The Amazing Spider-Man Bendis Breaks His Silence On The Spider-Man Reboot!

saiyanaida

Civilian
Joined
Apr 4, 2009
Messages
175
Reaction score
0
Points
11
Brian Micheal Bendis, the creator and writer of Ultimate Spiderman said this to IGN


IGN Comics: I wanted to ask you a completely unrelated question. You tweeted a week or two ago that you went to Sony because of the Spider-Man films. I remember a while back we had discussed how you had been pulled in to watch the first Spider-Man film with Stan Lee. I know you can't say much here but is your involvement with this relaunch more significant than screening bits of the movie?

Bendis: I honestly don't know what I'm allowed to say. So I'm going to pass for now. It was quite the morning and afternoon – quite the long meeting – and quite amazing. I'll let you know when I can say what it was. But I left the day happy. And that's kind of what people want to hear from me anyhow. Was it good news or bad news? It was good news. Everything I've heard since that meeting sounded like good news – in theory.

IGN Comics: Awesome. Well when you do find out what you can say and when, please shoot me an e-mail or give me a ring.

Bendis: Absolutely. I'm not trying to be tight-lipped or coy, but I don't know what's appropriate to the other creative people involved. It's their story to tell and I don't want to be running around saying, "Well I saw it! I saw it first!" Two seconds ago we were talking about ********s who spoil the endings of books – I don't want to spoil things about a movie that hasn't even been shot yet. –laughs-

IGN Comics: I hear you. More generally, not speaking to your involvement, it's my understanding this is going back to Pete in high school, back to a more youthful age. What would you consider key guidelines to that sort of approach?

Bendis: I think you should do a line-for-line, exact adaptation of my work. -laughs- No, no, honestly I always say, you know, if you look at Ultimate Spider-Man, that's what I think. Why would I create something other than what I thought should be out there. And being asked to Sony was immensely flattering. It did make me feel that, every year since I've broken into comic books, a little more of the wall between mainstream Hollywood and comics is being broken down. I appreciate that. Because there was a huge wall up, and now there's not even a question that they call someone who might know something. And it's not just me, it's my other peers. And every time I hear that, I always think that's good thinking. You know what I mean? I'm not meaning to sound arrogant, like, "Yes! Of course you should call me!" but for this Spider-Man or for Geoff's stuff, it just seems like it's smart. So I'm thrilled to be a part of that aspect of it.


http://comics.ign.com/articles/107/1073387p3.html
 
Could have been posted in the Bendis thread...
 
Today's a good day for Ultimate Spiderman fans like myself
 
I. Could. Not. Be. Happier.
 
Marc Webb can't speak. James Vanderbilt can't speak. The potential actors can't speak. Bendis can't speak. Does Sony own these people? :(
 
I think they want to tell us on their time to try and build hype.
 
Man, i gotta know. Im a huge fan of mainstream and Ultimate spider-man, but since they're concentrating on pete in highschool in the 21st Century Bendis is the man to talk to. Its definitely up there with one of my favorite books even though the ultimate universe was in a bit of a lull for about 1.5 - 2 years.

Its just good to hear sony is talking to someone who actually knows something about Peter Parker. As much as i used to enjoy Spiderman 1 and 2, I just cant help but see how backwards they got his whole world.

Spider-man is supposed to be cocky and confident in his suit, cracking jokes, all the while hes in the pretty dark world of crime and murder ((im simplifying it greatly, I just wrote my whole opinion WAY too many times and i cant bring myself to type it out right now, got a damn paper to do =/ )). Yet in the movies he was a mopey depressed guy in a bright comical city. Just completely ass-backwards

ANYWAY, glad to see theyre talkin to a knowledgeable man.
 
Totally agree. If anyone does Peter's personality perfectly it would be Bendis.
 
Bendis broke his silence to tell us nothing....lame.
 
I'm really hoping they keep Bendis 10 feet away from making a villain :csad:
 
Hmm...but isn't the villain(s) already decided, long before they brought Bendis in...or so one would think or hope?
 
I'm thinking they need him for the dialogue and character development.
 
