You're needlessly arguing semantics. Given proper context one would read the title properly. Since Batman physically rising informs absolutely nothing of the story and is as random as "Batman Walks", then one would deduce it as Batman overcoming an obstacle. The common phrase "rising to the occasion" can be read literally without having to figure out some metaphorical meaning behind it.No, the literal meaning of "rises" is to get up. Metaphorically, it means to triumph.
An additional meaning. It not only references Batman himself, but the criminal disease that has plagued Gotham for years. It continues the very speech Harvey gave the city during its darkest hours. This is the moment that both Gotham and Bruce have been waiting for, which started years ago with the death of the Wayne's. It is because of this that the current title is far superior. Thematically it resonates more because of its connection with the previous movies.Changing Batman to The Dark Knight doesn't change that, unless you're thinking of some other metaphorical meaning.
I'm really not understanding the complete dismissal of the title.
It sufficiently hits the marketing (continues TDK moniker), thematic ("the night is darkest just before the dawn") and metaphoric (Batman overcoming) targets that any good title would do. Far more effective than the trite fan-favorite of "Batman Rises".
Batman's not going to die, as you seem to be implying. That kind of a move for pure shock factor is more for a hack like M. Night Shyamalan.
And what has been shown about the new Spiderman to say it's crap or going to be crap?

I heard that James Newton Howard will not be involved in the Soundtrack. Hans is a talented composer, no doubt about that, but what made TDK have such an excellent sound was their collaboration together. I hope his omission from the soundtrack won't have a negative impact on the score.