• Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Tuesday Aug 19, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST (date has been pushed). This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Would anyone here ever run for office?

Is a career in politics in your future?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Unsure


Results are only viewable after voting.
Two reasons

1) SupermanBeyond had to turn it (like every thread) into one of his soap boxes for a rant on fair tax. :cmad:

2) My platforum was so awesome that everyone knew they couldn't compete so they just quit writing theirs and decided to give me the presidency :oldrazz: :cwink:
I didn't Rant on the Fairtax on this one. I put it as my position on Taxation and left it at that. I was being hammered on my position on Voting Rights and a United Democracies Union. I only brought up the Fairtax on my first post on this thread and didn't talk about it anymore.

But, your 2nd reason is for real though.
 
To get this thread back on track, I'm going to respond to Malice's platform :up:

Here is the updated Platform of Malice for Prez:​

Overall Government View
Here is my opinion of how the government should operate in the general (the specifics are below) I think the Federal Government should entirely stay out of most things. So I would say I am a Constitutionalist on the Federal Governments view. I dont believe that the government is here for the most part to provide much more than freedom and protection of its citizens. All issues not assigned the Federal Government should be handled at the State level.

The only probelm I have with a Constitutionalist view point is that even in its conception, the Founders had the forsight to see that the Constitution needed to be changed from time to time and was a living document. That is why they put in an amendment process. And just as times have expanded, so has the role of the federal government. The fact is, its just not practical for a state entity to be expected to carry out the responsibilities a modern society needs. Granted, some issues belong in the hands of the state, but not all of them.

Abortion
The issue of Abortion is a very divisive issue.
If the government was to outlaw it, those seeking abortions would end up "finding" places to do it, or do something so insane such as using a coat-hanger.

I personally think, that it is up to the mother. That be the case, I think they should talk to the mother and then with adoptive parents about it. They should work out a deal that the mother completes the pregnenacy for costs
and then hands it over to the adoptive parents. Basically turning the unwanted pregnancy into a surrogate pregnancy. Aside from that, I think abortion in the first 2 trimesters is allowed, then its illegal.

I like this idea :up:

Budget
The US Congress and Presidency as of late has gone unchecked in its spending. This needs to stop if there is any hope in the future of actually having a fiscal budget that is nothing but covering existing debt.

This will be a hard fought battle but needs to be done.

I believe that there needs to be a good 10%-20% cut in many of the Government funded programs if not cut entirely. This is obviously going to be a case by case basis, and there are so many programs in existance getting government funding, that honestly, they needs to sit down and go over them one by one. I would be willing to bet that 1 billion dollars alone could be eliminated by the govt, and 99.9% of the pulic would never know it because those programs cut would have little or no impact. Of course my goal would be more than 1 Billion, but this would be a hard battle.

Seems like a good plan. I'd even go as far to argue that there is at least 10 billion in government spending per year that is unnecessary. After all, there are times and places for social programs, but if China decides to call in its debt and the government goes bankrupt, who could they really help then? We may need to sacrifice a little bit now in order to perserve our country for future generations. Unfortunately, this generation has no concept of what the word "sacrifice" means.

Defense and Military
Defense of the US serves numerous purposes.
I think first of all, they are to support the defense of the states as is standard. I am all for having a large standing military and a large reserve. You never know when we may be called to perform a large military action.
During World War II, Roosevelt had the forsite to see us coming into the war. He enacted the draft even before we were in war. I dont see that happening again in the near future. The US Military provides men and women both
with a career path also, I think this is a good thing. I figure (granted I trully dont know the numbers of the current troop levels, we should have around 2 million troops, and then 1.5 to 3 million in reserve and then of course with the National Guard. Remember the National Guard is the force that we use to assist with natural disasters, so a well oiled machine there, is only a huge benefit to us as a people.

As far as the military bases around the world. I dont think we honestly need to have troops stationed in something like 60 nations (aside from Marines stationed in Embassy's). I dont think that is needs, close a number of them
and create more virtual and mobile bases on ships.

Good idea. More mobile and virtual bases would allow our military to be so much more flexible. And I concur that we really don't need many of these foreign bases. Do we really have to keep watch in Germany...STILL? Is there really any chance of the Nazis returning to power or the Communists invading?

