Batman R.I.P.

Snort. They're not retconning the origin. Isn't it obvious that the stuff with the Waynes is a ploy to screw with Bruce's head?

Also, and Morrison isn't "gone." He's coming back immediately following the O'Neil/Gaiman stuff.
 
Last edited:
Snort. They're not retconning the origin. Isn't it obvious that the stuff with the Waynes is a ploy to screw with Bruce's head?

Also, and Morrison isn't "gone." He's coming back immediately following the O'Neil/Gaiman stuff.

After the Gaiman stuff are we going straight into Battle for the Cowl?
 
So when is the next RIP suppose to come?
 
I thought the was the point of all this? That we're getting both new Superman and Batman origins? I know Superman for sure, but I thought I read Batman as well.
 
ew are we really?

Yeah, and I'm sure it's just going to be a new drawing of Krypton and what he did between between discovering his powers and ending up at the Planet.


What do you think a new Batman origin would be? There hasn't been one since Year One right? That's twenties years pretty surprising that they haven't touched it yet. If they do it, like Superman, it will just once again be a new version of his journey from his parents' death to him becoming Batman. Since some elements of the movies are starting to creep their way into the comics do you they'd get Ra's somehow involved in a new origin?
 
It is probably going to be "ALFRED IS BRUCE WAYNES FATHER OOOOooOooOoo" "HUSH IS REALLY BRUCE WAYNES BROTHER OooOoooo"
 
If ALfred was Bruce's father what would change? Bruce's feelings towards Thomas and Alfred wouldn't be different or his relationships they wouldn't be different either..
 
This is what really saddens me about comic book writers these days, they equate massive shocks to good storytelling. grant morrison is a good writer, a great writer, but he is so obsessed with being remembered that he is wasting his talents trying to create the next big thing. What I'd prefer to see is more comics like Matt Wagner's Faces, a self contained story that didn't change or screw with any of the mythology, yet was a deep and classic Batman tale. Seriously DC, fill in the gaps, get some good graphic novels published featuring the Penguin, make someone write the definitive Mr Freeze story, doa series like Gotham Central but in the eyes of ordinary citizens. Because the way I see it, this RIP business is nothing but money grabbing rubbish that is essentially a poorer version of Knightfall.
 
yeah, they should stall this best selling monthly series to focus on hard hitting graphic novels about a penguin man and a man w/ a freeze gun. also, why not do a story told through the eyes of gotham citizens, that would be completely original, not gimmicky at all!:whatever:
gimme a break.
 
What I'd prefer to see is more comics like Matt Wagner's Faces, a self contained story that didn't change or screw with any of the mythology...

That I can completely agree with. Those kinds of stories are the backbone of a comic series such as this. If every single story arc is designed to upset the status quo, then there is no status quo (so to speak anyway), and then you have no real story. I'm not saying things should never change, just gradually with a decent amount of thought behind it. I've been enjoying Morrison's run, its sometimes a bit too wacky for my bat-tastes to tell the truth, but I have enjoyed it. However, elements like Talia and Damian, and the Black Glove, while they are intentionally shrouded in mystery, they also feel atrociously underdeveloped/unresolved.

Maybe that's unfair though. The way Morrison goes about things, who knows how much, or rather how little, of the puzzle we actually have. The way the Talia and Damian storyline sits now though, IMO, feels way too unresolved. Are we ever going to get back to them? Its of course too early to tell with RIP, but I get the feeling that when all is said and done we're not gonna get enough information in regards to Hurt, the Black Glove, etc, to actually give a crap about them and it'll all feel way too mechanical, like we read the -ideas- of a story, and not the story itself.
 
I've never understood the complaints about writers who try to shake things up. Fiction is about progression. Comic books sometimes forget that by virtue of their ongoing format, and because actually doing something in a comic book is dangerous. Fans tend lose their minds when things actually happen.

Everybody asks for good stories, and the truth is that a good story is one that moves the story forward. Sometimes it's in little steps, and that's fine--but you need big steps from time to time, too. If Morrison is the guy who finally has the balls to take a big step, that's not a fault. It's whether the execution fails or succeeds that makes that determination. Since this is Morrison, we won't know till it comes together in the final issues. That said, I've never known Morrison to fail.
 
