Bone claws!?

That made no sense, mainly coz of spelling...but let's just read it over, corrected:

Bone is one of the strongest metals ever. SO???

WTF
 
^^ Ok, lets end our quarrel and get back to the point-
Bone is one of the strongest metals ever. SO???
 
wolverine_mini_origin_cover_02.jpg

This picture does pose a problem with the movie version of Wolverine though. Based on what we've seen, I'd say that maybe bone claws could fit in the adamantium ones from the movies. However, in the movies the claws come from between the fingers instead of over them and there's barely enough space for them as it is. So if there were bones claws that were bigger than the adamantium ones, they would've mangled Logan's hands whenever he popped them out.

And yet, there's no logical explanation for Logan's ability to pop out the claws without natural means to do so. And there's no unquestionable proof in the movies so far to account that the claws are completely artificial.

Beast's comments are posturing and nothing more. It's a variation of the "I was doing so-and-so since before you were born" line.
As for Stryker's comment about giving Logan his claws, people just forget the context of the conversation and the lines that followed. Stryker was about to be killed by Logan so he played one of the aces up his sleeve: his knowledge of Logan's past. He gave him hints of info before saying the "I just gave you claws" bit and quickly followed by saying he would tell logan everything if he took them away from there. Giving him free info about his true nature would not have been in Stryker's advantage.

I personally like the bones claws but in the end, there's just as many factor to warrant their use as there are to remove them from the equation.
 
IMO...the whole bone claws thing was a stupid idea from the start till now.
They removed his adamantium but they wanted him to retain his claws, so they came up with this garbage.
Let's just clean up the continuity and forget about the bone claws.
Artifical cyberpunk claws as they where for years.
 
When you quote somebody on here...it usually means that you are talking back to them. When you quote someone in real life...it helps to actually reference the speaker because not everyone in here knows every Quinten Terintino quote. But now that you mention it...I remember reading that and see it helps. Not everyone knows or thinks they know exactly what you are thinking.


And here is what I quoted from you when I said that I never wanted movies to be 100% like the comics

Now who is going to take that when you said "you", that you were actually referring to Quenten Terintino???

Oh yeah? I didn't quote Terintino?


Here's a quote from Quentin Tarantino from Wizard Magazine #155 "The reason I'll never do a comic book movie with, like, Flash or something like that is f--- those comic geeks, man. You can't please them. I might do a comic book movie, but I'd come up with my own characters where I'm God, and I'm the expert and not you guys."

To which you replied

Then why are you on here arguing for them???


then I said

Your missing the point. You want movies like the comics. Here's a chance to make it that way and your still not pleased?

And then you yelled at me for taking that at a direct attack. I then replied with "I was rewording what Tarantino said." and you said "how was I supposed to know"
How? Cause I posted it before and you knew about it cause you even replied to the quote!
 
Quenten Terintino
rofl1pq.gif


Sometimes I can't just believe the typos here.

And the bone claws rock, okay?
 
IMO...the whole bone claws thing was a stupid idea from the start till now.
They removed his adamantium but they wanted him to retain his claws, so they came up with this garbage.
Let's just clean up the continuity and forget about the bone claws.
Artifical cyberpunk claws as they where for years.

I have said this forever. They rip out his adamantium but still want Wolverine as a major player and able to still hack and slash...so they write in this crappy bone claw idea. I don't like bone claws and think they are dumb. But there is merit to it. He would have to of had muscles to be able to protract and retract his metal claws...the scientits did not make muscles in his arm to be able to do that. So, he would have to have some sort of mutation that allows him to do that...which is bone claws that he was born with. I just hope they don't show them in the movie...it's still dumb.
 
Oh yeah? I didn't quote Terintino?




To which you replied




then I said



And then you yelled at me for taking that at a direct attack. I then replied with "I was rewording what Tarantino said." and you said "how was I supposed to know"
How? Cause I posted it before and you knew about it cause you even replied to the quote!

WTF!?!?!?!?! You bring this back up after more than 6 months...I don't even remember what we were talking about.
 
I agree with Tarantino. If he did make a comic book movie, no matter how good it may be, the "fanboy elite" here in the forums will still find some imaginary or trivial reasons to cry about it.
 
They rip out his adamantium but still want Wolverine as a major player and able to still hack and slash...
With all his martial arts training and Japan background...
Why the heck didn't they just give him a f*n SWORD for the slashingpart?:ninja:
Can anybody tell me who wrote the comics at that time?
I need a name to blame.:oldrazz:
 
According to some nerds on here, it isn't about whether he would do a good job or not...it's about whether the nerds are pleased with what was put into the movie.

Seriously, comic book movies are movies. Comic books and books.

They are different. If I were him I'd **** the fans and do a comic book movie for myself
 
it isn't about whether he would do a good job or not...it's about whether the nerds are pleased with what was put into the movie.