Education
The education system in the US is in really bad shape. This is a well known fact. I believe we need the Federal Government to get out of the Education business. They need to get rid of all mandated policies and let the States
themselves take this over. I think the Federal Government should simply hand education funds to the states, and that is all they should do. Why?

When you have one mandated policy, you have no room for inovation in instruction. They are told exactly what to teach. If each state had their own way of doing things, you would eventually have some ingenious innovations occur in teching students. For instance, if Oregon started teching a different way and had huge success, and Washington was not having any, Washington would have the opportunity to learn from Oregon and adapt to their own issues. Inflexibility in teaching methods is one problem I see by having the Federal Government involved.

Amen to that. No child left behind is a ridiculous policy and does much more harm than good.

Energy
There are numerous problems we face in the future, and Energy use is one of the largest. We use massive amounts of energy and we need to start finding a way of being self-sufficient with it.

Oil - Right now, we get a majority of our oil from countries we would not even let come to our own homes. We are supporting governments that we would not ordinarrilly support, simply because they produce oil. I find this a security risk and simply put, bad business.

Nuclear - Nuclear is a "fairly" clean process. It does have its negatives, but with current known technologies, its by far one of the cleanest. We need to start utilizing this more and more, until we can find a trully clean and renewable energy source.

I am now coining a new term, the "Clean and Rewnewable Power Education Project" - CarPep This project would be similar to the Manhatten Project of the 40's. The government would give large grants to research institutions in researching ways of getting rid of our unclean ways of power, by building a new one. This means companies and institutions would be given large grants (based off proposals to a scientific group) for money. The group then does their research, constantly sending all data to a new agency setup strictly for this venture (when its acheived, the agency would go away).

Once a viable solution is procured and meets approval, this technology is given FREELY to the US auto and power companies as well as the US military. Of course, the companies its given to, must have export compliance policies in place so that this technology as least for some time, is in the hands of only the US (granted we all know it would be reverse engineered by others in a short amount of time).[/quote]

Great idea :up:

Environment
In the last 50 years we have seen some changes to the Earth, and we need to do something to keep the Earth a viable place to live for our children. We need to find the alternative power source to completely replace oil (listed above in the Energy section). We also need to do a more effective job of recycling waste.

We need to start trying to convince manufacturers to packge in papers, not plastics. There are numerous devices we use on a daily basis that are significantly more poisonous to the environment then ones that might cost a few cents more to make. We need to change the attitude of the people to accept the slight increase in price for the knowledge that we are performing a global service.

I think you'll find it very difficult to simply convince companies. Though the green movement does seem to be having some success right now, I question how long it will last. Tax incentives are the way to go and if they do not work, consider mandatory law. I do not normally like government interference in the private sector...but this issue is too important to let slide. Afterall, if there is no Earth, how can the free market exisit?

Gay Rights
This is another incredibly divisive issue. I myself grew up Catholic but now have significant problems with the church and am basically non-practicing. If a couple, who happen to be of the same sex, wish to state to the Government they are to be a partnetship (via a civil wedding) I am all for it. Of course different religions will have a problem with this, but this is not the governments problem. Lets the Religions fight with the Gay couples, not the government.

Amen to that. And I can relate as a fellow non-practicing Catholic who has become disillusioned by the Church. That being said, it is simply a distraction issue and I don't think it even deserves the federal government's time. Let states handle it.

General Finance
The government needs to be significantly more responsible with the money of the people it works for.

I dont believe in a balanced budget, because unfortunately, the government sometimes must spend more money than it takes in (ie, times of war or possible financial crisis)

But I would imagine, something can be done, to force a balanced budget until specific criteria are met. For instance, if we have "not declared war" then the budget each year must be balanced. (granted my fear is war will be declared
to get legislation passed, so they can get extra money). Also, the budget must be balanced unless Congress sees the US economy needing more money to be spent becuase of hardships.

Those listed above a very theoretical, and I am not even sure if they could work, but I thought it would be worth mentioning.

I think it should be plain and simple. Very clear cut and black and white. If we aren't in war time, don't spend money we don't have.

Gun Control
The 2nd Amendment says I have the right to bear arms. When that was written, it was geared towards a Militia and for personal defense. Although right now, we really dont need the militia (unless we get invaded). Personal protection is still a viable precedent. Thru the years, armaments have grown in destructive power. I honestly dont think anyone should ever own an Anti-Tank weapon (RPG, LAW rocket, etc...) I am ok banning a class of weapons in that range or above it (the devil is in the details of course). I am adamently for you being able to own an rifle, pistol and shotgun you want.