Originally posted by Two-Face=Badass

This is what really saddens me about comic book writers these days, they equate massive shocks to good storytelling. grant morrison is a good writer, a great writer, but he is so obsessed with being remembered that he is wasting his talents trying to create the next big thing. What I'd prefer to see is more comics like Matt Wagner's Faces, a self contained story that didn't change or screw with any of the mythology, yet was a deep and classic Batman tale. Seriously DC, fill in the gaps, get some good graphic novels published featuring the Penguin, make someone write the definitive Mr Freeze story, doa series like Gotham Central but in the eyes of ordinary citizens. Because the way I see it, this RIP business is nothing but money grabbing rubbish that is essentially a poorer version of Knightfall.

Dude, i've been dying for someone to reinvent mr. freeze and write a definitive story with him. I love mr. freeze! Its surprising that in batman's 70 year comic history there's not one memorable Freeze story.
 
I've never understood the complaints about writers who try to shake things up. Fiction is about progression.....Since this is Morrison, we won't know till it comes together in the final issues.

My problem isn't so much writers shaking things up, but things being shaken so often that it feels like a title never really gets a chance to regain its footing*; Infinite Crisis, One Year Later, Jason Todd crap, Batman and Son, Ras, RIP, Final Crisis, etc...It sort of feels like there's a core substance missing and its been replaced with event after event after event told in a manner that seems to aspire to "epic", but actually feels more like it shortchanges the drama. It makes me long for the days when guys like Grant, Wolfman, Moench, and Starlin could seemingly go on for years telling (usually) good stories that advanced the overall legend but weren't presented as "the next big shakeup" or whathaveyou. Though actually, the speculator market of the early 90s is probably to blame for that particular element. Publishers still need everything to have an aura of "superhuge"...I'm just rambling on about the obvious, and getting off the point. :woot:

In Morrison's case, it -is- completely true that we won't be able to offer a fair evaluation of his run until its completely over. I think some of us need to stop worrying about where we think he's taking the story and just see what happens, then decide if it was crap or not. I still have my fears, but I freely admit that I've been enjoying it and in no way consider it crap (though bits and pieces have left me desiring more, and not in the good way).

*I know that seems to be part of Morrison's plan for Batman himself, but I don't know yet if its been good for the book or not, IMO, if that makes sense.
 
My problem isn't so much writers shaking things up, but things being shaken so often that it feels like a title never really gets a chance to regain its footing*; Infinite Crisis, One Year Later, Jason Todd crap, Batman and Son, Ras, RIP, Final Crisis, etc...It sort of feels like there's a core substance missing and its been replaced with event after event after event told in a manner that seems to aspire to "epic", but actually feels more like it shortchanges the drama.
All I can say is that this isn't my experience. The Batman title has had a series of long, solid arcs since 2000 that have managed to keep the story moving in interesting ways without falling prey too events for the sake of events (for the most part). Let's suppose one was only been reading "Batman," and none of the tie-ins or events or whatever else for the past several years.

For starters, Batman has gone mostly untouched by the major events of the DCU. Infinite Crisis didn't touch the title, except for a cursory mention in the Jason Todd-centric annual and the last page before the OYL jump. OYL itself wasn't an event in the least in the title; it simply marked the return of Jim Gordon, and business went on as usual. Final Crisis has had no effect on the book.

Now, within the title, what have we had? We had the post-NML era, which was straightforward enough and ended with the Murderer/Fugitive event, which was well conceived and well executed. No problems there. Then we had Hush, Broken City, and As the Crow Flies, which were all standard Batman stories, also. Hush, despite being considered and event, was really just a tour of the Bat-universe that introduced a new villain. No shakeups here at all. After that we had War Games, which, admittedly, was an event for the sake of having an event, and was a misstep. Then he had Winnick's run, which was an excellent, straightforward, long run that included Jason as a recurring theme. Jason's return was new, but it was hardly a shakeup and certainly wasn't an event. It also happened to be excellent (and Winnick is the only one to have handled Jason properly). After that, OYL started with Face the Face. Simple enough.

