Jordacar
The Endless One
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2007
- Messages
- 6,126
- Reaction score
- 447
- Points
- 73
You'd think it'd be the other way around, right?
In the last 20 years, we've had "Adventures of Superboy", "Lois & Clark" and "Smallville." There was also "Superman:TAS" and "Justice League" of course, but with Batman there's been "Batman: TAS", "The Batman" and now "Batman:B&B" (and I guess "JL" might as well count while we're at it). What's the caped crusader had for live action TV? Besides "Birds of Prey"?
How could this be? If Superman is more reliant on special effects, science fiction, and just general epicness, then why does he keep getting TV budgets thrown at him instead of Batman? Anybody else find this strange?
In the last 20 years, we've had "Adventures of Superboy", "Lois & Clark" and "Smallville." There was also "Superman:TAS" and "Justice League" of course, but with Batman there's been "Batman: TAS", "The Batman" and now "Batman:B&B" (and I guess "JL" might as well count while we're at it). What's the caped crusader had for live action TV? Besides "Birds of Prey"?
How could this be? If Superman is more reliant on special effects, science fiction, and just general epicness, then why does he keep getting TV budgets thrown at him instead of Batman? Anybody else find this strange?