Roose Bolton
Son of Katas
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2011
- Messages
- 19,511
- Reaction score
- 3,799
- Points
- 103
What would Paul add to that?
"More shots of Stewart's ****!"
What would Paul add to that?
"More shots of Stewart's ****!"
Yay 2 guys ridiculously past their prime, yet still great, making a sequel to an awesome movie
Give more credit to his taste in women, will ya? If anything, he'd be gushing over Anna Kendrick.![]()
Yeah, good point, like when they had them referring in a nonsensical way to the Camel gag from the first movie. It just sounded like they were making a movie there, and knew it, instead of it actually being Conan riding into town. Good jokes are fine, but they shouldn't take us out of the movie with silly winks to the camera.
I'm also a big supporter of the Momoa Conan. As exciting as it is that Arnold is returning to the role to some people, to me it seems like backsliding iff you ask me. We get a Conan more in the mold of REH's Conan and now it's back to the other version.
I don't have a problem with Momoa as Conan, but count me in the group that wanted something wayyyyyy different in Destroyer than we got.
And I'll clarify by saying that the throne scene at the end of the original CoB could have gone some fantastic places if DeLaur didn't basically piss all over the franchise with Destroyer.
It would be great closure for me and others who are more fans of the cinematic version than REH's (with all due respect) to see this film potentially done the right way.
It would be great closure for me and others who are more fans of the cinematic version than REH's (with all due respect) to see this film potentially done the right way.
Momoa is essentially the Timothy Dalton of the Conan frnachise; extremely accurate to the source material yet stuck with a film that isn't worthy of his portrayal.