BOUGHT/THOUGHT March 14th

Thunderbolts 112. Seemed to me to be a filler. They talked a lot about nearly losing to Jack Flag. And Osbourn goes nuts. Best part, the ending.
Steel Spider is back, and he has acne.

New Avengers 28- I had no clue what was going on cause I haven't read any previous arcs.

Moon Knight- Pre Cap's assassination story plot.

Ghost Rider 9- Satan posess Jack O Lantern and resurects people from the grave to fight GR.
 
New Avengers #28: Another solid issue! I liked #27 alot and now, same goes for #28. Good writing from Bendis, and I'm really liking the way the team connects with eachother. Yu's art was once again great, I'm loving his work. The jumping back and forth of what happened to the team, and how they formed and how they are after the events of Civil War was just awesome. It all fit well. My only complaint is that I hope things pick up next issue.

9/10
 
Another week, another round of event gear-up. DC is getting their ducks in a row for another go at COUNTDOWN, another weekly series after 52, and WW3. Marvel, on the flipside, has quietly shifted to THE INITITAIVE which promises as many chapters as CW, only may actually prove to be more subtle and thus stronger. At least for now. As usual, some books will be counted as tie-in's that have little to do with it, and some won't that reference it heavilly (much like THE ETERNALS technically having more to do with CW than CW: X-MEN). How do these books fare?

Oh, and my LCS was out of PUNISHER: WAR JOURNAL. I like the book, but whether I get it depends on my mood to chase it down across Brooklyn or Manhattan.

And I STILL haven't found the time to post in the DYNAMO 5 & INVINCIBLE topics in the MISC. COMICS section. Guess being postive requires more time.

As always, full spoilers. If I repeat myself, forgive it. Or skip it. This is America, isn't it?

DREAD'S BOUGHT/THOUGHT for 3/14/07:

52 WEEK #45:
For a while in the beginning, the book attempted to balence focus over several "stars"; Black Adam, Booster Gold, Steel, Ralph Dibney and Question/Montoya. But as the last 45 weeks have come by, out of all of them, Black Adam has officially emerged from the pack as the unofficial star of 52. He and his story have seemed to get the most consistant full-issue focus and consider that WW3 involves around the world fighting him, that makes sense, to take a year to build him up. And coming as an outsider, who never read JSA and never gave two spits about Black Adam before, I believe it was successful. As the ruler of a Middle Eastern land, that instantly allows us to have some "real world" sensibility. Yes, if you really want to dig deep, the story suggests that Middle Eastern terror is merely responding to being provoked, which has been the Liberal drumbeat since before 9/11. But frankly this isn't ULTIMATES 2 and I don't believe the political bleating is heavy enough to warrent going that far. This is about Black Adam. He gained control of a nation and was ruling it with an iron fist, making all sorts of anti-U.S. alliances with other powers (like China and their league of heroes with ridiculously long names), except Intergang. Then Isis came into his life and he started to mellow, and then Osiris helped that. But then the Suicide Squad, run by "yet another evil secret gov't agency" via Amanda Waller provoked Osiris into murder and now Intergang has created four "Horsemen" to attack Kahndaq. Naturally, Black Adam survives and having been conviently given Isis' dying blessing of vengence, basically goes tearing about a nation that harbors Death, before ripping into Death itself. And it seems all this ties back to Dr. Sivana on Oolong Island, who still has a mad-on fetish for anything "SHAZAM". Meanwhile, the world reacts; some of China's heroes are hesitant and thoughtful, believing that BA was provoked, but they need to be prepared anyway. Atom-Smasher FINALLY seems to have gotten the hint that working with a squad of ruthless criminals-turned-federal hitmen is no way to redeem oneself, making him smarter than Speedball right now. And Checkmate is readying to have to challenge Black Adam, who easily is a "Superman" level demigod in terms of power, reaking millions of casualties in his search. In way, 52 portrays BA in a sort of Frank Miller-ish way; you understand that he was provoked, and is wanting pure vengence, and that is understandable and in fact sympathetic. Yet the tale doesn't shy away from noting that BA is anything close to rational or compassionate, as he slaughters innocent civilians of Bailya to both attempt to "lure" Death (in a way it worked) and to vent his frustration at being unable to save his wife. Montoya attempted to reason with him, but that went nowhere. In a way, Black Adam has gone from "anti-hero" to "sympathetic villian", and note that the two are NOT the same. Just because you can understand where a villian's motives are doesn't mean his/her actions are justified or not immoral; a factoid Marvel all but forgot with Iron Man this year. In a way it seems like a shame that I think 52 is not going to have a "finale" and simply may peter out to fuel the NEXT event, which frankly is a tease. But at least the ride so far has been enjoyable.

