WORLD'S FINEST: SUPERMAN
It had to happen, my views and ideas on
Superman, which is ironic, because I don't and have never regularly read his ongoing title, but god, do I love his character. He has already been the subject of a short column before, where I sought to defend the character against the constant critique of being a worthless overpowered boyscout. Let's get one thing clear: Superman is an icon.
"Rocketed to Earth from the Planet Krypton by his parents, Jor-El and Lara, young Kal-El was raised as Clark Kent in Smallville, Kansas by Jonathan and Martha Kent. Over the course of his teenage years young Clark Kent started to develop strange new powers, giving him the ability to be faster than a speeding bullet, be more powerful than a locomotive and allow him to leap tall buildings in a single bound!"
My version of Superman would borrow quite heavily from the Richard Donner movies, concerning mostly his teenage years and the appearance his Fortress of Solitude. If I had to point out one man as the most important influence on me when it comes to Superman, it would have to be Christopher Reeve. Especially, and bear with me on this one, the scene in
Superman II where Clark Kent returns to the diner where, in his depowered state, had been humiliated by a local bully. Returning to the diner, now fully powered again, Clark trounces the bully in seconds, finishing it up with the typical goofy smile Reeve portrayed so well. Pushing his glasses back on his nose, he kindly pays the bartender for the damage and leaves again. This scene, mostly played for laughs, established one powerful notion in me: The most important piece in the name "Superman" was not "Super" but "man". Clark Kent was fallible, prone to jealousy and a need for revenge. Superman was
human.
It would be this element I would most prominently feature in my stories, namely that the Clark Kent part of his life is just as important as the Superman part. Unlike what some writers will tell you, I staunchly believe that ultimately, Kal-El, Clark Kent and Superman are the same person. Clark Kent isn't Kal-El or Superman acting out a part, nor is that true vice versa. They are all facets of one man. Of course Clark will modulate his voice somewhat when in the guise of Superman, and will carry with him a more natural air of authority, but these are not things he suddenly abandons when he dons the glasses. This is why I find Ed McGuinness one of the artists best suited to Superman. He was never afraid to show Clark with that same air of authority, and we could see that behind the glasses and the looser clothes (heck, what fabric isn't looser than spandex?) there was still that same man.
But then, who is this one man? I can't call him anything but Clark Kent, but in the manner of Clark Kent as the man that houses all three facets that make up his being. Thing is, he's been Clark Kent for the majority of his life, was raised as Clark Kent etc. etc. and I don't think he should ever ask anyone to start calling him Kal(-El). The Superman I would write would be extremely proud and interested in his heritage of course, but not in the manner that some have tried to portray him, namely as a cold, inhuman thing.
To me, Clark would not necessarily be an "outcast" from society because he's actually from a different planet, but because he has powers that come with an enormous responsibility. Superman is forever alone not because he's from Krypton, but because there's no one that can really, truly, understand what he goes through. Superman's hearing is so fine that he can hear every second of the day of people calling for his help, people he cannot and sometimes chooses not to help. Even if he's been able to tune out most of these sounds, he still has a burden to bear that cannot be understood by any other man.
To be strong enough to move planets.
To be fast enough to attain 99% of light-speed.
To have all these awesome powers, and to be forced to accept one dreadful thing:
That he can never save them all.
That is the defining paradigm of Superman to me. To live with the knowledge that although you are almost like a god, that even then, you'll never be strong or fast enough to save everybody. To make the choice between two disasters. It is exactly this realization that I figure is what makes Clark such a human character. He is fallible, he's not perfect, he knows this and he
has to live with it.
It is here that the parallel is drawn with Lex Luthor, a man suffering from the same problem; having to accept that he's not perfect and admitting it to himself, which Luthor can't. This segues nicely into his hatred for Superman, because ultimately, Lex Luthor is afraid that Superman is
better, and he can't live with that kind of person exisitng. The way I see it, Superman is essentially holding up a great big mirror to Luthor, saying: "You may think you're a big shot, and you may have gotten everyone to believe it, but you and I know the real score." Superman doesn't do it consciously, but his entire existence alone tells this story. The thing is, Luthor knows, deep down, that Superman isn't perfect either, but y'see, Superman has
accepted that. After all, with age comes wisdom, and Superman's learned that there are just some things you can't change. Perhaps, in this, Luthor shows a much greater capacity for ambition than Superman. Luthor will never stop striving to be the absolute and utter best.
As for Luthor's role as archnemesis and villain, I'd go for the approach that Morrison did during his
JLA run. The mad scientist mixed in with the businessman. Basically, I'd have him be like the Lex Luthor that Alexander Luthor portrayed during the whole Infinite Crisis thing. Cool, calm, collected and utterly ruthless. The only thing that can crack that cool is Superman, whom he truly and utterly hates.
Then there's Lois Lane. The final puzzle piece in what I call Superman's Trinity. Him, Luthor and his wife Lois. Unlike a lot of people, I have no problem with Clark getting together with Lois. He couldn't pine after her forever, and the two match up well. The important thing to note immediately though, is that Lois isn't like other superhero wives. Let's be honest here, they're married to superheroes, she's married to
Superman. That can be an incredibly fulfilling experience, but it can also be a very lonely one.