I stated in a previous thread, if it can damage a tank, its too big.[/quote]

I don't think you go far enough. I support the right to own a hunting rifle, but an assault rifle in my eyes is a bit too much for the average citizen to have.

Health Care
This is one of the most talked about a debated issues in the Presidential race today. Rightly so, its an important issue to discuss.

I dont believe the Government getting involved and putting together a Government sponsored Health Care program is the right way to approach this. The government tends to be very inefficient, this needs to be a government RECOGNIZED private market solution.

I have heard of different systems where people post money into a health account, and it gets used from there. I have not found enough information to trully be able to speak about it.

I would be for a government sponsored private account system, but I do believe every child should have universal healthcare, no questions asked. If you are a minor, you shouldn't have to worry about being unable to see a doctor.

Immigration
I think the first things we need to do, before everything else, is enforce the US borders. Enfore immigration laws. Noone gets in without proper documentation. This MUST be enacted and functioning before the next step goes into action.

The next thing I think, some would clasify as a form of Amnesty. Unfortunately, we cant in all good conscience deport 12 million people. I say we do the following:

1) Set a date 6 months (after the borders are classified as secure) where illegal immigrants are required to contact the Immigration Offices, and register. This registration gives them a valid ID. They are required to state where they came from and how long they have been here. They are to pay a 5K fine (this is honestly an arbitray number, but can change) for being here illegally, breaking our laws. They are given a VISA for 5 years. At the end
of those 5 years, they must learn to read and write English. If they dont learn English, the 5 year visa, is pulled, and the immigrant is deported.

2) At the end of the 6 months, the free registration ends. Then, any illegal found gets deported, simple as that. This means, if you get pulled over by a cop, you get your info run. You go to a hospital, you get your info run.
Basically, when an illegal immigrant gets deported when they are discovered. We wont go after them, they will "be found thru normal means."

Also, at the end of these 6 months, companies are required to verify that their employees are Legal. If they are not, the company will significantly fined. This will force the companies to get their illegal immigrant to register
and get into the system.

I'd love to think that would work, but I think it is just encouraging law breaking. Even with enforced border security, people will find a way through. Now if they see people being rewarded by being given citizenship for sneaking through the borders, they are going to think "Hey, if enough of us get over, they will have to just do it again." and the process will repeat itself.

Minimum Wage
Minimum Wage is technically against Complete Free Capitalism. Honestly though, we are not a Complete Free Capitalist society because the government interferes in business affairs. The raising of the wage must be done to ensure employees are fairly compensated. Technically the employer would do this as a reward for good effort to the employee. We are mainly doing this to prevent exploitation.

I'd like to think workers will be rewarded for hard work...at the same time, I doubt it will happen out of the kindess of a business owner's heart. I think this is one of those few occassions where the government must step on the toes of the private sector.

NASA and Space
I honestly believe that man needs to explore and colonize space in the hundreds of years to come. If we do nothing, we endanger ourselves. To help get to that point, we need to heavilly fund the space program here in the states, to a similar degree as was done in the 60's. I think we need to fund and devise a way to put a settlement on the Moon.

Once that is done, we will learn new technologies and way of doing things. This will lead us to heading to Mars next. The space program has perform thousands of experiments that we cannot perform here on Earth. This is a huge scientific platform that in the end benefits us all, granted it may take many years.

Also, this gives the nation a point on which to rally together. In the 60's almost every person alive can tell you about the moon landings. I want to continue that tradition.

Wrong time. Our country is too deep in debt to be pursuing this. NASA should be one of the first budget cuts of many to get us out of our overwhelming debt. Maybe we can return to it in the future, but for now...its just too expensive.

Politics and Political Parties
Politics has become a way of life for people. Honestly, I believe there should be a 2 term limit for Senators and a 4 term limit for Congressman. This would most likely never come to pass, since the Congress would have to ratify it.

I believe there should not be career politicians in Congress, not for 40 years.

I completely abhore the political parties as they exist. The parties work to their own ends, to keep themselves in power, not for the good of the people. Unfortunately nothing cna be done about the parties.

I love the idea of term limits on Congress.

