Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]335598[/split]
I think its hilariously dumb....might see it twice lol
Not helping...
“I can tell you that everyone is surprised at how well that Baywatch plays and has tested,” the guy says. “It went through development for years and years, but somehow the tone came out right and it apparently channels The Rock’s sweet spot. [Allegedly] the best comedic use of Johnson to date. There’s a satirical current that sends up Jerry Bruckheimer and Michael Bay cinema, mocking the omnipresent shallowness and overt calculation of every set piece, plot point and storyboarded CGI action sequence. Baywatch wasn’t super-expensive, save for its stars, and will surprise audiences as a smart, funny film that works like gangbusters.”
So the people who made it are shocked it's testing well?
Where does it say in the post that the people who are surprised that it's testing well are the same people who made it? I mean surely "everyone" includes those people, but if you interpreted that as just those people, you clearly read something that wasn't there.
Cause I follow Hollywood-Elsewhere and his sources for stuff is usually someone close to production or studio/agents(that's how he gets scripts so early). If it's still in testing phase, it leans more towards studio people talking rather than critics or general audiences.
GQ mexico: