Will this be the last one?

S

Srp5548

Guest
Im new so sorry if this thread is already started but i was reading an old interview from october 2004 after spiderman 2 came out where Raimi said 3 would be the last one but i also read that Amy Pascal wanted 6 movies and raimi said if he still feel's the way he does now he would direct them all so im confused will the 3rd probably be the last or have things changed since the interview in 2004
 
sorry I forgot to post the interview

2004 - "Sam Raimi shocked press this weekend when he said that Columbia Pictures intends for Spider-Man 3 to be the final film in the series. Apparently, Amy Pascal has made it clear that she wants a definitive finale."

2005 - "Spider-Man director Sam Raimi told SCI FI Wire that Sony Pictures plans to make six of the comic-inspired films, and that he'd consider helming them if he feels as strongly about them as he does about the upcoming third installment. "I've heard Amy Pascal [chairman of Sony's motion picture group] say she wants to make six Spider-Man pictures," Raimi said in an interview at the Saturn Awards in Los Angeles. "So I think she's a woman of her word. And if she says there'll be six, there'll be six. ... If they were to ask me, and if I felt as passionate as I feel now about the character and had this great hunger and desire to tell the story, which I really do now, you couldn't keep me away from it."
 
I always thought SM3 would not be the last, but I do remember hearing that Dunst will bow out after this one.
 
MichaelDigital said:
I always thought SM3 would not be the last, but I do remember hearing that Dunst will bow out after this one.
Then kill her off.:mad: I haven't seen a good Kirsten film in a while...I think the Spider-Man films are great for her.
 
Spider-Man 3 will be the last one for Kirsten Dunst. She and Tobey have three-movie contracts. Tobe himself has said nothing about it either way. Raimi signs for the films one at a time.
 
I personally hope its the last, I would rather have a trilogy then risking having some movies that arent good. And if this wasnt the last one, why would they be putting SO much in this one. I think its the last one, so there putting there all into it
 
spiderguy252000 said:
I personally hope its the last, I would rather have a trilogy then risking having some movies that arent good. And if this wasnt the last one, why would they be putting SO much in this one. I think its the last one, so there putting there all into it
I pretty much feel the same way. :up:
 
spiderguy252000 said:
I personally hope its the last, I would rather have a trilogy then risking having some movies that arent good. And if this wasnt the last one, why would they be putting SO much in this one. I think its the last one, so there putting there all into it
Well I believe as long as its Raimi directing them, theyll be good, so if he will, I say bring 'em on
 
I think as long as spider man 3 does well at the box office, i'd say its safe to assume they'll be Spider man 4 eventually. The question is, will Rami direct and will Tobey stay on?
 
I think they both would
 
**** No There Plannin On 6 But Its Depends On This Box Office Which Will Be More Than Sm2
 
There will be another Spider Man after this one...Sony wouldnt waste an opportunity to make more money, even if it loses the cast and the director.
 
Spider-Man $821 million, Spider-Man 2 $783 million

Its a safe bet itll make around $800 million, with the budget including promotion itll have cost around $350 million

The profit will be huge again, of course they'll do at least one more
 
I hope Sam stays on for all 6 and Tobey as well, Kirsten I can live without. I still wish they would have made Mary Jane more like the comics.
 
How do you top S-M3 that has symbiote spider-man,Sandman,GG,Venom,and another unknown villain in one movie.Sinister Six can top it,but they need to save that for S-M6,so what villains can be in S-M4 that will make the movie better than S-M3.

Having less than four villains would not be the way to do it,and what four villains could even be better than the ones we get in S-M3.
 
I personally will always want moe, but i say don't wear out a good thing. So i say one more to finish the franchise
 
I bet 4 will have the Lizard......it's about time for him.
 
GoldGoblin said:
How do you top S-M3 that has symbiote spider-man,Sandman,GG,Venom,and another unknown villain in one movie.Sinister Six can top it,but they need to save that for S-M6,so what villains can be in S-M4 that will make the movie better than S-M3.

Having less than four villains would not be the way to do it,and what four villains could even be better than the ones we get in S-M3.

having venom in for a full movie and lizard as a side in 4 and have five carnage and spidey and venom team up and 6 sinster six return of doc ock
 
TheArtman said:
I bet 4 will have the Lizard......it's about time for him.

^I agree,they will have him in there as one of the villains ,that's for sure.
 
chaseter said:
Then kill her off.:mad: I haven't seen a good Kirsten film in a while...I think the Spider-Man films are great for her.


omg calm down Chaseter!- your foaming at the mouth!!! lol

I dont think they should kill MJ just cause you dont like Kristen.. lol

As to the original question.. Trust me there will be more then 3 Spidermans.. And btw,,, there is going to be serious special effects and stories in those. I think the writers will be on board. I hope Raimi would be too..! Damn this is going to kick butt.

Cause if this is true. Spiderman will by the first movie that would be making 6 consecutive movies without any prolonged lenght of time between them.

This would be beyond my wildest imaginations. Beyond my dreams.

It already has been. Breaking records for a movie. One of the highest grossing movies in history. Changing motion picture record books! This is the premiere movie now in the box office! Super huge budgets! Raimi gets as much money as he wants pretty much for the movies now!!! The hype for these movies does not have a precident!

It's been truly amazing! Eat that Bat-Man/Superman/Xmen!!!!! lol

Spideys the MAN!!!!!!
 
Theres a good amount of great villains left for future installments...I think lol

Id have 4 having only one Venom, since his 10 mins at the end of SM3 will be his introduction
 
ISHMAEL said:
having venom in for a full movie and lizard as a side in 4 and have five carnage and spidey and venom team up and 6 sinster six return of doc ock

^If they would of left Venom out of S-M3 and waited until S-M4,then they could of had Venom and Lizard in S-M4 and that would of topped S-M3 that had Sandman and GG2,but because they already have Venom in S-M3 and him dying at the end of it,we won't see Venom being the main villain ever.

And also if Venom was in S-M4 with Lizard,you can't have Venom in S-M5 with Carnage,people will get bored seeing the same villain in every movie.Moviegoers don't want to see a spidey movie that has the symbiote in every one of them.

You have to give moviegoers different villains that can do different things,that has different stories,and have different looks to them,it keeps everything fresh.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
201,164
Messages
21,908,476
Members
45,703
Latest member
BMD
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"