In a way it is a hell for them, instead of burning in flames, they dry up and get crusty.
I love a woman with tattoos. Obviously, there's scenarios that go too far (I still like to see some skin and the majority of a face), but I love body modification. I haven't done too much of it myself, but piercings, tattoos, scarification, purple hair. I love all of it, and, I like women who've never done any of it as well.
......
When I first entered this thread, I thought the title and the "moral decay" talk was tongue-in-cheek. I am disturbed that it is not. What a narrow, judgmental, sexist person. That swollen, bloody face tattoo is less unpleasant than that kind of attitude. And while America has much to learn, portentous fire and brimstone invoking of "moral decay" as a bogey man I find quaint and chuckle worthy. Yeah, some body ink can really hold a candle to murder-as-entertainment, to impaling, to crucifixion, to torture as a courtroom prerequisite, to slavery, to genocide. Yeah, America is such a hive scum and villainy because of tattoos, homosexuals, and atheists. Mmmhmm. That's totally reasonable.
I don't mind tattoos to a certain degree. It looks nice on some folks, men or women. Others it doesn't sit right. Same with piercings. If you have some tattoos on the shoulder, back, leg or whatever, it can look nice. If you have piercings on the nose, eyebrow, or elsewhere *ahem* it can still look classy. But if you have half your face with a huge spider or a flaming skull with enough metal to make a tin can then that just grosses me out.
Thinking someone is in "moral decay" because they have tattoos impressively manages to trump sexual orientation for pettiest, shallowest reasons to judge someone's morals.
I have an aunt who thumps her Bible at everyone and says people with tattoos are freaks. She also lies and steals, and dumped her dog by the roadside in the middle of nowhere when it got hold.
I have a female friend who has multiple tattoos and adds more on a regular basis. She is a hard-working, honest, sympathetic person who doesn't lie to or steal from anyone and takes in abandoned dogs, keeps some of them for herself, and helps the others find homes.
The dirty, filthy, morally decaying tattooed freak is leaps and bounds a more respectable individual than Auntie Bible Thumper any day of the week, in my book. There's no question which one I trust more (the latter I don't trust at all).
I'm calling BS on all of this. Just seems way too convenient for the point you are trying to make.
With that said tho
I think it depends on what/where they are. There's a line between tats being WICKED sexy and just not attractive for me. I will say that I rather a female have a few tasteful tats than nothing at all. Same goes for piercings(not meaning the ears).
Thinking tattoos are a sign or moral decay or anything of the like couldn't be more idiotic.
I mean, its a rhetorical question...I know its another sign of country heading towards moral decay and all..but anyone bohtered by seeing woman with a good figure inked up all over her body?
I know a guy who had tattoos, then wised up and regretted it
Tattoos are like a lot of other stuff allowed under the name of freedom, and that so called part of freedom is forbidden by Islam, Allah forbids it, and what our creator forbids, it's a line I must never allow myself to cross, same applies to every human being, without exception
Race, gender, etc, nothing makes a difference, what's forbidden is forbidden
And please, I hope no one use that example of "those who act like they're better than you by obeying laws while ignoring others", and use "the exact opposite" in defense of the wrong, they both do things that are extremely wrong, and both need to be corrected where they are wrong
Yeah, watch this @3:29
"The needle punctures the skin in about a rate of 3,000 times per minute, injecting micro particles of ink, which intermingle with the dermis, the skin's second layer"
Tattoo's destroy the skin, considered decaying or not. The needle penetrates the skin. Only good sking penetrating needle is used to inject vaccines requiring to enter the blood without decomposition through the digestive system to take its effect
If someone you know is cutting him/herself with a blade, what will you do? Allow it? I doubt you will. Difference between this and the thing in discussion is tattoos are scars added by assistance by a pro in that area, and self inflecting damage is it's considered a psychological problem. Why is that wrong done by person to self is an issue, when some are licensed to do that to willing paying costumers?
Unfortunately people are too judgmental and most of us tend to subconsciously stereotype people with tattoos.
