1) I am neither in love with or infatuated with Sam Jackson.
2) Everyone is entitled to their own opinion.
3) I don't think anyone around here is too scare
d to post about anything.
1) Wouldn't bother me at all.
2) You have the right to feel betrayed by Marvel if you feel that strongly about having a black man play Fury....but there is no reason to feel
disgusted with Jackson for accepting a job and pleasing his fans.
3) Please show me where you read that. I have heard nothing about him having financial problems or not being able to handle money. I would hate to think that you will perjure yourself in your attempt to make your case heard.
4) So? The actual comic book Nick Fury will be around 102 years old in 9 years. The current version of Fury will be around 60 years old in 9 years. Clint Eastwood is currently 79 years old. John Wayne made his last action movie at 69 years of age. Just because an actor is no longer in their 20's doesn't mean they can't play action roles.
5) That is your perogative....BUT....do not belittle others for having a different opinion....AND....do not show your disapproval with racial insults.
1) Complaining is one thing...trolling is another...so watch your step.
2) I'm not.
3) As I said before...you are allowed to voice your opinion...as long as it doesn't become insulting or trollish.
4) You are in for a very long wait.
1) Finally something we can agree on.
2) If that is his opinion...then he can state it.
3) Many here consider me elderly....but I wouldn't slap them for making such a statement. John wouldn't slap them for saying it either...he had a great sense of humor.
1) I am an American...and that statement is condescending, rude, and unnecessary. As a
moderator here, I have to tell you not to continue with such statements.
2) We do...but Latveria is so hard to get into these days. Knock off the jingnostic talk.
3) You are awarded that honor...you don't win it.
4) You never know....many people said that there would never be an African American as President of the United Staes too.[/quot
Marvel is trying to steer clear of high salaries for actors, a notion given weight after they replaced Terrence Howard with Don Cheadle. They also have reportedly only offered Mickey Rourke $250,000 to take a role as a villain, and are expecting Jackson to take a pay cut as well. Were all excited to see an
Iron Man sequel, but could Marvel be killing the momentum of the first film by undercutting their talent? We sure hope not. Theyve done a great job of taking ownership of the
Iron Man and
Hulk franchises in 2008. Itd be a shame to watch them throw it all away. Maybe Marvel execs should start wearing WWTSD bracelets, as in What would Tony Stark do?
Should Samuel L. Jackson take a pay cut? Whos in the wrong here; the actors or Marvel Studios?