JLA CLASSIFIED #36: My last issue, as the Slott/Jurgebs tale "THE 4TH PARALLEL" is over, with the dimension-wide plot of Slott's Mary Sue, Red King, is finally undone by JLA's from more than one dimension. This title seems to be the dumping ground for "random" JLA scripts that don't make it into the core title (especially as it has an A-list team on it now), and I am curious as to how long ago Slott wrote it, because he worked at DC for quite a while before Marvel noticed him. The story isn't bad, but I can easily say it's probably the worst thing from Slott I have read in a while, which is in itself amazing as it beats the tar out of some writers doing their best work. There's nothing BAD about it, it just feels way too conveluted for it's own good, and some bits are cliches, and due to limitations these characters have to make lifetime, earth shattering decisions within a mere panel. "I can't sacrifice this entire universe just to save another; but oh well." Plus, IMO, Slott never topped his first chapter. Still this chapter has good generic superheroics from the league without the angst, which in these times feels almost ancient. Slott also gives some props to Plastic Man, which is a noble effort. And even if they are simplified, he gets the cast right. Good for a diversion.

GHOST RIDER #9: The last issue's depiction of CASUALTIES OF WAR seemed dubious as the only mention of it is in one panel, but this one makes it more apparent, although it is stretching the relevence at best. In CIVIL WAR #5, and P:WJ #2 or #3, Jack O'Lantern gets shot and killed by the Punisher. In GHOST RIDER, Jack O'Lantern is back from the dead with demonic new powers, and the reason? "Lucifer", who has been retconned without reason as Ghost Rider's creator over Mephisto, decided to animate his corpse. In a way it is a shame as I am starting to get tired of the "GR fights Satan every issue" schtick, almost as if in every episode of THE BATMAN, Batman fights The Joker. Once or twice is okay, but if this lasts for every arc, it may feel like a drag like BLUE BEETLE. Still, Way can write a good Ghost Rider brawl and Texeira's art is pretty good. I will say this, though; at least when Brubaker does a glaring retcon, like in DEADLY GENESIS, Brubaker doesn't pretend it isn't what it is. He digs into the history and attempts to rework it, reexplain it, make it work. It works for IRON FIST, because a lot of his past was vague, but sucked in DEADLY GENESIS, utterly. But at least Bru made the attempt. Way did this retcon and pretends it's not a retcon, and that's unforgiveable, especially since the movie version even used Mephisto! And it really pisses me off because if not for that, this would be a B+ book, but with the stink of that flaw that hovers over it (especially as GR is always fighting Satan), it can't do better than B- to me. And it frustrates me. An outright aweful book is one thing, but a book that could be great but is held back by ONE stupid mistake is even more irksome. It's not a deal-breaker for me, though. It's still solid Ghost Rider adventure. I wonder if Way will play up the angle of "Ghost Rider mistaken for the murders of children" to have an excuse for some Pro-SHRA heroes coming after him. I mean, superteams are cropping up all over the nation now, it would make sense and Ghost Rider hardly looks "friendly". I mean if they're going to do a CASUALTIES OF WAR, at least really run with it.