My inspiration for Lois would come from two rather recent interpretations of her: Teri Hatcher's Lois from Lois & Clark, and the Lois that Geoff Johns and Kurt Busiek wrote for Up, Up and Away. Headstrong, sexy and not afraid to speak her mind while also having a nurturing side to her. Too often though, writers tend to look to an extreme of her and Clark's relationship. They are either the perfect couple that never fight or they are the worst couple in which one doesn't really love the other (thank you Chuck Austen). I say, let there be balance. These are human people, so they will argue, and they will fight and they will get fed up with one another once in a blue moon. That's how it
should be.
So we've established Superman's own identity and his connection to the two most prominent figures in his life: Lex Luthor and Lois Lane. The rest of Superman's cast breaks down into: Smallville, the Daily Planet and the JLA. First off, Smallville. The most prominent members of that cast are definitely Clark's adoptive parents. I love them, and they'd definitely be recurring characters. Not because they're such great characters, but because I think it's great how a grown man like Clark will still take the time to look up his parents every few days.
Then there's Lana Lang and Pete Ross. God, have they been messed with in the last few years. Some really shoddy characterization and these two need to get back together quickly. Pete Ross raising their son alone in Smallville? Yeah, one of the first things I would definitely change is for these two to get back together. Gradually, but these two are meant for one another, and writers need to stop making Lana desperate for Clark. They were each other's first loves and that will never change, but they shouldn't be more than the very best of friends. They should be able to call each other up in the middle of the night to talk. The same goes for Pete Ross. They would not always be around but jump in for a quick one-page jaunt here and there.
Second is the cast of the Daily Planet, which basically translates to Perry White and Jimmy Olsen. Let's get this clear right off the bat: Perry knows. As for their relation to Clark, I once again let myself be inspired by Up, Up and Away. Jimmy, although a sociable guy, really has only one friend, who is Clark. It can be a bit of a strain on their friendship, since in the end, Jimmy is far more dependant on Clark than the other way around, and let's be honest, Jimmy idiolizes Clark. Even more than he idiolizes Superman.
The Daily Planet would figure immensely in my first arc, where Perry asks Clark to take the job of temporary foreign correspondent in the Middle-East. As just about the only member of his staff that can survive in that turmoil, Clark's a natural choice, but it changes his life, at least for the duration of the job, completely. It'd be a nice status quo change for a while, because when Clark finally returns to Metropolis, he'll find things have changed rather dramatically. How? Honestly, I'm not exactly sure yet, but it would do nicely to change aspects of Superman's life, and to actually have the characters respond to that. No unnecessary deaths or random acts of violence. No, real actual character development for these characters, which is about time as far as I'm concerned.
Now, finally, there are the superhero connections. There are five characters that stand out for me here; Batman, Wonder Woman, Martian Manhunter, Nightwing and Flash (Jay Garrick). I will start off with the character some of you may feel doesn't really fit in, namely Jay Garrick. While everybody of the modern age of heroes looks up to Superman, Superman looks up to the golden age of heroes, and when I see him do that, I see him thinking of Jay Garrick. Everybody goes insane over Alan Scott, and deservedly so, but I think Superman would be more inspired by Jay. Jay Garrick truly comes across as the perfect superhero and more importantly as the perfect
man (and I mean that both in the human sense as in the being male sense). To Superman, if there is one man that he knows will always try his hardest to do the right thing (and will, the majority of the time, do it), then that man is Jay Garrick.
Next, there is Nightwing. Yes, Dick Grayson, former Robin. I've always liked the relationship between these two. They are essentially like brothers. While Batman is Nightwing's father and mentor, Superman is like his cool older brother. As such, I'd occassionally have Dick give Clark a ring, come over for dinner, go to a sports game, that kind of thing. With all the troubles Nightwing has been through, a stable presence in the form of Superman is welcome.
The Martian Manhunter and Superman have a lot in common. They are both the not-really-last-of-their-kind, and gives them a natural bond. Thing is though, the reason they're good friends is not because of that but because J'onn and Clark just plain have the same kind of interests, and both have this natural authority around them. They have both given up more for this superhero business than one should ever have to do, but they do it anyway, and they do it without *****ing about it.
Wonder Woman. What can you say about her?
Wonder Woman (latest volume) #226 dedicated pretty much the entire issue to their relationship. The most discussed element of their friendship by the fans is easily about whether or not Diana and Clark should be a couple. My take: Wonder Woman belongs with Batman and Superman is so fiercely loyal to Lois that he remained celibate for a 1000 years, stuck in Asgard with Wonder Woman. Nothing will ever change that. The very best of friends, but these two will never be lovers.
Lastly, there is the Batman. The darkness to Superman's light. The best of friends. No, that's not correct. Bruce is a brother. Both come from a single child family and have known in some ways a life of solitude. Besides his conncetion with Lois, he holds no greater bond with anyone else but Batman. Which is exactly why I would like to see them hanging out more as Clark and Bruce rather than as Superman and Batman. I wouldn't feature Bats more than an occasional guest-spot, but every time would be a special one, rather it be in their superhero or civilian lives.
I know what you might be wondering: Where does that leave the Superman-inspired characters Steel, Power Girl, Supergirl and Krypto? Although he wears the big S, I don't really consider Steel a Superman character anymore. He's grown beyond that, but that doesn't mean I wouldn't feature him from time to time. Very sparingly though, since he doesn't really fit in anymore. The same goes for Power Girl. She's JSA, and although she rediscovered her "superheritage", I don't see much benefit from having her interact more with Clark. Krypto is awesome incarnate as a dog, but to have that come out properly, he'd also appear only occasionally. Lastly, Supergirl, well, I don't like her, and thus I'd keep her out. She's off in her own title and that's fine by me.