I get it. People have their beliefs. But in terms of appearance, I'm not into it. I think it ruins a female body. I hear the whole, "the body is a canvas" thing...but...it's not. Really. It's an organic biological..vessel, that houses our soul, and it is how it is. A woman's body can be a beautiful thing, natural beauty is always better than acquired, I don't a woman's body to be covered in ink, I think it's unattractive
I know a guy who had tattoos, then wised up and regretted it
Tattoos are like a lot of other stuff allowed under the name of freedom, and that so called part of freedom is forbidden by Islam, Allah forbids it, and what our creator forbids, it's a line I must never allow myself to cross, same applies to every human being, without exception
Race, gender, etc, nothing makes a difference, what's forbidden is forbidden
And please, I hope no one use that example of "those who act like they're better than you by obeying laws while ignoring others", and use "the exact opposite" in defense of the wrong, they both do things that are extremely wrong, and both need to be corrected where they are wrong
Yeah, watch this @3:29
"The needle punctures the skin in about a rate of 3,000 times per minute, injecting micro particles of ink, which intermingle with the dermis, the skin's second layer"
Tattoo's destroy the skin, considered decaying or not. The needle penetrates the skin. Only good sking penetrating needle is used to inject vaccines requiring to enter the blood without decomposition through the digestive system to take its effect
If someone you know is cutting him/herself with a blade, what will you do? Allow it? I doubt you will. Difference between this and the thing in discussion is tattoos are scars added by assistance by a pro in that area, and self inflecting damage is it's considered a psychological problem. Why is that wrong done by person to self is an issue, when some are licensed to do that to willing paying costumers?
My religion forbids it, it forbids self inflicting damage, no excuses should be allowed
That video explaining how tattoos are made clarifies it's damaging, and I aim to say people don't like scars, and don't like to see their children or people they know cut themselves, why allow someone to do this to them? Cut them? That is wrong
And I don't want people to defend breaking one rule or more by bringing people against breaking those rules break other rules. One wrong is not more tolerant than another
I'm not "against" women (or anyone I guess) having them, but I do find them unattractive, I have yet to meet a girl I think they look good on. Usually a turn off for me, the women I have seen them on usually look better without them.
Tattoos are like a lot of other stuff allowed under the name of freedom, and that so called part of freedom is forbidden by Islam, Allah forbids it, and what our creator forbids, it's a line I must never allow myself to cross, same applies to every human being, without exception
Good thing I live in a country where I'm not required to do what Allah tells me to do.
"The needle punctures the skin in about a rate of 3,000 times per minute, injecting micro particles of ink, which intermingle with the dermis, the skin's second layer"
Allah made me, made you, and made the very planet you live on and the universe you live in. You know the saying? God's Green Earth? God's Good Earth? God's Earth? This God is Allah, you live on his made Earth, you live by the rules he made for us to live by, you are no exception
You are obliged to learn and do according to what Allah allows. You, me, and everyone are generally the same, same metabolism, same digestive system, same need for nutrition, same need for self cleansing and waste disposal, same need for sleep, etc..
Don't joke about it or try to be a wise-mouth, people did this before and disregarded warning sent to them, now they wish to live again and do what they made fun of like you are doing now, do you need to wait until it's too late to try and make up for your mistakes? No, you don't
Allah made me, made you, and made the very planet you live on and the universe you live in. You know the saying? God's Green Earth? God's Good Earth? God's Earth? This God is Allah, you live on his made Earth, you live by the rules he made for us to live by, you are no exception
You are obliged to learn and do according to what Allah allows. You, me, and everyone are generally the same, same metabolism, same digestive system, same need for nutrition, same need for self cleansing and waste disposal, same need for sleep, etc..
Don't joke about it or try to be a wise-mouth, people did this before and disregarded warning sent to them, now they wish to live again and do what they made fun of like you are doing now, do you need to wait until it's too late to try and make up for your mistakes? No, you don't
Religion of Islam sets needed morals for humanity, self inflicting damage is immoral accordingly, of all kinds
I'm not obligated to do what Allah wants me to do, as I don't believe he exists. Islam, or any other religion for that matter, doesn't set my morals for me. My morals came from my own personal experiences as a living human being.
I'm not obligated to do what Allah wants me to do, as I don't believe he exists. Islam, or any other religion for that matter, doesn't set my morals for me. My morals came from my own personal experiences as a living human being.
Believe or don't, it's not up to your belief to decide how to live in the afterlife
And if not for Islam, no one here would have known what a moral is, or even the internet built on algorithms discovered originally by Muslim a scientist doing what he did cause he lived Muslim and followed the rules
You wouldn't have the basics of medicine basing all the knowledge to medical knowledge available these days
Mercy was not going to exist, because the religion introducing mercy to people is Islam
Human rights originally existed because of Islam
And tattoos violate morals, whether you believe it or not
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
