Sci-Fi Zack Snyder’s Rebel Moon | Netflix

But the fact they're ignored also shows you how little impact they have had on the cultural zeitgeist. Nobody cares about any of this stuff. Rebel Moon is going to be another movie on 10 years absolutely no one talks about
10 years? That's the most generous thing I've heard someone say. It's going to be completely forgotten in a year or even months after the director's cut hit. Barely anyone talks about it now.
 
10 years? That's the most generous thing I've heard someone say. It's going to be completely forgotten in a year or even months after the director's cut hit. Barely anyone talks about it now.
Until the next attempt at creating their own Star Wars...
 
Rebel Moon - Part One Director's Cut Seemingly Gets a New Title Along With Its R-Rating - IGN
The director's cut of Part I is being retitled "Chalice of Blood".
39702145-cdf0-444f-916d-ddbb252f36a9_text.gif


Such pathetic over the top juvenile edgelord garbage is so embarrassing from a 60 year old man.
 
The entire reason for the title change is so people are fooled into thinking it is a different movie entirely and the click on it for the required amount of time for Netflix to count that as a view before turning it off. It's very blatant
 
The entire reason for the title change is so people are fooled into thinking it is a different movie entirely and the click on it for the required amount of time for Netflix to count that as a view before turning it off. It's very blatant

Views don't work like that anymore. Since June 2021 Netflix looks at the total number of minutes viewed and divides that by the running time of the film to get the number of views.
 
The director's cut of Part I is being retitled "Chalice of Blood".
39702145-cdf0-444f-916d-ddbb252f36a9_text.gif


Such pathetic over the top juvenile edgelord garbage is so embarrassing from a 60 year old man.

:lmao:

Rebel Moon Part One: Chalice of Blood

Rebel Moon Part One: Child of Fire

That sure wont confuse anyone…
 
That is absolutely part of the goal, and is probably an indicator of just how successful the movies actually were.
 
That is absolutely part of the goal, and is probably an indicator of just how successful the movies actually were.

So they only now decided on this title for the director's cut to dupe people into watching the movie (well, the first few minutes more likely) again? Even though Snyder has been saying that in his mind the director's cuts are almost an entirely different movie since the very beginning?

Look, I get that people don't like Snyder and his movies. I myself made fun of both Rebel Moon films in this very thread. But the way people get conspiratorial with this stuff ("Deborah Snyder is lying about why they made two cuts" and "they're trying to dupe people with the title") feels a little unhinged.
 
So they only now decided on this title for the director's cut to dupe people into watching the movie (well, the first few minutes more likely) again? Even though Snyder has been saying that in his mind the director's cuts are almost an entirely different movie since the very beginning?

Look, I get that people don't like Snyder and his movies. I myself made fun of both Rebel Moon films in this very thread. But the way people get conspiratorial with this stuff ("Deborah Snyder is lying about why they made two cuts" and "they're trying to dupe people with the title") feels a little unhinged.

I just put the stupid name on Snyder.

All the rest of it, for allowing an entirely different name to dupe people into checking out a director's cut for a few movies I put on Netflix. Netflix, who controls who sees the numbers and determines what the numbers mean. Its pretty damn clear that Snyder is buying whatever bull**** Netflix is telling him about the numbers.
 
I have no problem with edgy titles...i listen to a lot of metal and know a thing or two about that.
But Snyder is so weirdly cringy with it for no reason.

A lot snyder does, feels like He isnt really convinced of the stuff He does himself.
The constant Directors cuts, title changes, the way He flip flops on this and that in Interviews.
Feels like He doesnt seem to have a clear Vision on things.
 
Was there a Chalice of Blood in the first movie? Just curious because I blocked a lot of it out.

I guess it could be a metaphor, of course. It sounds like a subtitle to a Castlevania game.
 
Imagine the state of cinema if talented directors like Nolan and Villeneuve always relied on this whole "wait for my directors cut" approach?
 
Imagine the state of cinema if talented directors like Nolan and Villeneuve always relied on this whole "wait for my directors cut" approach?
Villeneuve might laugh at the title given that chalice is standard French Canadian swearing.

That's what I thought about too.
 
Was there a Chalice of Blood in the first movie? Just curious because I blocked a lot of it out.

I guess it could be a metaphor, of course. It sounds like a subtitle to a Castlevania game.
Someone explained it in the last page and yes it's one of those there's deep lore of it everywhere but the movie itself.
 
So here's something funny. There's a short 25-minute making-of video on Netflix and it's divided into segments e.g. "Veldt" or "Jimmy" and then you get to this:

wheat.jpg

That's right, they devote time to talking about just the wheat (they planted it all themselves). At one point Deborah Snyder says ""Wheat is this character in our film and it was super important that the wheat be real because we wanted to actually harvest it and if it was fake we couldn't actually cut the wheat and bundle it. It wouldn't have been realistic" and Snyder adds "One of the things that actually drove the schedule was where the wheat was at its correct ripeness for harvesting". And then a producer goes "we let the wheat tell us when it would be ready to be shot".
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"