If they are told to check out a back issue to understand a story but can't afford to buy it or don't want to buy it then they won't understand what's going on. Don't you get that some people can't and don't want to buy back issue's. They just want to buy the new stories and enjoy them.
Please read this carefully,
I said the option is left open to the reader to
track down an issue.
No one has to spend there money in anyway they don't want to. I guess your pretty mad that their going to reference the clone saga soon...huh?
Did you believe I was saying they should have an editorial caption with no recap? NO!
1.
Your dismissing examples of Spidey using his spider sense in ways you don't see today because of the decade they're in. You're not supporting the use of continuity, you're supporting the continuity YOU want.
No, I've clearly stated that they've messed it up before. I'm not hand picking continuity, I'm going with what is the set definition of Spidey sense, his reflexes reacting to instinct. The one EVERYBODY knows. Even non comic readers know Spider sense is his danger sense. I even have a quote to back me up off of Marvel's own official website.
Your making such a big argument about his Spider sense being different all the time, but you neglect the fact that
he has used it this way before. It's not different this time. All the points you brought up were different uses of his Spider sense which have been ignored and written back in without him thinking its a new way to use his powers which he's had since he was a teen.
2.
Arguements are either pointless or have a point. If a company or writer makes an argument and then a poster makes the same argument, the worth of that argument doesn't change. If you argue that something Marvel says is pointless then you are arguing that when I say the same thing it is also pointless.
I wasn't really thinking of you when I said it, but ok.
I'm not going to change my opinion because you don't like it....
I respect your opinions and I hope you respect mine as well.
I'm really sorry if you felt offended. I honestly mean that.
Someone may have read it, but that doesn't mean Mark Waid read it. Is it even still in print?
Amazon has about 20, 9 used-11 new for good deals. I've also seen it in libraries, that's how I read it at least.
I think if your trying to write a title like Spidey you have to be a bit more on the ball. Aside from the Spidey sense thing, I liked the issue.
I love Mark Waid. Don't get me wrong this isn't the first time I complained about Spidey-sense in recent years. I didn't care for when JMS leveled it up to the point that Peter could tell how many fingers MJ held to the back of his head.
That STORY is important, the fact that it was released in trade isn't. The Frank Miller collection was released on the strenght of Miller's name not the strenght of the stories.
I'm sorry, You said TPB's mean nothing.
Fans always know more about ASM than the writers, fans know more about everything than the creators. Because fans are obessive about the past, whereas writers have to expel the past to think off the future.
Check this out.
Key words in bold.
It's kinda like, why would you want a writer on ASM that knows
way less about the book than fans? People use that against JMS ALL the time, but never against Brand new day!
JMS was criticised because he didn't know things like how MJ found out Peter was Spider-Man, which is a lot different than not knowing he went blind in some random issue.
Exactly what I said earlier. Because he knew way less history than the fans did. His run started falling apart halfway in. Why would anyone else want someone like that? That ignores the past.
I really don't think you read my posts.
Those levels mean nothing. Just read comics. Daredevil is the match for Kingpin, Kingpin is a match for Spider-Man. According to the power levels that doesn't make sense.
Again, I've said his levels change and thats something I'm kinda tired of.
It's the whole point of this argument. Ignorance with Spidey's powers.
(Now I know you don't read my posts before you reply)
In recent stories it's been fixed and tightened. (Which is what I really want.) Spidey has beaten the crap out of kingpin during Black in black. He doesn't even deal with Kingpin anymore. DD is kingpins enemy now and they better suit each other. Your referencing old classic stories with nostalgic karate chops and judo body fat in more contemporary times.
The kingpin was first introduced as a character that could punch craters in the ground. That doesn't make Spidey look any weaker.
In early stories, spidey always bested him though. But was shocked by how fast and strong the guy actually was. (his looks were deceiving)
Kingpin has always been portrayed as a more than average strength character. You could say the same thing about Ox. But I'm glad that they are tightening up on that bit of continuity. These characters should be able to hurt Spidey but never beat him in a fight fair and square. Which has never happened.
I doubt writers even look at that crap.
Evidently they don't!
As for why the explain the spider-sense rather than his other powers? It's because the spider sense is abstract, eveything else you can see and understand easily.
In short, we can make up things as much as we want because its not a visible power. Kinda odd since they've added layers to prof. X's powers without convoluting it or making things he can already do seem like new.
The complaint about the spider sense is grasphing at straws and trying to find a reason not to like the story
I said I liked the story. I love Mark Waid. I don't like when writers ignore certain aspects about peter, whether it be him, his powers, or his supporting cast. I disliked one aspect about the 24/7 story but you forced it into this large argument like I'm looking for things to hate. Nooooo sir. I'd give it at least a 4/5. I think it was that good.