Now we come to Morrison, and here's where I become confused: why are people characterizing Morrison's run as being one shakeup after another? Batman and Son wasn't a shakeup; it was a short, simple story where Batman finds out he has a son. Not an event, not earth shattering--and it certainly wasn't treated as such by DC or Morrison. Then what? A Joker prose issue? The Club of Heroes? A Damien flash-forward issue? Three fake Batmen? Hardly earth-shattering stuff. The Resurrection of Ra's Al Ghul, like War Games, seemed mostly an event for the sake of having an event, but that's on the heads of the editors, not Morrison.

Morrison's run, up until RIP, has not bee shakeup or event oriented. It's just been Morrison telling some (odd) Batman stories with some RIP hints sprinkled in. RIP itself, at present, doesn't seem complaint-worthy either. It's not pulled out of nowhere, it's not poorly executed (so far), and if it results in significant change, then it's not unnecessary.

As far as I can tell, the only reason to complain about the type of stories being told in Batman is if you don't like long-form comics. That's why Detective exists: for those who prefer short-form comics. I happen to enjoy both runs, and I think the best approach is to read both: Detective is the backbone of the Batman universe, and Batman is the progression. You don't have a completely satisfying experience without both.

Anyways, if I have a choice between the Batman approach, which has been one important story after another, and post OMD Spider-Man approach, which has been issue after issue of irrelevant, unimportant filler, I'll choose Batman any day of the week. Spider-Man is the epitome of the "status quo" argument, and it has effectively become a broken comic. It presents the philosophy that nothing that happens to Spider-Man will ever matter, because he'll always be hard-luck Parker who has irrelevant adventures and irrelevant relationships--and just in case something goes wrong and the character actually grows, we've got Joe Quesada to come along and send Spider-Man back to the seventies in his Stagnation Time Machine.

Stories need to go places and they need to end, or they will never be satisfactory. Whether it's time for a big shift in Batman is, I suppose, up to you. Am I ready for Dick Grayson to be Batman? I think I may be.
 
Last edited:
I just hope Morrison can change my mind when he finishes this arc. I sense that this is going to be have a great ending, that i'm going to love. But i don't want to over-hype it, because i may be disappointed. But think about it: Because of this, we get a 2 part Denny O'Neil Batman story and what should be a GREAT 2 part Neil Gaiman story. So even if Morrison's run ends in disappointment, we still get these stories that are going to be great anyway. That, and Dini's "Heart of Hush", which is freakin' amazing.

and i have to admit, the Battle for The Cowl sounds interesting.
 
Ok. Everyone is entitlted to thier opinion but I really don't understand this story line or why people like it, In fairness to Morrison, I've barely been following it because I think the whole idea from what I have read is ******ed.
Back in the nineties, they broke Bruce Wayne. They had Azreal fill in as Batman. Then Bruce came back and reclaimed the mantle. Then he went on vacation (which was dumb in my idea) and gave the opening for Nightwing to be the next Batman. Both tried, both failed. Why? Because Bruce Wayne is Batman.
Just because Marvel is coming up with some story that no one will care about after Steve Rogers come back doesn't mean DC has to do the same..... Captain America surrenders to the government = awesome ending of Civil war. Cap being killed by some chick = shock and awe with no good story. Then they cop out and say she was mind controlled???? Hmmmm..... maybe they can make them both aliens so it never happened. Oh wait, that's Secret Invasion. If not it will be redone at some point so Steve Rogers is Cap again.
So now I ask why Batman? Could you make him kill people? Yeah, but why not read the Punisher or Wolverine? Why not have Dick Grayson take up the mantle? DC has spent years on developping Nightwing and why give up a good potential for the character? Why not make him young and hip and have Tim take up the mantle? Please pardon my language but it's because BRUCE WAYNE IS THE ****ING BATMAN!!!!! This whole thing is ridiculous. It will last 6 months to 2 years before it is disregarded so why waiste everyone's time. Write a decent story about Batman. It shouldn't be that difficult, for 80 years people have been doing it with one sole person as Batman, the one and Only Batman..... Bruce Wayne
 
Just because Marvel is coming up with some story that no one will care about after Steve Rogers come back doesn't mean DC has to do the same..... Captain America surrenders to the government = awesome ending of Civil war. Cap being killed by some chick = shock and awe with no good story. Then they cop out and say she was mind controlled????

