BullMcGiveny
Probably Disagree
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2012
- Messages
- 2,940
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 31
No, speno is right.No, Black Widow is the co-lead because it fits into the themes of the movie, and because the Winter Soldier is in the movie.
Black Widow fits the themes, but then so would any SHIELD agent, including Sharon. And sure she had a relationship with the Winter Soldier, but Steve's past with Bucky is what really matters.
Scarjo being a more bankable star and her being a fixture from the Avengers are definitely reasons why I'm sure Marvel nudged the screenwriters to focus on her.
Well truth is we know nothing about the actual screen time for Sharon in the movie. It may surprise all of us.
So long as the writing's there and EVC's given a chance to make Sharon a memorable personality, I'm good even if she's not co-lead.
I'd have been fine if she wasn't co-lead, but it goes beyond that. Not only is she not the co-lead (frankly I don't think anyone should be co-lead, Steve is the only lead there should be), she isn't the female lead, she isn't a major supporting either.
She's absent from set footage, press material and trailers.
So it's a question of whether she has three minutes of screentime or five. Not much of a chance to be memorable, there.
Even if it is good writing and a good scene she's in, she'll most assuredly be completely overshadowed by Natasha's much larger role.
And come Captain America 3, who are audiences and the production crew be more interested in, the character who was co-lead in the last movie, or someone who was there for five minutes?