Spider-Fan930 said:Finally come around to my side I see.
Miranda Fox said:Um, dude? I wasn't bashing them because of that - I was bashing them because the members of that community ARE idiots.![]()
hunter rider said:Heh,unlike many on here I'll happily admit when I'm proven wrong![]()
Lightning Strikez! said:Agreed. Trailers can be decieving, but they also give a glimpse as to what to expect as well. And that's what the real issue is here...people were expecting a lame trailer based on their opinion of the first film. Now that a teaser that harkens to the aesthetic quality of the Spider-Man films has been delivered--and by "his Hackness" Tim Story at that----some appear to be grasping for gripes.
It's predictable behavior.
Carp Man said:Hunter wrong ?The world is comming to an end.
![]()
Ive only seen the blurred copy but the feeling i got was of a cinematic movie as opposed to the TV movie feel of the first and the blurred action sequence alone smoked every piece of dull cut and paste action from the first IMOWillie Lumpkin said:One interesting thing about this trailer is that, in my opinion, that minute and a half is probably better than any single minute and a half in the whole first movie.
Does that mean that the movie is better than the first? No, but it does show that this movie has at least a minute and half of material that is better than anything in the first movie and that's something.
Willie Lumpkin said:One interesting thing about this trailer is that, in my opinion, that minute and a half is probably better than any single minute and a half in the whole first movie.
Does that mean that the movie is better than the first? No, but it does show that this movie has at least a minute and half of material that is better than anything in the first movie and that's something.
dyegoh said:Sounds good. Is there any way I can see that teaser? Please send me a private message if so, I'd really appreciate it
D!
hunter rider said:Ive only seen the blurred copy but the feeling i got was of a cinematic movie as opposed to the TV movie feel of the first and the blurred action sequence alone smoked every piece of dull cut and paste action from the first IMO
Carp Man said:Merry Christmas.t:
That would be awsome because Spidey 3 is diffenately being seen by me.kamaldhamal2007 said:GREAT news!!!
NATM did $42+ million in 4 days means a lot of people have seen F4:ROTSS trailer which means a lot of people know next summer there will be a sequel to F4 unlike the first movie's teaser that was attached to a flop elektra.
As long as F4:ROTSS trailers are attached with hit movies at boxoffice i will be happy as more people will know about it.
I hope FOX attaches one final trailer with spider-man 3.
I SEE SPIDEY said:That would be awsome because Spidey 3 is diffenately being seen by me.
On another note, I never understood why Sony put the SM3 teaser with SR and not Pirates. I mean you would think they'd want as many people to see it as possible.
kamaldhamal2007 said:hahahahaha i find it so funny that AICN hasn't posted anything yet.
I know they all are probably scheming up and deciding to come up with something bad to say to F4:ROTSS trailer.
I know this movie will rock june 2007 in North America and the rest of world in June, July, august and september.