It wasn't a "cop out." It was obvious the moment it happened that Agent 13 (not just "some chick") was being mind controlled; Dr. Faustus had been manipulating her for some time before the death of Steve. More importantly, it was hardly a "shock and awe" ending. Perhaps you should actually read the book before you complain, eh? Ed Brubaker's Captain America has been one of the best books on the shelf since issue #1, and the death of Rogers and his replacement by Bucky hasn't changed that. The book is shinning example of how to replace a hero properly, and it has succeeded admirably.
 
All I can say is that this isn't my experience. The Batman title has had a series of long, solid arcs since 2000 that have managed to keep the story moving in interesting ways without falling prey too events for the sake of events (for the most part). Let's suppose one was only been reading "Batman," and none of the tie-ins or events or whatever else for the past several years......Stories need to go places and they need to end, or they will never be satisfactory. Whether it's time for a big shift in Batman is, I suppose, up to you. Am I ready for Dick Grayson to be Batman? I think I may be.

I edited that for space, no offense.

I do think of Jason's return as something of a shakeup. He'd been one of the few characters in comics to actually -stay- deceased, and I'm not sure if his return has really amounted to much. This aspect of the books doesn't really have anything to do with Morrison anyway, so why am I rambling? Grumble grumble.

Batman and Son was definitely a shake up as it brought a story that was of dubious canonicity to begin with into the mainstream books, or at least elements of it. IMO, the inclusion of Damian was certainly a giant surprise.

Some of the "problems" people have with Morrison's run also has to do with some of the smaller details, like "Joe Chill in Hell" and the confusion that sprung up from that (though that could be more Tony Daniel's fault), and the idea that basically all of Batman's publication history is in some form or another valid and it all happened in the last 15 years, which on one hand leads to awesome ideas, and on the other hand seems wacky.

As far as "status quo" goes, I mean that in the sense of building up a cast of players and letting the situations happen in a natural manner, not so much in the sense of keeping everything the same as it ever was. Face the Face is, IMO, a good example of reverting back to the old status quo instead of setting up a new one. I know a lot of people liked Harvey scarring himself, but I was ready for something new with the character. With Morrison's run I just kinda think that -certain- aspects feel a bit artificial or forced, though that may be due to the fact that they simply aren't resolved yet.

You're spot on about long form comic stories. When Morrison says that he's been telling one long story from the get go he isn't lying, and hopefully some of my concerns (Talia and Damian, The Black Glove) will be addressed when this all wraps up, whenever the heck it actually does. There are things, however, that still probably won't end up being developed into anything more, like Jezebel Jet, who to me still feels like a piece of mechanics with some ideas and details stuck to her and not a real character.

As for how all of this -will- end up.... Crap isn't that just part of the fun!?!? Dick as Batman though, eh, not again, and he doesn't even want it anyway, does he? I'd rather see Tim take it up. Of course he's too young, but that'd be part of the fun, and I don't mean fun in a Spider-Man wisecrack-punch-wisecrack sense. Tim as The Batman with a Damian Robin, I'd read that. I wouldn't expect it to last, since I don't expect DC to actually let Morrison keep Bruce out of the picture forever.

Speaking of Bruce being out of the picture. We apparently know that he doesn't die, so what happens? My wacky guess is rehab to combat the heroin and meth addiction gifted to him by Dr. Hurt, even though that hasn't even really been touched on since it happened and there might not even -be- any addiction as far as we know. Did the emergence of the Batman of Zur-En-Arrh backup persona effectively wipe out the possibility of Bruce becoming an addict? That's the impression I got from the end of 678, but who knows how this could turn.
 
Well I'm a bit new the boards here, so I'll try to state my opinion on this whole arc with as much civility as possible.

