WeaponXProject
Triple bladed shave.
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2006
- Messages
- 2,883
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 31
I'm sorry but No Country for Old Men was a terrible film. If you want to look at it in quality, there was no climax, almost the entire film was left up to inference, there was no music, and the only real Tragic Hero in the movie was Sheriff Bell, and he wasn't even the main focus. Chigurh's character contradicted himself in practically everyscene and moreso in the movie because at least in the book you kind of have an idea as to why he's doing what he's doing. The book was just as bad, too much gun talk, not enough detail on necessary things but too much detail on uneeded stuff (like guns and dead bodies). There was 0 punctuation used and there were no quotation marks. No Country for Old Men was one of THE worst movies and books I have ever scene and read.
I don't care if you have 13000 + posts. That is just flat out ******ed what you just wrote. People didn't like the movie because it didn't follow the typical Hollywood system of its acts. It's climax was lifted away. The villian wins. The theme of the book and movie was in the title. And it ended ubruptly. Boo hoo. I'll take this over any simple minded formatted movie over that last 30 years. You had no idea where the story was to end. The movie left you thinking.
There's just too much to even say about this I'm so annoyed.