Astro13Zombie
Superhero
- Joined
- May 28, 2008
- Messages
- 9,287
- Reaction score
- 1,648
- Points
- 103
If batman can have big pointed ears..
Cap can have his wings.
Cap can have his wings.
I agree but Marvel gives to much freedom to these directors. They let them make any change they want. When there should be some do's & don't list with each character. guideline list or something.If batman can have big pointed ears..
Cap can have his wings.
He'll have a different costume in Avengers, right? If he does and its more modern I would like to see wings on that
^ this!like i said we got thor's loki's and odin's helmets and capes, iron man's armor, a cg hulk, what is wrong with 2 little wings. Thors and odins are huge. its a movie you must suspend disbelief or else you didn't want to purposefully.
like i said we got thor's loki's and odin's helmets and capes, iron man's armor, a cg hulk, what is wrong with 2 little wings. thors and odins are huge. its a movie you must suspend disbelief or else you didn't want to purposefully.
Apparenty directer Joe Johnston feels that way & Marvel agrees because their letting him have his way.and people are gonna find the movie hard to believe...over a couple of wings on his mask/helmet? Please.Cosmic Cube, Infinity Gauntlet
This has been my argument for years. Marvel lets any directer come in & in one film changes the whole history or look of a character for all the future movies. Unless of course they bomb. Then Marvel looks for scapegoats. When its them for letting these asinine changes happen to begin with.That's the part that get's me. Why would Marvel not have certain guidelines when developing their characters. I mean come on not even stenciled ones?
This has been my argument for years. Marvel lets any directer come in & in one film changes the whole history or look of a character for all the future movies. Unless of course they bomb. Then Marvel looks for scapegoats. When its them for letting these asinine changes happen to begin with.
First big mistake was The Hulk. They let Ang Lee run wild & change anything he wanted. Did you ever see the Manthing movie what a disgrace.Although I'm very suspicious of this Captain America movie, we must be fair: Marvel has done a GREAT job in the two Iron Man installments, and it seems that Thor is going that way, too.
Concerning superhero movies, so far, Marvel studios are doing a helluva job.
If Captain America bombs, or if the fans will notice serious problems in the way they have adapted it, it will be the first mistake.
First big mistake was The Hulk. They let Ang Lee run wild & change anything he wanted. Did you ever see the Manthing movie what a disgrace.
First big mistake was The Hulk. They let Ang Lee run wild & change anything he wanted. Did you ever see the Manthing movie what a disgrace.
Yes, but in combat only painted on, or some kind of helmet embroidery. I don't want big sticking out ridiculous wings while he's on the battlefield.
Ridiculous in that sense is a matter of opinion.
See, superhero stuff is somewhat a way of bringing back those ancient gods of polytheistic civilizations.
Thus you have Flash being like Mercury, Superman who is a Hercules in strenght, and sometimes you have gods themselves turned into superheroes, like Thor.
Anyway: gods can have animal heads, like the Egyptian Horus; a god can have something attached to his anthropoid anatomy, like the wings in Hermes's feet, etc.
Thus, Captain America symbolizes a superhuman entity, emblematic of some ideals. He naturally can have, without being ridiculous, some little wings attached to his head.
There are those who want him to look, on the other hand, like a mere jarhead. Those do not find him ridiculous with a stupid helmet (insert that Seinfeld joke here) nor for carrying a gun.
A gun.
I find him ABSOLUTELY infamous AND ridiculous with that miserable appendix of ordinary lunatics.
That's an opinion. And I would prefer CA WITH his wings and WITHOUT that monstruous toy.