IRREDEEMABLE ANT-MAN #6: I know the premise is "the adventures of a *****ebag superhero", but Eric has really got nothing on Iron Man lately. As I noted above, Eric is more of an "anti-hero" and Iron Man has slowly nudged into the "sympathetic villian", the mastermind with a "cause for the greater good", like Dr. Doom, Magneto, Darkseid, et al. But no, Eric just wants to get by with the least amount of effort possible, look at nekkid ladies and score. Tell me you don't know a guy who'd do that with superpowers. Tell me you wouldn't consider it...at least for a second. Anyway, this issue finally wraps up the origin and gets all the "timelines" in order, finishing up the flashbacks and getting us fully into the present, explaining how Mitch got scarred (Eric accidentally burned half his face with his jet-fumes in their rematch fight) and getting us up to issue #1 and beyond for their 3rd fight. Kirkman is running on a blend of dark humor and madcap humor; a book about such a scoundrel really shouldn't be this fun, but it is. So, Ant-Man manages to trash Mitch's "seeker" tool to remain undetected for a while, Mitch is due to be tossed out of SHIELD so finding Eric is really his only goal in life, and Eric just wants to get buy, score with ladies, and has odd fantasies that he eventually will join the Avengers. After stowing away in Ms. Marvel's handbag, he may get his wish! Unlike ULTIMATE X-MEN, where Kirkman is obviously lost throwing various ideas against a wall, here he has a clear, focused, precise idea of what he is doing, and the book is all the better for it. Unlike BLUE BEETLE, which is fun but a bit generic, ANT-MAN is like nothing I've read from a Marvel "hero" in a good long while, which is just the kind of spark that a C-List franshise like Ant-Man needed. Sure, it's a Cult Status, but that is better than Zero Status (see anyone rooting for a Brother Voodoo series? That is what I mean). Plus, in a way it matches the "legacy" of the man who have been Ant-Man being shadey; Pym has had no end of emotional issues, Scott Lang started out a thief, and Eric is what he is. The other two more or less "reformed" but Eric doesn't seem to be in the mood to, and that could work for him. This is a Marvel where Green Goblin and Bullseye are beloved superheroes, and where Capt. America gets spat upon. The Mighty Avengers await you. At least Eric won't risk unleashing The Void if his favorite character dies on LOST or something. I'd say "it's the best title you're not reading", but a lot of the posters here do read it. It's the mainstreams who give it a pass, and that is a shame. If any book needed a tie-in boost, it's this one. And as Eric's entire world started from SHIELD, it does make some sense. Cory Walker teams with Kirkman for the next issue, and it should be a doozy. With a few of my usual beloved books over for the moment (ANNIHILATION, DR. STRANGE: OATH) or in turmoil (RUNAWAYS), plunky little ANT-MAN is rising in the ranks of the fave of the "pull" list. One of Marvel's more unique relaunches. I am glad Marvel is giving it a chance (it will outlive THE THING).

MOON KNIGHT #8: The first page says, "this story takes place shortly before CW #6-7", which got a "no sh**, Sherlock" sort of reply from my mind. In a way that takes some of the oomph of the story, but Finch's pace as an artist has been no secret so it was probably unavoidable. In a way the CASUALTIES OF WAR thing involves explaining why Moon Knight wasn't involved in the CW, considering he technically was a member of the West Coast Avengers for a stretch (a point not made in the book; Cap seemed to only know him as an ex-soldier/merc). Cap basically shows up and tells Marc to stay out of his way because he's unstable and little better than Castle, which in a way rings hollow because Cap allowed Punisher to work for him either out of desperation or extreme gullibility (did he REALLY expect Castle to stop offing villians?). Marc naturally notes that he isn't interested in their "capture the flag" battle because the streets are full of enough baddies who need to be maimed. But despite all this, this tidbit really has almost nothing to do with Huston's story and seems to have been thrown in as an aside to justify another tie-in. Marvel & Huston will play the "it was a plan all along" card, but Huston obviously wants to play with his "ladykiller" story, and the CoW thing is merely a distraction. It's a decently written distraction, but a spade is a spade. However, Khonshu is easily becoming one of the funniest characters in comics, at least in a "grim, dark" sort of way (the god, or Specter's insane mind, begs him to kill Cap & Iron Man throughout). Huston is showing his history by alluding that the killer who is seeking out Moon Knight is the Midnight Man, an obscure villian from the 70's-80's who was the father of Jeff Wilde, MK's former sidekick-turned-evil-cyborg-much-like-Bucky-only-10-years-earlier, Midnight. MK thinks he is dead, but naturally death is overrated these days (and it seems he has been "pieced" together, perhaps cybernetically like his son was). MOON KNIGHT is a character much like IRON FIST in that he has very few "good" rogues which means you either need to immediately use the few he has, as Huston did last arc, or invent new ones, or reinvent old ones. The benefit in a way is that low profile villians rarely attract hoopla if you alter them. Change Kingpin, and no way the fans will accept it. But do something new to a Z-Lister and almost anything is better than oblivion, and they usually are blanker slates. The tie-in is a distraction to the main story and while not a bad read, I am more interested in the actual story. Hopefully Huston can keep both on track. I also look forward to Mico Sauyan next issue; his sketches on Newsarama looked good and hopefully he can keep up a faster pace than Finch, who seems to need 5-7 weeks an issue. Still, another successful Marvel revamp that, like GHOST RIDER and unlike ANT-MAN, sells decently.