Social Security
I would retroactively change the age of Social Security to 70.

This means, all people under the age of 50 would have to wait till 70, to get Social Security benefits, and those over 50 will get their benefits as they are now.

12 years down the line, this will actually create a decrease in Social Security members, as no new members are entered into the system (except some that might get disability). This will give the Social Security administration some time to make other reforms I have not enacted.

I agree with this idea, but it won't mean a thing if our federal government doesn't stop dipping its hands into our social security funds. We need to pass laws to prevent "borrowing" social security money.

(see next post for more)
 
Continued:

Terrorism and Homeland Security
This has most likely been the largest and most divicive issue in the last 10 years.

I find the Patriot Act to be unconstitutional. It would be repealed. Wiretapping without a warrent is illegal. Reading emails without a warrant is illegal.

I believe the CIA needs more funding for human intelligence gathering all around the world. They will be the ones that help us in the time of need by gaining information. There is no substitute for having someone in the enemys
camp.

The US invasion of Iraq. I personally dont think we should have gone there, but since we are there, we need to see it thru. If we were to leave on a "scheduled timeframe" the opposition would just lay in wait for that day, then
come out in force, so a scheduled withdrawl is simply unacceptable. We are going to have to be there for some time to help the Iraqi government do for themselves.

I agree about the Patriot Act and unwarranted survelliance, but I don't think the Iraqi Government will ever work. All you will see is civil war as two of three groups will ALWAYS be oppressed. And this is different then a political party being oppressed as in our country. This is an entire culture, religion, and way of life being ruled over by people who despise them. I think we need to split up Iraq into three different countries who are unified only for the sake of oil revenue sharing.

Transportation
The US is a country of roads and airports. We MUST keep the aging infrastructure in place and functioning. If it was to really start to breakdown, the US businesses would be negatively impacted, thus hurting the people even more.

I think the US needs to try to invest more in Mass Transit. MagLev trains is one idea, and of course, teleporters (just kidding).

I wouldn't mind seeing Maglev trains come state side, though I think it should be run privately as it is too expensive of a project for tax payers to shoulder.

Welfare
Originally welfare was simply put, a package to help those in need during a dire time. Currently the US is not in a dire time. The system now, is creating a problem. It propogates itself. Someone gets on welfare, and they are not
given incentive to get off it.

I propose a new system that only allows a recipient to only be on it for a total of 20 years in their lifetime. With that in mind, they can only be on it, for 5 years at a time. Then they must be off it for 5 years. So basically,
someone could be one and off it in 5 year stints for 40 years. By that time the person is most likely in their late 50's.

The way the welfare system hands out money is also unacceptable. They should simply give out vouchers for essentials. No cash is given out at all.

The Welfare system is needed to help those truly in need. All that really needs done is reform to ensure closer supervision. You want our hand outs? Fine. We are going to be watching you under a microscope in exchange.

Also Malice, what are your thoughts on free trade? I personally say we do away with it entirely. It only hurts the working man and allows exploitation of foreign citizens. You want to import, pay tariffs. On a side note, I think we need to eliminate the 54 cent per gallon tariff on imported ethanols simply to ease the burden at the gas pump for the average American.
 
I didn't Rant on the Fairtax on this one. I put it as my position on Taxation and left it at that. I was being hammered on my position on Voting Rights and a United Democracies Union. I only brought up the Fairtax on my first post on this thread and didn't talk about it anymore.

Don't worry, I'm just busting chops :cwink:

But, your 2nd reason is for real though.

Damn skippy it is :up:
 
Two reasons

1) SupermanBeyond had to turn it (like every thread) into one of his soap boxes for a rant on fair tax. :cmad:

2) My platforum was so awesome that everyone knew they couldn't compete so they just quit writing theirs and decided to give me the presidency :oldrazz: :cwink:

My platform > Your platform :oldrazz:
 
Have you posted one? :huh:

|
|
\/​

A lot of I believe in agrees completely with jman (I really like your ideas on health care and Social Security). So I copy and pasted a lot of what he posted

Health Care
I ensure that the overall health care system within the United States would be privatized. Socialized health care is not the way to go because we are a nation that is too big to do so (over 300 million people) and such a system would hinder innovations in the health care industry and we would most likely experience a shortage on the necessary staff required.

