Answering script questions: DO NOT OPEN UNLESS YOU WANT TO SPOIL THE WHOLE MOVIE

[Gamma Warrior]

If you mean lifting a small continent (flat out impossible as that kind of mass and weight lifted by something the size of a man would be like trying to balance a few hundred pounds of soft butter on the head of a needle) Then I personally hope not (nor is that likely in any case from the sounds of things).

Don't get me wrong, I don't mind Hulk's strength being very impressive and even borderline absurd (it ought to be really) but I'd rather they avoid the more outrageous feats of strength Superman is often shown doing (like his lifting a huge yacht out of the sea supporting it's entire weight on the simple metal rail he is holding with one hand).

I prefer hitting power. Like apparently knocking the huge piece of ice into the sea!

 

[Sarg92]

Damn, and there are multiples like that?!?!

He doesn't do any bigger than that not unless big changes were made. The College Campus scene is very impressive and Hulk's strength is shown really well.

Get ya shields!

 

[Silver Knight]

He doesn't do any bigger than that not unless big changes were made. The College Campus scene is very impressive and Hulk's strength is shown really well.

Get ya shields!

Can to explain in more detail.

 

[Sarg92]

Can to explain in more detail.

Spoiler

Hulk tears a 20ft metal sculpture so he has two massive 20ft metal plates in his hands and Hulk is only 9ft. He uses the plates as shields from the massive onslaught from the military and as weapons. Later in the scene Hulk smashes the two plates together like cymbals after undergoing A LOT of pain creating a sonic sound effect. And then Hulk hurls one of the 20ft metal plates into the sky at a helicopter like a discus thrower slicing the helicopter in half.

 

[Gamma Warrior]

It's amazing! The Ice Structure thing sounds awesome!

 

[Karea07]

will this movie be very different than lee's version (as in less story and more action?)

which story is better?

 

[Silver Knight]

Spoiler

Hulk tears a 20ft metal sculpture so he has two massive 20ft metal plates in his hands and Hulk is only 9ft. He uses the plates as shields from the massive onslaught from the military and as weapons. Later in the scene Hulk smashes the two plates together like cymbals after undergoing A LOT of pain creating a sonic sound effect. And then Hulk hurls one of the 20ft metal plates into the sky at a helicopter like a discus thrower slicing the helicopter in half.

Sounds amazing!!

Can't wait!

 

[y2as]

Hi guy, after reading this thread I am highly anticipating this movie. I am a casual Hulk fan, probably not following the comics/cartoons as religiously as others. But I feel that Hulk needs to evolve for the movie.

For me the comics having Grey Hulk etc.. are a unneccessary distraction from the main character, Green Hulk. I dont think any other colored Hulk should ever be seen on the big screen.

For me personally Hulk is a manifestation of anger and rage, so if anyone confronts him with lethal force he responds back with anger and rage, I think him killing people who try to cause harm to him is reasonable.

Ps this is all my opinion so don't slaughter me lol

 

[y2as]

He's a superhero in my eyes.



If a writer has a superhero killing innocent people, that writer should not be working in superhero comics, as far as I'm concerned.

I see where your coming from, but sometimes concepts and ideas will evolve, perhaps not to your taste but others may like it.

I think it makes sense since Hulk is a monster born out of anger and rage to be able to kill in self defence anyways. What keeps him sane is the humanity that is inside the hulk (Banner). Thats my take on new interpretation of Hulk.

Also not to forget Hulk is a very powerful individual and him hitting someone should be fatal if not dangerous. In my eyes this gives the military more justifcation for hunting down the Hulk. This is not a cartoon but a live action movie.

 

[Cracker Jack]

Think of it this way, in Spider-Man 3 and the part where Aunt May says "Spider-Man doesn't kill anyone." She was shocked to think that Spider-Man might have killed someone. Even uncle Ben's killer. Same goes for the Hulk. and besides that, He doesn't in the movie and it's all moot. Welcome aboard y2as. This should be a fun ride t:

 

[TheSlag]

other than Emil's transformation into Abomb, i dont mind the other things in the script. I'm sorry but Hulk accidentally killing people should happen cause it will, if there was a Hulk in the real world. I always thought that and hated the BS stuff from the comics where Hulk would level buildings but no one would get killed

A... Frickin... Men...

 

[TheSlag]

There's no "inevitability" about it. Anything that happens in the movie is predetermined? . And it should be decided beforehand that he won't kill anyone.

The "inevitability" of it IS... It should be realistic and keep you in the moment. And a Hulk in the real world, with that amount of Power and Rage would DEFINITELY be a deadly and LETHAL force to the unfortunate "puny humans" around him.

And that... is a Beeeeautiful thing IMO.

 

[TheSlag]

But there's never gonna be a Hulk in the real world, is there? You make him a killer, you make him a monster, you make him the villain, you make Ross the hero.

The Hulk should be a Monster. I don't want no stikin CareBear Smurf Dancin In CandyLand Hulk. We can still see the heroic side in this Anti-Hero. Without the death of innocents, it will be a hollow version of what the Hulk should be.

But fear not Smurfer's... I FEAR there will be no death of the innocent Puny Humans in this Hulk Movie. Which will be a terrible shame IMO.

 

[TheSlag]

lol, Hulk accidentally killing someone doesnt make him a killer, you show it from his point of view, you show that he was defending himself and people got killiied, that he didnt want to kill them but they got in the way and he couldnt save them. We, the audience see that and we dont go "that mother f**ker just killed people"... we understand that the guys' going to get blamed for that too when he didnt want to do anything.