Marc Webb is a fan of spider-man and from what I understand, he has a more updated and varied grasp of the character more than Raimi did. Plus, I think Webb can interpret and handle the vast source material better with or without Bendis. It does also help that Webb is a fan of USM and I think we may indeed get something incredible. If Raimi could have gotten a more accurate portrayal of the characters, the films wouldn't have been as bad. Here's hoping we get accurate portrayals.
 
Totally agree. If anyone does Peter's personality perfectly it would be Bendis.

...but he also destroys villains like no others. It's 50/50 for me. I see goodness in the portrayal of Peter. But the villains are as important to me. And if he is pointing fingers and destroying them in the movie too, I'll just hope for Marvel to bring the rights back and make another reboot again.
 
...but he also destroys villains like no others. It's 50/50 for me. I see goodness in the portrayal of Peter. But the villains are as important to me. And if he is pointing fingers and destroying them in the movie too, I'll just hope for Marvel to bring the rights back and make another reboot again.

I agree.

Although his Ultimate Doc Ock was perfect up until the Clone Saga, when he did the whole Magneto thing with him.
 
I thought his Norman was the best yet. Though I can understand wh people hated his Goblin.
 
Just saying, I think this should be merged with the other Bendis thread, to make a general Bendis thread.


And oh yeah... Good news, I guess.
 
DACMAN, who did the animation of Spidey in you Avatar?
...but he also destroys villains like no others. It's 50/50 for me. I see goodness in the portrayal of Peter. But the villains are as important to me. And if he is pointing fingers and destroying them in the movie too, I'll just hope for Marvel to bring the rights back and make another reboot again.
This is always a concern. But this time, I shall not be powerless to stop him. Even though I am.
 
The Goblins
Shocker
Kraven
Scorpion

I don't see why people beat up on his Kraven or Shocker so much. Kraven was what he was in the 616 comics. Go back and read them. The only difference is it shows why Kraven is so popular. In the 616 comics it only says everyone knows who he is and his "hunts" are well known around the world. It never says how. Giving him a reality tv show was a great idea and right in line with the character. It also kept it in theme that he messed around with his genetics. Although I do love the whole jungle potion stuff as well. I love how Spidey smashed him with ease at first. He was after all, just a normal guy.

And the Shocker was always just a guy with high tech equipment. He was never really fleshed out. I thought he worked just fine in the Ultimate comics.

The only one I will give people are the Goblins. He made those too different. Even though I liked them and thought it worked, I can see why others didn't.
 
Last edited:
©KAW;18130730 said:
DACMAN, who did the animation of Spidey in you Avatar?

Henry David Knock

[A] was kind enough to do the avatar though.
 
I don't see why people beat up on his Kraven or Shocker so much. Kraven was what he was in the 616 comics. Go back and read them. The only difference is it shows why Kraven is so popular. In the 616 comics it only says everyone knows who he is and his "hunts" are well known around the world. It never says how. Giving him a reality tv show was a great idea and right in line with the character. It also kept it in theme that he messed around with his genetics. Although I do love the whole jungle potion stuff as well. I love how Spidey smashed him with ease at first. He was after all, just a normal guy.

Kraven in the comics was never made into a joke. The comics showed that even with the serum he used he is a threat to Spider-Man thanks to his traps and skills. Kraven was also not a werewolf. And a reality show is so far from the Kraven character it's not even funny. Kraven was about the hunt. If he was about the popularity he wouldn't have not given a crap that hunting Spider-Man would be illegal and he would have let the world know he bested Spider-Man during his last hunt. He wanted to be the best hunter in the world for himself.

The fact you can even say the characters are close makes me wonder if you even know the character. Kraven shot himself in the ****ing head after he felt he had bested Spider-Man. It makes me find it funny how you complain about the stuff Raimi got wrong character-wise and then turn around and try to argue that Kraven going after Spider-Man for ratings is true to the character. That's as far from Kraven's motivations as you can get. Spectacular Spider-Man kept the stupid animal transformation thing but at least he was still a hunter in spirit on that show. So US wins as the absolute worst Kraven interpretation ever.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"