Sequels Would you change Spidey's costume???

[ANTOINE X]

Now that your saying this, I totally forgot about the others...you made your point

 

[Eggyman]

They really don't need to be changing the costume - it's fantastic. THE best superhero costume ever, taken to the big screen very very faithfully. No need to change it at all.

 

[UA-Archangel]

This was a redesign I had done a few weeks ago. But seeing that the Ben Reilly costume was still popular, I was thinking about painting that look in a realistic form. If I do whip together a quick pic of the BR costume, does anyone want to see any changes made to it?

I can see that Spidey's been eating well.

 

[Eggyman]

lol

'You know . . . kinda chunky.'

 

[UA-Archangel]

lol

'You know . . . kinda chunky.'

I don't know how well Mary Jane can cook, but Peter might have been eating out...a lot.

It is a good drawing though. I just have a problem with the colour white being on any costume that has been designed for stealth.

 

[Eggyman]

I don't know how well Mary Jane can cook, but Peter might have been eating out...a lot.

It is a good drawing though. I just have a problem with the colour white being on any costume that has been designed for stealth.

Not so sure that the costume was designed for stealth. Certainly not very well thought out, if so - bright red and blue. S'pose he could be stealthy in Superman's wardrobe

 

[UA-Archangel]

Actually, the colour red can absorb a fair amount of light, in dim light conditions. It becomes almost black. That's why WWII pilots doing night missions would be holed up under red lights, because there would be minimal time to adjust to darkness.

So a red (almost any red) and a dark blue costume could work at night.

 

[Eggyman]

Actually, the colour red can absorb a fair amount of light, in dim light conditions. It becomes almost black. That's why WWII pilots doing night missions would be holed up under red lights, because there would be minimal time to adjust to darkness.

So a red (almost any red) and a dark blue costume could work at night.

Well I'm not going to disagree with that, BUT, I am going to disagree with 'the costume that has been designed for stealth'. It was designed to look cool

 

[Jack Ups]

The only prob i have with the suit is that how the hell did Peter make it and afford all the stuff that goes into it. I know its a films and the spider films world is one of the less beilvable ones but still lol
His wrestling costume was somthing that h would be able to make, and then he suddenly gets a costume that costs tons of money to make.


and another thing that is stupid that i shoudlent be annoyed about is that spidey's lenses in the film suck for seeing out of. lol in s3 they are way too high and are just too narrow to be pratical for wat spidey does t:

 

[Eggyman]

I see what you're saying, but if they were to make the suit realistically people would be up in arms about having to watch Spidey swing around in a baggy, half-assed costume that makes him look like Super Gran.

 

[Chris Wallace]

I can see that Spidey's been eating well.

Oh, God, that thing is hideous.

 

[Chris Wallace]

Well I'm not going to disagree with that, BUT, I am going to disagree with 'the costume that has been designed for stealth'. It was designed to look cool

It was designed to GRAB ATTENTION. Keep in mind that he created it for showbiz purposes.

 

[Eggyman]

It was designed to GRAB ATTENTION. Keep in mind that he created it for showbiz purposes.

Yeh.

And look cool


Opposite of being designed for stealth: designed to GRAB ATTENTION.

 

[UA-Archangel]

The only prob i have with the suit is that how the hell did Peter make it and afford all the stuff that goes into it. I know its a films and the spider films world is one of the less beilvable ones but still lol
His wrestling costume was somthing that h would be able to make, and then he suddenly gets a costume that costs tons of money to make.

Well, you know how one man's trash is another's treasure?

That's right, Peter dug through his neighbour's trash looking for things that he could use to make his web shooters.

 

[Chris Wallace]

We're talking movies; there ain't no web shooters.

 

[Eggyman]

We're talking movies; there ain't no web shooters.

Do you think if Spidey ever got handed a reboot (like the recent Superman news), that Sony would contemplate introducing the shooters?

Personally I think that organics are here to stay.

