Annoyances

Edd Extraordinaire said:
The official story goes as follows:

WTC: The jet fuel from the plane melted the steel causing the collapse.

The Pentagon: A Boeing 757 crashed into the Pentagon. The official story is that the plane and its passengers disintegrated on impact.

Flight 93: Passengers tried to take over the hijacked plane, and the result is the crash. The official story is that the plane and its passengers disintegrated on impact.

OK, so maybe the WTC collapse *could* be attributed to a chain reaction of a precisely placed initial impact. Other than that ,what do you think happened?
 
oakzap425 said:
^^
WTF? Why did that post seem ******ed to me?

Just a theory I heard on one of the many talk shows. I guess is makes some degree of sense. Although it's kind of splitting hairs.
 
49erVenom said:
OK, so maybe the WTC collapse *could* be attributed to a chain reaction of a precisely placed initial impact. Other than that ,what do you think happened?

To go on the WTC real quick, I believe that it was controlled demolition. That is all.

At the Pentagon....Probably a drone or a missle. The video footage they released shows nothing that looks like a boeing 757(or767, whatever.). Another thing is that there was almost no wreckage. It's impossible to think that the engines could have disintegrated, considering the fact that they were made out of titanium. In fact, the only engine they did find was too small to have been on a 757.

In Shenksville....If you do a little research, you'll find an article about the mayor of Cleveland declaring that Flight 93 landed in Cincinatti airport and evacuated its passengers. You'll then read more that a passenger of another flight grounded at the same airport will report witnessing the passengers being escorted into an evacuated NASA hangar. While I know this may be a little hard to swallow, it's all there. Not to mention they didn't find any wreckage that would usually be found at a crash site. Like wings, engines, seats, bodies, etc. Nothing but little shards and such were found. Just look at the pictures from the site, you don't see squat.
 
Edd Extraordinaire said:
To go on the WTC real quick, I believe that it was controlled demolition. That is all.

At the Pentagon....Probably a drone or a missle. The video footage they released shows nothing that looks like a boeing 757(or767, whatever.). Another thing is that there was almost no wreckage. It's impossible to think that the engines could have disintegrated, considering the fact that they were made out of titanium. In fact, the only engine they did find was too small to have been on a 757.

In Shenksville....If you do a little research, you'll find an article about the mayor of Cleveland declaring that Flight 93 landed in Cincinatti airport and evacuated its passengers. You'll then read more that a passenger of another flight grounded at the same airport will report witnessing the passengers being escorted into an evacuated NASA hangar. While I know this may be a little hard to swallow, it's all there. Not to mention they didn't find any wreckage that would usually be found at a crash site. Like wings, engines, seats, bodies, etc. Nothing but little shards and such were found. Just look at the pictures from the site, you don't see squat.

There are transformers on each floor of a building that can also contribute to the collapse of the building. They blow up and there ya go.
 
tzarinna said:
There are transformers on each floor of a building that can also contribute to the collapse of the building. They blow up and there ya go.

And your evidence?
 
Edd Extraordinaire said:
To go on the WTC real quick, I believe that it was controlled demolition. That is all.

By who? You don't think those gigantic planes brough down the Towers?

At the Pentagon....Probably a drone or a missle. The video footage they released shows nothing that looks like a boeing 757(or767, whatever.). Another thing is that there was almost no wreckage. It's impossible to think that the engines could have disintegrated, considering the fact that they were made out of titanium. In fact, the only engine they did find was too small to have been on a 757.

There were calls from the passengers stating the flight had been hijacked. As far as the engines: heat+impact+collapse= not much left.

In Shenksville....If you do a little research, you'll find an article about the mayor of Cleveland declaring that Flight 93 landed in Cincinatti airport and evacuated its passengers. You'll then read more that a passenger of another flight grounded at the same airport will report witnessing the passengers being escorted into an evacuated NASA hangar. While I know this may be a little hard to swallow, it's all there. Not to mention they didn't find any wreckage that would usually be found at a crash site. Like wings, engines, seats, bodies, etc. Nothing but little shards and such were found. Just look at the pictures from the site, you don't see squat.

I've heard the theories of the Flight 93 being evacuated. That's way, way out there. The idea that some other kind of aircraft involved in bringing it down may have some validity but that doesn't change the overall picture for me.
 
49erVenom said:
I've heard the theories of the Flight 93 being evacuated. That's way, way out there. The idea that some other kind of aircraft involved in bringing it down may have some validity but that doesn't change the overall picture for me.

The phone calls were phony. Research the Achilles project, it proves that before 2004, cell phones on planes had a success rate of close to impossible.
 
49erVenom said:
There were calls from the passengers stating the flight had been hijacked. As far as the engines: heat+impact+collapse= not much left.

But still, the engines couldn't have been destroyed. It's almost impossible.
 
Edd Extraordinaire said:
And your evidence?


I said can,based on the size of the electrical transformer they can do some serious damage. Have a bunch of them explode in a chain reaction wouldn't be so far fetched. This was a major impact on a building that I'm sure had a large power need.
 
But what about reports from people about the basement exploding 5-10 seconds before the plane actually hit?
 
I'll ask my instructor when I go to class on Wed night.
But I'm pretty sure they could have contrbuted to all those explosions.
I've seen the remains of a small bus duct after an explosion for a small office building and that was a result of water.
 
Edd Extraordinaire said:
The phone calls were phony. Research the Achilles project, it proves that before 2004, cell phones on planes had a success rate of close to impossible.

OK, I just looked at that website in your sig and it's complete dung. We may not know all the details of 9/11 but the idea that it was the U.S. gov't is laughable. There were some massive screw-ups. It was not the work of some political Illuminati. Those theories are put out by people who've watched one too many episodes of the X-Files.
I was on a plane in '98 and saw people making cell phone calls. Moreoever, it's completely logical that any kind of metal could be destroyed under the right circumstances.
I'm not going to post any more in this thread because it will go too far off topic. I truly hope you aren't buying into the swill on that site, Edd.
 
It annoys the crap out of me when people derail Drak's Annoyances thread with 9-11 conspiracy junk. :cmad:
 
Edd Extraordinaire said:
But what about reports from people about the basement exploding 5-10 seconds before the plane actually hit?


I don't know.That seems a little odd.
But the switch gear (feeds the building) is typically in the basement/garage of buildings.
 
tzarinna said:
I don't know.That seems a little odd.
But the switch gear (feeds the building) is typically in the basement/garage of buildings.

Why would it explode before the plane hit?
 
Edd Extraordinaire said:
Why would it explode before the plane hit?


I don't know but you can't believe everything you read.
 
It annoys me when someone has their sigs in a foreign language. What, can't you type in English??? :mad:
 
Danger Mouse said:
It annoys me when someone has their sigs in a foreign language. What, can't you type in English??? :mad:
Yeah! Go back to Canada I tells em'! :cmad:
 
people who are excessively stupid annoy me. I'm sorry but if you find it a challenge to operate a till at mcdonalds (despite the buttons with the cow and the chicken on them) this world is not for you :cmad::cmad::cmad:
 
There's this kid in computer class who is so dumb it hurts. It's annoying.
 
it gets worse the higher up the chain you go

moron.jpg
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,294
Messages
22,081,665
Members
45,881
Latest member
lucindaschatz
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"