The Joker's laugh at the very end made up for the lack of laughing throughout the film. I thought they deliberately did it that way so that, in essence, after telling Batman his plan, he would get the "last laugh."
This thread is still alive?!?!?!
the batpod turning on the wall was 100% not from Nolan.
Wow.
Funny. The only person I recall seeing die in that scene is the fake Ra's. Considering the amount of training these guys have had, do you really think they've never been in a tight situation where they've had to get the hell out of Dodge at a moment's notice?
He was also being a smartass to Two-Face even when the guy had a loaded gun in his hand. And called the Joker a "nobody" even after he'd stolen over 60 million from him and his pals. That says more about Maroni's nature than it does about Batman's supposed inability to intimidate.
i am not following you. elaborate on that please.
I thought it was stupid, but not terribly unrealistic. I remember watching that special that was on HBO that talked about the Batpod and it said something about it having a motor for each wheel sitting inside the hub. Moving at the right speed, the front motor could keep the front wheel spinning enough to force it up the wall, but to get the whole 'Pod to turn around on the back wheel like it did would require some phenominal upper body and arm strength. Unless the 'Pod kicked itself off the wall somehow, but I didn't see indication that that was the case.
Its not about realism (because the semi flip was unrealistic too), its about how it looks. And it looked ridiculous.I'm pretty sure batman has enough upper body strengh. I mean, he trains enough. I'm not saying he wouldn't half to try hard, I'm just saying I think he'd be strong enough to do it.
Yes because the Academy will be agitated by that. Come on, they voted Million Dollar Baby the best movie of the year! That overrated piece of crap!Police have to follow rules and precendure where arresting a suspect. One of which, I would imagine, is that if a guy dressed like a Bat kidnaps somebody, infront of witnesses, from his home country. That's illegal and anybody with any knowledge of the law would be able to get a mistrial. And it;s stupid stuff like that that stop this from being a serious Oscar contender.
Its not about realism (because the semi flip was unrealistic too), its about how it looks. And it looked ridiculous.
Of course man! I loved the movie and that part was trivial really.I thought it was looked pretty cool. it mighta been unnescisary, but it was sure cool. (kinda like the joker in the nerses outfit) look, if you don't like it that's fine. just try not to let it bother you enough to take you outa the movie, cuz it's really not that big a deal. ok?
Of course man! I loved the movie and that part was trivial really.
Yes because the Academy will be agitated by that. Come on, they voted Million Dollar Baby the best movie of the year! That overrated piece of crap!
Not really. I would think that the volunteer Batmen would have ran for the hills and not come back after seeing what happened to their leader, Brian Douglass.The only things that were disappointing were the subplots--they were either irrelevant to the movie's point (Reese) or trailed away and forgotten about (volunteer batmen). Other than that, I liked it.
Not really. I would think that the volunteer Batmen would have ran for the hills and not come back after seeing what happened to their leader, Brian Douglass.Since Brian was still dressed in his Batman outfit, he might have attempted to go after Joker himself, but at that point nobody knew what the Joker was truly capable of.
And the whole bit with Reese proved the lengths that Bruce would go to rescue someone, even if they don't have his interests in mind. Reese might also think that revealing Batman's identity will get Joker to stop killing, because at that point, everyone still thinks that Joker only wants to know who Batman is.
To me, the "central dramatic question" of the entire film is, "Will Gotham stop the Joker?" Brian tried and failed. Reese tried and failed too. Both subplots are off-shoots from the conflict with Batman, but they're still relevant to the movie's main plot.
this post made me want to see the movie again.
I think you're the second or third person I've done that to.this post made me want to see the movie again.
Apart from the thoughts anita posted, i would like to add that Reese served as a tool for Nolan to show that the joker was no longer interested in killing Batman. Sure he said so himself, but he also put his words where his mouth is (how does that expression go anyway?) and proved it when batman's identity was about to become public.The only things that were disappointing were the subplots--they were either irrelevant to the movie's point (Reese) or trailed away and forgotten about (volunteer batmen). Other than that, I liked it.
Also, bruce saving his ass was a great insight in Bruce's mentality.