Anyone else think that Cerebro in X-Men, X2, and probably X3, has been a big waste ?

BT18

Superhero
Joined
Jun 25, 2004
Messages
5,850
Reaction score
0
Points
31
of money, shooting days, and screentime?

I think it's the perfect example of unneccessary CGI. It actually cost alot more than many people realize. They had to sacrifice, among other possibilities, the Danger Room, something that is actually in many ways actual CGI in the storyline, as in, images to the characters created by computer technology (if it's the more modern representation of the Danger Room).

Cerebro was never some massive, conspicuous, earth-mother eye candy fest in the comics, not the classic comics anyway.

Atleast in the first 2 movies, they never even used it for some of the reasons they intended to use it for, and therefor it becomes even more of a waste, a cause for a reason that went nowhere. They both intended to have a battle inside of it (Toad vs. Nightcrawler) and they also atleast so far, haven't done a whole lot explaining the (movie created) revelation that Magneto helped Xavier build it. Maybe in X3 they'll do the second thing but obviously without Nightcrawler or Toad not the first.

I just don't think anyone can say anyone would have had a problem with an understated, incospicuous comic-book-based representation of Cerebro.
 
It just gets repetative when PrefessorX gets kidnapped all the time. He could actually stop all the evil mutants if he wanted but that is the point why he is kept away from the action. its a bit annoying and no doubt he will go missing again. So what is if for then Cerebo...
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
200,578
Messages
21,766,189
Members
45,602
Latest member
Francuz231
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"