Lex Luthor
Evildoer
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2006
- Messages
- 9,537
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
I would have posted sooner, but I was in the restroom throwing up after reading this.
Yeah, and our luck, they'll get Singer and Co. to do it.Motown Marvel said:dude, we need to raise hell like we did when AICN did that sueprman script review years back. WB got the message. that needs to happen again.
AgentPat said:Yeah, and our luck, they'll get Singer and Co. to do it.![]()
![]()
I guess the Brothers Warner haven't seen My Super Ex GF.
Drakon said:My friend and I were talking and we agree-this would work off great as an epic trilogy in the vein of Star Wars. Start it with Hal, then Kyle, and finally John.
You could start it off as a war film, have him get the ring, and show him learning from Sinestro in a simular manner of exposition that Spidey learned how to do his thing.
As does the screenwriter.Substance D said:that reviewer needs to learn how to write.
ShadowBoxing said:What potential? Potential to be Abso-F***ing-Lutely Re-F***ing-Tarded.
The Watchman said:Sadly I think Singer would have been more suited to a GL movie than Superman.
I like this proposal a lot.Motown Marvel said:dude, ridley scott for GL......(tony scott for GA).
Octoberist said:I was so angry when I read this review.
Why in the Hell would WB ok this script? I'm sure they won't but why waste any time with this writer? Is it because of the production company behind it?
WB is asking for trouble. You take something that has so much potential, and you make it into a slap-stick comedy? The hell is that all about? It's Catwoman and Batman & Robin all over again.
WB, you got Batman Begins. You got it right. Superman, though flawed, still has enough kicks in it to kick ass. But damn..