 

[Chris Wallace]

I prefer them, honestly. I find it kind of goofy that a guy who naturally "does whatever a spider can" would need to artificially supplement his powers in order to do what is arguably the defining characteristic of a spider (as opposed to, say, an ant.)
Plus, I think that doing so would throw off the audience. They've known & liked the natural webbing for three movies, & the small percentage of fans who were grossed out by it have mostly gotten over it.
I think a reboot is unlikely. I don't see the need for a reboot. They've had 3, count, THREE successful movies. Well-received, (moreso than not) commercially successful & generally good. All this rumbling about a reboot/revamp/re-whatever-the-hell-you-wanna-call-it is because a relatively small group of people are complaining about things in the third movie that are of no real consequence to the franchise as a whole. Batman got revamped b/c the series was taken in a goofy direction & met with RESOUNDINGLY NEGATIVE response. After what was done by Schumacher, there was simply no choice. Either start from scratch & take it in a whole new direction or kill it altogether. Same with Superman. After 28 years, we got an uninspired retread of everything Donner did wrong & nothing that he did right. We expected better from Singer, we expected better from Spacey, & in the wake of the Spider-Man, X-Men & revamped Batman successes, we expected better from Superman. Hulk was more widely disliked than liked (either that or the naysayers were more vocal) & so they modified the approach. "Incredible Hulk" was more of a re-tweaking than a reboot. Nonetheless, I don't feel Spider-Man is in need of either.

 

[Chris Wallace]

Yeh.

And look cool


Opposite of being designed for stealth: designed to GRAB ATTENTION.

Exactamundo!

 

[nameless_hero]

I'd like to see a Ben reilly suit at somepoint, but no clones

 

[nameless_hero]

Not my favorite concept but I thought it was unique so I thought I'd put my spin on it.

 

[Chris Wallace]

I would loathe seeing that on film.

 

[Eggyman]

I prefer them, honestly. I find it kind of goofy that a guy who naturally "does whatever a spider can" would need to artificially supplement his powers in order to do what is arguably the defining characteristic of a spider (as opposed to, say, an ant.)
Plus, I think that doing so would throw off the audience. They've known & liked the natural webbing for three movies, & the small percentage of fans who were grossed out by it have mostly gotten over it.
I think a reboot is unlikely. I don't see the need for a reboot. They've had 3, count, THREE successful movies. Well-received, (moreso than not) commercially successful & generally good. All this rumbling about a reboot/revamp/re-whatever-the-hell-you-wanna-call-it is because a relatively small group of people are complaining about things in the third movie that are of no real consequence to the franchise as a whole. Batman got revamped b/c the series was taken in a goofy direction & met with RESOUNDINGLY NEGATIVE response. After what was done by Schumacher, there was simply no choice. Either start from scratch & take it in a whole new direction or kill it altogether. Same with Superman. After 28 years, we got an uninspired retread of everything Donner did wrong & nothing that he did right. We expected better from Singer, we expected better from Spacey, & in the wake of the Spider-Man, X-Men & revamped Batman successes, we expected better from Superman. Hulk was more widely disliked than liked (either that or the naysayers were more vocal) & so they modified the approach. "Incredible Hulk" was more of a re-tweaking than a reboot. Nonetheless, I don't feel Spider-Man is in need of either.

Me too - just thinking out loud

And agreed on the shooters. Even Stan The Man seems to like the idea (actually seemed a bit peeved that he didn't think about it from what I remember of the interview where he mentioned the organics).

 

[nameless_hero]

I would loathe seeing that on film.

I wasn't suggesting that be in a movie, I just wanted defend the original artist a bit, he seemed to be taking a good deal of heat for being creative.

I still think it's a very stylized suit that could be used in a comic, spinoff or "secret wars" type story line.

I'd like a more comic feel to the suit or Ben's, I think Ben's suit would look sweet in red and black.

 

[Chris Wallace]

I feel like that's Spider-Girl's costume now. And again, he doesn't use webshooters.
The red & silver costume design is, IMO, too ugly to ever be used for anything.
There's no reason to make any drastic changes to Spidey's movie costume. Now subtle modifications are fine. Like the ones thay made between 1 & 2.

But for the most part it's perfect the way it is. They don't need to radically overhaul the best costume ever made, & they'd probably wreck it if they did.

 

[MattBearPig]

I rather like the chest spider on here.