DACrowe
Avenger
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2000
- Messages
- 30,765
- Reaction score
- 624
- Points
- 78
Its pretty simple. If Nolan wanted the twist intact, he probably should have made sure his set was tighter.
Yes, because Nolan can just block every window on Wall Street to shoot a scene outside.
And frankly, even before we "knew", pretty much everyone knew "Miranda" was quite possibly Talia.
I honestly think, even if you didn't know, the Talia twist shouldn't really catch you off guard if you're a halfway intelligent person and thinking about the film as you watch it.
The second the film has a character say "Ra's Al Ghul's daughter" during the flashback, any savvy audience member could realize "Hmm, we've only been introduced to two female characters, and one of them is Catwoman, so either Ra's Al Ghul's daughter is Catwoman, or its Miranda and she's going to betray Bruce".
People get caught off guard because they aren't paying attention and thinking about the film half the time. And getting caught off guard that there's a twist when there's really nothing to suggest there will be a twist throughout most of the film isn't all that big a deal. Anyone can throw a twist into a film. It's not like Bruce was searching for a traitor, or some betrayer inside Wayne Enterprises, or that there was a reference to a shadowy Al Ghul working inside Gotham, etc. There was no reason to believe there WOULD be this twist...unless you understand screenwriting conventions, of course people were caught off guard.
I'll just throw out that they never said "Ra's Al Ghul's daughter," but merely his child. Granted, most hardcore fans would probably put 2 and 2 together, but who knows. All I know is there were audible gaps all three times I saw it and none of my non-fan friends saw it coming. So it worked to some degree.