The Batkilt
Civilian
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2008
- Messages
- 373
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 11
Hold on, I am going to demand Raimi to put Venom in SM3...hold on...be right back.
Not really the same thing. A lot of fans had been clamouring for Venom from the get-go with the film series, as he was one of the more prominent villains of the modern era. Raimi's films tend to be based more on the stories of years gone past. There was always going to be a conflict there, especially with that many people wanting Venom.
What's being posted that's the same? The only real consensus I can see is that fans want Catwoman to be given the Nolan treatment. And nowhere near the scale of fans almost demanding Venom in the Spiderman franchise.
Add to that it's two different studios, with different audiences, and a different cast. Spiderman's films didn't have the same critical success to go along with the commercial success of Nolan's Batman films, making studio intervention more likely.
Add to that the millions invested in developing the project before Raimi even became involved, and it's no wonder the studio was going to want to appease the fans. WB, on the other hand, had a successful Batman franchise. It was run into the ground, and I doubt they're going to make the same mistakes. It's why they took their time before announcing a decision on the direction of the next Superman film. They've already spent too much money on mistakes in the past.
.
I know the film was jammed packed but still; that's the whole essence of the character.