However, the current system is not working. Health care costs far too much in this nation. Government intervention is necessary in order to make sure that it is affordable and accessible.

As jman said: "I support extending Medicaid programs to those who cannot afford basic health care coverage. Additionally, I would have the Department of Health and Human Services set up regional health care markets which could be used to direct consumers to individual health care companies, including Medicaid 2.0. These health care markets would work a lot like Progressive Auto Insurance: They would get you a quote from all the leading health insurers, and would compare those quotes to Medicaid 2.0. The goal would be to open Medicaid 2.0 to every individual (those who are not entitled to the "free" benefits would have to pay to be covered), offering a low-cost alternative to private insurers, with the hope of reducing private insurance companies' prices over time."

Social Security
I support gradual privatization of Social Security. The money is going to be gone before I can get my hands on it. I believe the government should give people the option to opt out of Social Security if they so desire. Furthermore, the government should encourage the wealthiest 10% of Americans to take control of their retirement, and leave Social Security for those who make under a certain income. A series of benchmarks should be put in place to ensure the program runs successfully, with the final goal of having 50% of those eligible for Social Security benefits investing in their own retirement by 2050. Assuming I'm running in 2008, the benchmarks would be as follows:

2020: 10% Privatized-- The Wealthiest Americans, in addition to some middle-class households, have taken control of their own retirement

2030: 25% Privatized-- Most of those making above $120,000 a year have taken control of their own retirement

2050: 50% Privatized-- Everyone making above $120,000 have taken control of their own retirement; most of those making between $50,000 and $120,000 have invested in private retirement options.

Illegal Immigration
I would propose an amendment to the Constitution to make English the official language of the United States, excluding Puerto Rico.

I believe that the United States should set up a guest worker program which would allow so-called "undocumented workers" to work towards full United States citizenship. Learning English and American laws would be a requirement for citizenship.

I also support increasing border security presence along the Mexican-American border. I would put the National Guard along the US-Mexican border along a fence.

However, border security is not the only thing that is necessary to combat illegal immigration. We need to target the employers who willingly hire illegal immigrants.

Energy
The United States needs to invest in environmentally friendly alternatives to energy. We need to invest in wind, solar, and hydro power sources along with developing new technologies. As Malice said, "a Manhattan Project" for energy and develop an X-Prize for companies, individuals, and organizations researching various forms of energy.

Nuclear energy is not the way to go because of the waste it produces, the potential disasters it can cause in the event of a terrorist attack or a nuclear meltdown.

And our dependence on foreign oil from the Middle East is definitely not the way to go.

Renewable energy is the way to go.

Education
The right to regulate the education systems lies to the states in accordance to the Tenth Amendment of the Constitution. However, the states have failed miserably. Therefore it is up to the federal government to take up the job. We need to make our education system on par with that of Japan and Europe. We need to get our students motivated like in China, which I have seen first hand.

Teachers will have a minimum wage of no less than $40,000.00.

We need to rely less on test grades and more on the skills in science, math, history, writing, etc.

Students need to learn a second language, particularly Spanish. Starting at an early age.

Prepare students for the workforce.

Foreign Policy
The Department of State would be renamed the Department of Foreign Affairs.

The Administration of Franklin D. Roosevelt created a foreign policy called the "Good Neighbor Policy" towards Latin America and Europe.

We need to create a new Good Neighbor Policy, but not with just our neighbors and Europe, but the entire world.

Military action should never be taken off the table and a hawkish policy is at time necessary. As jman stated with Iran: "It is our responsibility to begin diplomatic talks with Iran, while simultaneously watching their nuclear program with a hawkish eye. Military force against Iran should always be an option, and the United States should remind that whackjob over there that we can and will engage them militarily if they do anything provocative." But such a power shouldn't be abused. The United States does not have the right to police the world. We shouldn't be in areas where the populace doesn't want us such as the Middle East and Korea.

I would promote the expansion of NATO to include our allies Australia, New Zealand, the Philippines, South Korea, Israel, Japan, and Mexico.

I would promote to expand the permanent members of the United Nations Security Council to include Germany and Japan.

I would promote a two-state solution to the Israeli/Palestinian conflict with Jerusalem as an international city.

The United States is supposed to be the defender of human rights and democracy. While I would maintain diplomatic relations with these nations, my administration will refuse to be buddy/buddy with dictatorships in Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Iran, China, and African regimes.

