Leon the Professional said:
I agree with a lot of what you say, except that I don't think that the Batman persona is just a mask like the playboy persona.
I like your s/n.
The Batman persona is like the dark depths of the real Bruce Wayne. He's not just putting on a mask and acting. As Batman, he is letting out that dark side of him that developed since the death of his parents. Batman is a true part of himself.
I wish
The Guard were here. He has more patience with this sort of thing than I do. Okay. You say that as Batman, he's "not just putting on a mask and acting." Except that he is. Oh, you're right that it's the dark depths of the real Bruce Wayne. That all of that stuff is in him, and Batman is the way he expresses it. But actors usually will tell you that the only way they can perform convincingly is to pull the approriate emotions out of themselves, by dredging up powerful memories that evoke specific emotions. What Bruce is doing as Batman is letting out something that is inside himself, something that is very very real. Which is to say that his performance as Batman is 100% genuine because Batman is a part of him.
His Batman VOICE is somewhat of an act, since it's not his natural voice, but let's not confuse Batman the character with a simple voice or a costume. Batman is more than those things, and when Bruce is out being Batman, he is out being himself.
No, he's out being Batman.
Just because he acts very different around Alfred versus around a criminal doesn't mean he must be putting on an act when he's facing a criminal. It is normal to act different toward friend and enemy.
Yes, but look at the gentle way Batman treats the child in Begins. The way Batman acts toward a child is different from the way that private Bruce would act toward a child. Bruce would probably talk more. Batman doesn't say much but he doesn't have to; his costume is based on the notion that "criminals are a superstitious and cowardly lot," the idea that their own human conscience evokes a feeling of guilt that makes them expect their bad deeds to catch up with them and take them to hell. If they believe that Batman is the personification of that, then the costume and the voice and such are doing their job. But a child has nothing to fear from Batman, and so what he sees is a hero.
When Bruce is with Alfred, he's just being himself. He doesn't have to pretend with Alfred. On the other hand, wearing a cape and a mask and talking like Clint Eastwood is a giant game of pretend.
Private Bruce smiles. Batman does not, at least not in a nice way. As I said, Batman is an amped-up version of the real Bruce. He's real Bruce, but with the contrast turned up, if that makes any sense.
Basically, I don't think there are 3 personas, i.e. a fake Bruce, a real Bruce, and a fake Batman. I think that there are just 2 personas, i.e. a simple, shallow fake Brue Wayne persona, and a complex, deep real Bruce/Batman persona, which just seems like 2 seperate personas because of its complexity.
That's fair, but by that logic one can take it further and say that there is only really one persona which is so complex it appears to be three; that is to say that even Public Bruce is a part of who Bruce Wayne truly is; because he is Thomas Wayne's son, he is rich, he need not work, he likes the ladies, he lives in a big house and he wants to help those less fortunate. That is all true of Bruce Wayne. If anything, Public Bruce is a distorted projection of one side of the true Bruce Wayne, and Batman is a distorted projection of the other side of the true Bruce Wayne.
One complex person. Three faces.