I can say that in my experience, whenever this comes up, someone inevitably asks me what happens, and all I can say is, "well...so far Bruce Wayne has been dosed with weaponized meth and heroin, and then he was dumped on the streets, where he talks to a Bat-Mite that probably isn't there, and beats the holy hell out of people in a multi-colored, pieced together Batsuit. The guy out to get him may or may not be Thomas Wayne, and Alfred may or may not be Bruce's real father." Needless to say, once all of that is out in the open, most people just say, "Eh..I sure did like The Dark Knight," and the discussion moves on.

I find the stunt to be a bit ridiculous, and terribly confusing. I thought that the point of all of this Crisis stuff, as far as Batman is concerned, was to move alot of the silly Silver Age stuff out of continuity...and it gets awfully confusing when Grant Morrison keeps on bringing it back into continuity, and then you've got to go on the damn internet and track down all of the obscure Batman titles. (I'm sure that someone else has already lamented that fact in this thread, but that doesn't make it any less of an issue.)

I thought that bringing Damian in as Batman's son was stupid from the moment I heard it was going to happen. I enjoy Son of the Demon as an Elseworlds story, but I really don't see why Batman even needs to have a son from a story perspective, considering the fact that he has Tim and Dick. But hey...it's Grant Morrison..and he gets to do whatever he wants, apparently.

I felt that the Joker Prose story was garbage, and I find it terribly confusing when The Joker only shows up in that form when Grant Morrison is writing him, but then when Dini writes him, all of this super psycho garbage is nowhere to be found, and he's not dressed like Marilyn Manson.

I can appreciate the fact that Morrison has got this all planned out, and I bet that it will work wonderfully as a Batman story when it's all said and done, but it is just crazy to present it to audiences as a monthly title. Especially when Batman is back in the public light again...but hey...who cares about new readers anyway?

I really just find myself waiting for this whole RIP thing to go ahead and end already...and it pains me to know that it's going to be stretched out all the way to the end of the Final Crisis. However, I don't see Bruce Wayne dying..and I'll probably regret typing that in a few days...but I really do think that when this is over, it's just going to end up making Batman look all the more unbeatable and badass. I mean, he has a backup personality for crying out loud....that's pretty cool, I must admit.

I think that most of my disappointment in Morrison's run stems from the fact that I know the man can write Batman well, just from the handful of his Justice League stories that I've written. I remember a Batman that single handedly took out three or four white martians aboard their own spacecraft...and I really wish that I was getting that Batman month to month.

But hey, everyone pretty much knows that even if they do bite the bullet and kill off Bruce Wayne, he'll be back inside of a year....because a Batman without Bruce Wayne is not going to sell...even if you put Dick Grayson under the cowl, it's still going to be Nightwing dressed up as Batman.
 
I do think of Jason's return as something of a shakeup. He'd been one of the few characters in comics to actually -stay- deceased, and I'm not sure if his return has really amounted to much.
It amounted to a great deal until Winnick left and everybody else started ruining the character.

Batman and Son was definitely a shake up as it brought a story that was of dubious canonicity to begin with into the mainstream books, or at least elements of it. IMO, the inclusion of Damian was certainly a giant surprise.
"Surprising" and "shakeup" are not the same. The status quo was not changed. All that happened was new element was introduced and then whisked away, to be used later.

Some of the "problems" people have with Morrison's run also has to do with some of the smaller details, like "Joe Chill in Hell" and the confusion that sprung up from that (though that could be more Tony Daniel's fault),
What was confusing?

and the idea that basically all of Batman's publication history is in some form or another valid and it all happened in the last 15 years, which on one hand leads to awesome ideas, and on the other hand seems wacky.
I This is not related to my comments, which were abou the attitude that Morrison's run has been all "shakeups."

As far as "status quo" goes, I mean that in the sense of building up a cast of players and letting the situations happen in a natural manner, not so much in the sense of keeping everything the same as it ever was.
And this has not been happening in Morrison's run, in your opinion? I am inclined to disagree.