I would take the free trade/protectionism debate on an case by case basis. I fully support the ideas of NAFTA and a North American trade zone. I would promote more trade with the nations of Europe. However, I would take a more protectionist policy with China who is abusing our trade relationship with their economic, monetary, and enviromental policies.

Gun Control
The Second Amendment forbids the government to deny us the right to bear arms. If we say that the Second Amendment is out of date and get rid of it, what's stopping us from doing the same thing to the First Amendment? Our right to vote?

However certain laws are indeed required like what we have with denying the right to convicted felons, or banning certain types of weapons (like a Stinger missile launcher), or requiring gun safety courses and safeties on weapons.

And I would make ensure that gun manufacturers are not sued. It is not the guns or the gun makers that hurt and kill people with guns, it is the people who use them that do so.

Gay Marriage
There are two aspects of marriage these days. Religious and civil.

For the religious aspect, it is up to the various denominations and religions to decide if they want to bless gay couples.

For the civil aspect, we must recognise the rights of gay couples and make them on par with straight couples. The Defense of Marriage Act is unconstitutional on the grounds that it violates the Equal Protection and Due Process clauses of Amendment XIV, Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution and allows states to violate the "full faith and credit" clause of Article IV, Section 1 of the Constitution.

The Military
I would expand the military to include over 2 million active military personnel and a 2 million reserve force. And increase funding in the development of military technologies.

However, we should pull out of countries such as South Korea, Japan, and Europe. It is their responsibility to defend themselves, not ours. If our allies are under attack, then we will provide the necessary aid, but we don't need military bases on foreign territories. The troops stationed there would be put to better use defending the homeland, particularly the border.

The Budget and Finances
We need to return to fiscal responsibility. The days of the Bush Administration and an irresponsible Congress has brought us nothing but financial ruin.

I would never approve any federal budget that would create a federal deficit.

So just how do we cut federal spending? I would reunite the Departments of Labor and Commerce into one department. I would disband the Departments of Homeland Security and Housing and Urban Development, they are unneeded government bureaucracies the various functions of those departments would go into the appropriate departments. The Department of Veteran's Affairs would be put into the Department of Defense. Other parts of the government such as the Department of Commerce and Labor and the Department of the Interior would get budget cuts.

We wouldn't go into unnecessary wars such as in Iraq and policing the world. No needless pork barrel projects. As jman said: "
Eliminate most welfare programs and replace them with a broad, extensive Public Works Program. Make people work for their money. Those with disabilities, or those who are unable to work, will be able to receive unemployment benefits and social services for an extended period of time."

At the time I would not cut taxes to ensure that we are getting enough revenue to pay for the various government programs.

While not a part of the budget, we need to strengthen the power of the dollar.

I would introduce the Balanced Budget Amendment to the United States Constitution that would require the federal government to pass a budget that is balanced.

Transportation
I rode on a mag-lev train in Shanghai so I really liked what jman said: "Why don't we have Mag-Lev trains on the East and West Coast? I believe we should invest in Mag-Lev technology. AMTRAK just doesn't do it anymore. The slow, inadequate service often makes driving seem like a faster alternative. Not to mention that it's as expensive as all hell. Mag-Lev technology would be able to transport commuters from Boston to Washington, DC in just over four hours. Imagine traveling from Los Angeles to San Diego in an hour; San Francisco to San Diego in three and a half hours; Seattle to San Diego in eight hours or less... it would bring in the customers almost immediately, and would pay for itself in less than a decade."

The Environment
The EPA would become a Cabinet level department known as the Department of Environmental Protection.

Fuel emission standards for cars in this nation would become on par with European standards.

I would not submit the Kyoto Protocol for ratification in the Senate. I would impliment the ideals of the Kyoto Protocol for legislation to help protect the enviroment, but the treaty itself is a load of bull. It is specifically designed for just the United States to take really serious action, nations like Russia is allowed to profit off of it, and nations that are worse polluters like China are exempt from taking any serious action.

Abortion
Abortion is not a fundamental right like many pro-choicers believe. It is completely unethical and morally wrong.

However, Roe v. Wade cannot be overturned. Just imagine the public health crisis it would create. A woman who wants an abortion will get an abortion, legally or illegally. With a coat hanger or with an underground doctor with a an unsterile clinic. It's just too dangerous to ban it.