Seriously, comic book movies are movies. Comic books and books.

They are different.
You got it, pal.:oldrazz:

If you adapt a book or comic or do a remake of an old movie, you have to concern about the original and do the tightropewalk between being true to the original and or own cinematic vision.
If you wanna do your own movie and "**** the fans" than write your own stuff.
If you make a X-Men Movie (or Wolverine or what ever) than you have to please the fans that made the original big!
If you want to do your own Wolverine don't call him Wolverine.

This isn't about being nerdy.
It was the original concept that made the fanbase, so you can't just ignore it and steal the name.
(Like "I robot")
 
According to some nerds on here, it isn't about whether he would do a good job or not...it's about whether the nerds are pleased with what was put into the movie.

Seriously, comic book movies are movies. Comic books and books.

They are different. If I were him I'd **** the fans and do a comic book movie for myself

[FONT=&quot]I think he does want to do a comic book movie of his own, maybe a slasher film, too, as I know he didn't want to make the movie Jason Voorhees.

I think bone claws are an awesome idea, are a crucial part of Wolverine's character, and judging by the fact that his movie claws are NOT razor thin, there's plenty of room for bone claws to fit underneath. Also, the adamantium coating on Wolverine's skeleton only needs to be paper thin, so it's even more likely that movie Wolverine has bone claws underneath the adamantium ones.

Movie Wolverine has bone claws, without them, what good is he? He's basically a useless character. Before it was ever imagined Wolverine would get his adamantium pulled out, it didn't matter whether or not he had bone claws. But he did get his adamantium pulled out, and went years fighting with the bone claws. And then Origin was made. Therefore, Wolverine's bone claws have become canon. It's essential to the character that he has claws, either bone or adamantium, that pop out of his hands. Again, without them, Wolverine (who's my favorite superhero) is useless.

When movie Spider-Man was altered from his comic book counterpart to have organic webbing, the character was actually strengthened. If movie Wolverine is altered, though, so that he has no organic bone claws beneath the adamantium ones, the character is weakened, and the entire Origin story can be thrown in the garbage, which would REALLY infuriate fans![/FONT]
 
[FONT=&quot]
Movie Wolverine has bone claws, without them, what good is he? He's basically a useless character.
It's essential to the character that he has claws, either bone or adamantium, that pop out of his hands.
Again, without them, Wolverine (who's my favorite superhero) is useless.

When movie Spider-Man was altered from his comic book counterpart to have organic webbing, the character was actually strengthened. If movie Wolverine is altered, though, so that he has no organic bone claws beneath the adamantium ones, the character is weakened, and the entire Origin story can be thrown in the garbage, which would REALLY infuriate fans![/FONT]
What kind of nonesense your talking about?
Useless?
With a healing factor like Logans?
With a martial arts training?
Special tactics training?
Assassinationskills?
Enhanced senses?
Clawy essential?
Why?
Because he had them since his first appearance in the comic book?
That because he had a background before.
Why would he be weakend?
If the movie Logan never gets de-adamantionized it's without any intrest.
The Originstory wouldn't be hurt if the claws become cybernatical implants again.
In fact...i think a lot of fans would be pleased, escacially me, if the boneclawgarbage is drop out of the canon.
They always lead to useless arguments.
Some dc-style-crisis should get rid of the boneclawsubject.
And the stupid writer who invented them in the first place should be beaten with a wet towel!
:oldrazz:
 
I think the bone claws are sort of pointless, especially in the films. X2 definitively establishes this line from Stryker: "You were an animal then and you're an animal now. I just gave you claws." Retconning things so that they fit the newest plot to be had in the films gives us another X3, which this film seriously needs to avoid if it hopes to have replay value of any kind.

From the script leak it would seem they're just going to go ahead with the bone claws anyway, so it really doesn't matter what we think. I still think it's not a good idea, though. I never really found the bone claws interesting and purposeless outside of giving him something to do when he doesn't have adamantium grafted to his skeleton. Unless they can explore early on what makes him become the gruff, wary individual he is through the claws and get rid of them quick enough I'd rather not see them. I'd rather they explore a Logan with a high healing factor and a metahuman level of strength who is cursed with the claws due to the project he had to endure.
 
IMO...the whole bone claws thing was a stupid idea from the start till now.
They removed his adamantium but they wanted him to retain his claws, so they came up with this garbage.
Let's just clean up the continuity and forget about the bone claws.
Artifical cyberpunk claws as they where for years.

wow.
that's exactly how i feel.
marvel punked spidey with b.reilley too.
i hope daily one day arad will green light an 80s dallas tv style sequence with logan coming to in the shower...and the bone garbage is gone forever.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,294
Messages
22,081,660
Members
45,881
Latest member
lucindaschatz
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"