Face the Face is, IMO, a good example of reverting back to the old status quo instead of setting up a new one. I know a lot of people liked Harvey scarring himself, but I was ready for something new with the character.
My real problem with it was that the reasons for Harvey's relapse were idiotic. Very, very disappointing story. Even more disappointing was that nobody even bothered the use Harvey between Hush and Face The Face--and entire avenue of storytelling was just ignored. Frustrating.

As for how all of this -will- end up.... Crap isn't that just part of the fun!?!? Dick as Batman though, eh, not again, and he doesn't even want it anyway, does he?
As I've said in the past, if no one else was going to be Batman, I believe Dick would do it in a heartbeat--no mater how much he hates it. Moreover, if the person another person put on the costume and did not meet Dick's standards, he'd take it from him. The only thing Dick would hate worse than being Batman is watching the mantle die or be perverted.

I'd rather see Tim take it up. Of course he's too young, but that'd be part of the fun, and I don't mean fun in a Spider-Man wisecrack-punch-wisecrack sense. Tim as The Batman with a Damian Robin, I'd read that. I wouldn't expect it to last, since I don't expect DC to actually let Morrison keep Bruce out of the picture forever.
I think this needs to be for keeps. This has been billed as the final Batman story, and it needs to be for real if that's the goal. It may be that the story isn't really about replacing Batman--that the replacement is only to serve a larger goal when he returns. That would be fine, but that's not the impression I'm getting. If you say you're ending the Bruce Wayne story, do it--and don't do it with a plan to undo it in two years.

This is the sort of story that can make or break the potential the future of the book. If Dick's time as Batman (or whoever puts on the cowl) is just a stunt, then it will forever sour the chances of anyone ever succeeding Bruce Wayne. I want to see Bruce Wayne succeeded one day, regardless of the fact that he's my favourite character and could never be surpassed. That is simply where the story should go, and I want stories to move. I want them to end, too. Bruce deserves and ending someday--not an endless repetitive cycle battling the Joker, Penguin, and Two-Face.

They've painted themselves into a corner by saying (repeatedly) that this is the real deal; the end of Bruce's story. Now they have to deliver. If it turns out to be temporary, people will feel cheated. I will feel cheated, even though the idea of Bruce Wayne never being Batman again is scary. If it is temporary, they had better make it mean something, make it important somehow, lest it become the Clone Saga.

Speaking of Bruce being out of the picture. We apparently know that he doesn't die, so what happens? My wacky guess is rehab to combat the heroin and meth addiction gifted to him by Dr. Hurt, even though that hasn't even really been touched on since it happened and there might not even -be- any addiction as far as we know. Did the emergence of the Batman of Zur-En-Arrh backup persona effectively wipe out the possibility of Bruce becoming an addict? That's the impression I got from the end of 678, but who knows how this could turn.
I think that something so traumatizing happens that Bruce can't bear to be Batman any longer. Maybe he kills someone. In any case, I think he's retired and left Gotham to try and put himself back together as human being, not as Batman. He's gone to live as a hermit, or perhaps at Nanda Parbat. I think an interesting situation would be for Dick to be Batman for a couple of years (comic time) before Bruce returns to Gotham. Use the time to age him, grey his hair a little, to hammer home the point that he's not going to be--and not interested in being--Batman any longer. Make him a supporting player, as in Batman Beyond.

I think the reason he's "gone" in the RIP tie ins is that DC knows they could never establish a new Batman so long as Bruce is still in the book--the stories would always gravitate towards him, Batman or not. If they keep him out for a couple of years, they can take that time to establish Grayson without having the kill Bruce and his future potential. They bring him back as a supporting player, and by this time all but the most stubborn fans have accepted Dick.

Another interesting question: could their be two Batmen? We've got plenty of Green Lanterns, two Wildcats, and if Geoff Johns' comments are any indication, he intends to have three co-existing Flashes when Flash: Rebirth is done. I'm inclined to think there can only be one Batman, but I will admit the idea of Bruce returning in the future and having both Dick and Bruce as Batman is intriguing.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,359
Messages
22,091,265
Members
45,886
Latest member
Elchido
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"