However we should ban and restrict certain types of abortion such as partial-birth abortions, third trimester abortions, etc. Also, I would not support federal funding for abortion clinics. You want an abortion, you're going to pay for it.

Minimum Wage
First off I should state that I do believe in the minimum wage. I believe that it is necessary.

I find it kind of pointless to raise the minimum wage at the federal level. I see this as a right of the states to decide on how much the minimum wage shall be and frankly, the states are far more responsive towards the necessary increases in the minimum wage. When the federal minimum wage was $5.15/hr, the majority of states passed legislation or referendums to increase the minimum wage above $7.00/hr. And more states were most likely bound to do so too.

So leave the minimum wage to the states. They do it far more effectively. The right to do so belongs to in accordance to the Tenth Amendment of the United States Constitution: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." And when the federal government finally decides to act upon it, it's kinda pointless.

NASA and Space
I am a huge believer in the mission that NASA has provided us. I see space exploration on par with the voyages of Christopher Columbus, Ferdinand Magellan, Vasco da Gama, James Cook and many others. That's why I propose that NASA gets fully funded for the missions it needs to explore the unknown and continue the tradition that has been started hundreds of years ago.

Terrorism
Yes there is such a thing as terrorism. That is why I have previously proposed to have a 2 million active and 2 million reserve force for our military, not to just protect the homeland from a Russian or Chinese or French or British attack or to defend the border from illegal immigrants, but to also help prevent terrorist attacks on the homeland.

I would repeal the USA PATRIOT Act. It violates the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution which prohibits unreasonable and warrant less searches and violates the Tenth Amendment of the Constitution which protects our right to privacy (rights not specifically stated belong to either the state or to the people). There is no reason to be investigating on innocent people.

We also need to take a look as to why there are groups such as al-Qaeda and why they want to not only attack the American homeland, but also American interests. We need to take an active participation in preventing these terrorist groups from springing up (i.e. not giving them a somewhat legitimate reason) along with preventing terrorist attacks.

The Electoral College
I will propose an amendment to abolish the Electoral College. It is undemocratic and a President should be elected solely based on the popular vote and the will of the people.

Civil Rights
I oppose the idea of Affirmative Action. It was necessary when it was created, but today is nothing but a relic of the Civil Rights Movement. And relics need to be gotten rid of. Affirmative Action violates Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution which prohibits discrimination by our government.

I would reintroduce the Equal Rights Amendment and the District of Columbia Voting Rights Amendment. And an amendment protecting the equal rights of those based on sexual orientation. That way there can be absolutely no basis on denying the rights ALL American citizens.

I oppose the idea of hate crimes based on the words of Dr. Ron Paul:
Ron Paul on hate crimes

The Customary System
The Customary System of Measurement is completely idiotic on the basis of its measurements and the fact that the rest of the world uses the Metric System.

It's time to get rid of it and convert the United States to the Metric System with the rest of the world.
 
|
|
\/​

Holy shnikes, yours is good. You've got my vote. :up:

I like your thoughts on free trade, though I believe it to be important, that there is free trade, it is only with countries who play by the same rules as us. Countries that protect worker exploitation. In other words, countries that have similiar labor laws and do not give companies incentive to come so they can exploit their workers, I am fine with. By having free trade with countries that play by the same rules as us, it is also more likely that there will be less job exporting as companies will have less incentive to pack up and leave.
 
I've thought about this long and hard. I see a lot on here that I like, and quite a bit that scares me. Below is my Platform, let me know what you think:

Secure the Borders:

*Build the Fence
*Ensure that an interlocking surveillance camera system is installed along the border by July 1, 2010.
*Ensure that the border fence construction is completed by July 1, 2010.
*Increase the number of border patrol agents.
*Fully support all law enforcement personnel tasked with enforcing immigration law.
*Policies that promote or tolerate amnesty will be rejected.
*Employment is the chief draw for most illegal immigrants and denying them jobs is the centerpiece of an attrition strategy.
*Impose steep fines and penalties on employers that violate the law.
*Eliminate the visa lottery system and the admission category for adult brothers and sisters of U.S. citizens.
*Increase visas for highly-skilled and highly-educated applicants.
*Expedite processing for those who serve honorably in the U.S. Armed Forces.
*Improve our immigration process so that those patiently and responsibly seeking to come here legally will not have to wait decades to share in the American dream. Governor Huckabee has always been grateful to live in a country that people are trying to break into, rather than break out of.