ExSMACKly... Preach my Brother.

 

[TheSlag]

So you don't see anything wrong with innocent people getting killed by the supposed hero?

Nope. But, I also would not consider the Hulk a Hero in the truest sense of the word. His story does not, nor should not, have anything to do with him (Hulk) being a Hero. Especially when dealing with fatalities of innocents caught in the crossfire between him and Abom.

 

[TheSlag]

Well I do, so ... end of conversation.

LOL... WELL... if you Say so.

 

[S_H_F_4839]

I think it is perfectly understandable that their would be casualties from the hulks battles, but something I want to see that will set the hulk aside is sympathy. Picture this the hulk is fighting the abomination and a child is accidentally killed in their exchange. A frantic mother clutching to the child screaming for help and the hulk look at the child confused not sure what has happened. I always thought of him as childlike focused soley on the object that has brought on his rage, yet if he does not have any sympathy for those caught in the crossfire he might as well be the abomination.

 

[AVEITWITHJAMON]

I see where your coming from, but sometimes concepts and ideas will evolve, perhaps not to your taste but others may like it.

I think it makes sense since Hulk is a monster born out of anger and rage to be able to kill in self defence anyways. What keeps him sane is the humanity that is inside the hulk (Banner). Thats my take on new interpretation of Hulk.

Also not to forget Hulk is a very powerful individual and him hitting someone should be fatal if not dangerous. In my eyes this gives the military more justifcation for hunting down the Hulk. This is not a cartoon but a live action movie.

Exactly, which makes the military the good guys of the story, which is ****ing ridiculous in a HULK movie.

Think of it this way, in Spider-Man 3 and the part where Aunt May says "Spider-Man doesn't kill anyone." She was shocked to think that Spider-Man might have killed someone. Even uncle Ben's killer. Same goes for the Hulk. and besides that, He doesn't in the movie and it's all moot. Welcome aboard y2as. This should be a fun ride t:

About the Spiderman referance, SPOT ON, that was meant to show how much the Symbiote had influenced Peter's mind at that point, and it was a very good scene.

And I genuinly hope you are right about the removal of the scene in question.

I think it is perfectly understandable that their would be casualties from the hulks battles, but something I want to see that will set the hulk aside is sympathy. Picture this the hulk is fighting the abomination and a child is accidentally killed in their exchange. A frantic mother clutching to the child screaming for help and the hulk look at the child confused not sure what has happened. I always thought of him as childlike focused soley on the object that has brought on his rage, yet if he does not have any sympathy for those caught in the crossfire he might as well be the abomination.

I think this would be an acceptable compromise, if Hulk does indeed kill anyone in the movie, then he should be distraught about it.

 

[afan]

Picture this the hulk is fighting the abomination and a child is accidentally killed in their exchange. A frantic mother clutching to the child screaming for help and the hulk look at the child confused not sure what has happened. I always thought of him as childlike focused soley on the object that has brought on his rage, yet if he does not have any sympathy for those caught in the crossfire he might as well be the abomination.

That scenario IMO would do irreperable harm to the character, no matter how much sympathy The Hulk demonstrates, the death of a child will not sit well with the audience at all. The collateral death of soldiers is one matter( tho personally even that detail bothers me), the death of a child is quite another.

The Hulk should be a Monster.

I disagree totally, The Hulk is not a "monster", he is perceived as such and mercilessly hounded by authority. That's a cornerstone of the character, and creates pity for his plight.
If portrayed as a monster the audience cannot look at him in a sympathetic way, and any crusade to destroy him becomes justifiable.

 

[Cracker Jack]

The Hulk should be a Monster. I don't want no stikin CareBear Smurf Dancin In CandyLand Hulk. Without the death of innocents, it will be a hollow version of what the Hulk should be.

But fear not Smurfer's... I FEAR there will be no death of the innocent Puny Humans in this Hulk Movie. Which will be a terrible shame IMO.

If this is the way you see the Hulk then I get the feeling that you don't know the character at all.

 

[TOUGHINGTON]

hulk should kill just un intentially. thats realistic. i mean i believe he ends up killing the abomination at the end anyway. thats killing isn't it. and thats deliberate yet i dont think too many people will say thats un heroic. soldiers went to war against the Nazis and killed and were regarded in many cases as heros. Im right as im English with a hint of summer Cypriot

 

[Docker2.0]

What's the budget for this movie?

 

[S_H_F_4839]

That scenario IMO would do irreperable harm to the character, no matter how much sympathy The Hulk demonstrates, the death of a child will not sit well with the audience at all. The collateral death of soldiers is one matter( tho personally even that detail bothers me), the death of a child is quite another.

Thats sort of the reason I mentioned that scenario not to do damage to the character, but to point out that in extreme situations things like this happen. I am saying that if the hulk got into a fight with someone like the abomination in a major metropolitian city, the casualties would not just be soldiers there would be innocents in there that would lose their lives as a result of the battle. It would also help in giving the military even more reason to stop him like a previous poster said.

 

[Sava]

What's the budget for this movie?

180 or higher

 

[Docker2.0]

Wow! that's A LOT! Honestly, I want this movie to do well, but I think due to the last movie, it might not. There is no hype for this movie at all. They should have some teaser trailer for this movie to get people pumped for it like they are doing for Iron Man. I don't know.........Marvel isn't handling this movie very well right now.