Healthcare

*We don't need universal health care mandated by federal edict.
*We do need to get serious about preventive health care.
*I advocate policies that will encourage the private sector to seek innovative ways to bring down costs.
*As President, I will work with the private sector, Congress, health care providers, and other concerned parties to lead a complete overhaul of our health care system.
*Our health care system is making our businesses non-competitive in the global economy. It is time to recognize that jobs don't need health care, people do, and move from employer-based to consumer-based health care.


Taxes

*I support the FairTax.
*Our massive deficit is not due to Americans' being under-taxed, but to the government's over-spending.
*To control spending, I believe the President should have the line-item veto.
*I believe in free trade, but it has to be fair trade.
*Globalization, done right, done fairly, can be the equivalent of a big pay raise by allowing us to buy things more cheaply.




This all I can think of now, I will post more when I finish up. Thanks for reading.
 
I've thought about this long and hard. I see a lot on here that I like, and quite a bit that scares me. Below is my Platform, let me know what you think:

*I support the FairTax.
.

:up:
 
To respond to the opening post NO, I'm simply a MUCH too private person and would hate my life being so scrutinized.

This would be my platform though
:p
platform-4-626.jpg
 
To respond to the opening post NO, I'm simply a MUCH too private person and would hate my life being so scrutinized.

This would be my platform though
:p
platform-4-626.jpg
AWESOME!
 
I'd love to be pres, but i'm sure i'd suck :woot: :(
 
Continued:
Also Malice, what are your thoughts on free trade? I personally say we do away with it entirely. It only hurts the working man and allows exploitation of foreign citizens. You want to import, pay tariffs. On a side note, I think we need to eliminate the 54 cent per gallon tariff on imported ethanols simply to ease the burden at the gas pump for the average American.

Forgot to comment on this

Free Trade
We are not to that point yet. Meaning I dont think the US can really handle it.
I like the idea of the US mirroring the trade policies of foreign countries.

If we trade with lets say, Bolivia, Bolivia doesnt is really restrictive on imports, but not on exports, we should mirror (with that country) their own laws...

That is a thought

In the end, we really need to try to promote growth of the US businesses, and have them as a good alternative to moving the product development out of country.
 
Forgot to comment on this

Free Trade
We are not to that point yet. Meaning I dont think the US can really handle it.
I like the idea of the US mirroring the trade policies of foreign countries.

If we trade with lets say, Bolivia, Bolivia doesnt is really restrictive on imports, but not on exports, we should mirror (with that country) their own laws...

That is a thought

In the end, we really need to try to promote growth of the US businesses, and have them as a good alternative to moving the product development out of country.

While I agree with the idea of promoting the growth of business, I'm not really sure how the US can compete with countries where children can work for 40 cents an hour.

As for your idea on mirroring trade laws, I would support this, but only as long as it is with countries who play by the same rules as us. Canada, for example. If they do not wish to restrict our imports, then we will not restrict theirs. Why? Because there is really not much incentive for a US company to pack up and move to Canada as they have similiar labor and business ethics laws. China, Peru, and Mexico on the other hand does not...therefore, we should not permit free trade with them.
 
While I agree with the idea of promoting the growth of business, I'm not really sure how the US can compete with countries where children can work for 40 cents an hour.

As for your idea on mirroring trade laws, I would support this, but only as long as it is with countries who play by the same rules as us. Canada, for example. If they do not wish to restrict our imports, then we will not restrict theirs. Why? Because there is really not much incentive for a US company to pack up and move to Canada as they have similiar labor and business ethics laws. China, Peru, and Mexico on the other hand does not...therefore, we should not permit free trade with them.

True...I have alot to learn on the Free Trade issues..
 
Given your interest in politics, would that translate into running for something down the line?

Me, its something that I've thought about doing one day. But I'm still trying to look for a career that would put me in a situation to do that.
 
I don't see anything beneficial for me if I did run, nor have I had the slightest interest in running for any public office
 
I am thinking of running for Congressman down the line. I need to build up a better resume, and I think I have a Skeleton in the Closet that could do me a world of hurt, but once that is taken care of, sure I'll run for Congressman later in life.

This is well after I have a Very successful business.
 
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"