NEW AVENGERS #28: I wonder which will sell better this month: MA #1 or NA #28? Surely Marvel doesn't care either way as both are locks for an instant Top 5 for March, if not higher. Now, quibbles with this issue/story aside, I think it is still fair to say that so far, NEW AVENGERS is one of the few titles that actually improved in quality from CIVIL WAR, at least barring that awkward Hawkeye/Scarlet Witch mess. True, only 2 issues in and there are problems, but this is beating THE COLLECTIVE, easilly. Bendis is essentially using Kirkman's schtick to have the past/present in one issue in a jumble, only it isn't as seemless, perhaps because Bendis' tone is more serious. Highlights? This team seems to have more chemistry than the last incarnation, with everyone having teamed up many times either recently or in the past, and they all are on the same side of the social agenda. Yu's art is also not as bad here as it has been in some other works, although out of everyone his Dr. Strange and Spider-Man fare the worst. He also insists on mutant veins on people's arms like they were THE TOXIC AVENGER or something. The interesting thing here is, Marvel's general stance on CW and the Pro-SHRA looking like villians stance is officially, "we did our best to fool readers, but maybe went too far" and there has been some attempt to backtrack on that. But Bendis has no such delusions, and no one at Marvel is going to DARE challenge him. His Iron Man is a lying, manipulative egomaniac who has no quibbles about evoking the honor of a dead teammate to lure former friends into a trap, something Dr. Doom usually deams as a hobby. Bendis has no intention of having Iron Man be some "tragic hero" type, he just is sticking with the fascist *****ebag schtick. Marvel would rather kill 100 customers in cold blood than dare say "no" to Bendis at this stage, so if you like this honest take at modern Iron Man, enjoy. It is despicable, though, argueably moreso than some of what Eric O'Grady has done considering IM should know better. And there also is another scene of more SHIELD commandoes/soldiers appearing out of nowhere to attack Luke Cage than to attack any supervillian in the last 15 years. This works for NA but seems laughable if you buy into the "shared universe" thing that a crossover is supposed to evoke. So MOON KNIGHT can slaughter date-rapists in alleys and escape undetected in a limo (and even converse with detectives), but Luke Cage goes out for milk and he has a F'ing platoon up his rear? Where was this during MAXIMUM CARNAGE? Or whenever Rhino, Shocker, the Wrecking Crew, Mr. Hyde, etc go on almost weekly crime sprees? Man, maybe it IS because he's black. ;) Another minor quibble, which you can file in the "Sally Floyd" logic; if it is okay to complain to Cap about "not deciding sooner" which would have saved lives, why not complain at Dr. Strange for the same thing? He chooses to harbor allies and use his magic to aid them only AFTER the war is over, the nation lays shattered and some heroes (and dozens of civilians) lay dead? This is the same mage who literally travelled to Hell and back to save Wong from a natural illness when medicine had failed him, yet did nothing but get stoned with the Watcher while friends and allies died in the streets? I know it's not really Bendis' fault, as it wasn't his decision, but it still seems slightly jarring. Better late than never, I suppose, as Dr. Strange has harbored/assembled heroes plenty before. It does seem a little odd that Luke Cage is belting orders over Dr. Strange or Wolverine (who, groan all you like has led the X-Men in rare occasions, although he never liked to), but Cage has grown during his time here and under Bendis so I can buy it for the time being. Leaders aren't always the ones with the most experience or knowledge, but the ones who rise to the task when they have to and are clear and concise. I would expect a little more from Dr. Strange, though. Maybe he can take on an advisor/sage role. So far, for all the hoopla, Iron Fist is just sort of "there", contributing very little except for a few lines and an earthquake-punch last issue. So, while in the past they've been manipulated and lied to by Ms. Marvel and Iron Man into a trap (and, FYI, why could Wolverine smell that "Cap" was a fake, but Dr. Strange and all his billion spells, and his EYE OF AGOMOTTO which is all but MADE to see through illusions, could not!?), in the present, they hover around Echo as she OD's. They dodge the Hand at Silver Samurai's house, and at least Bendis remembers the guy has lost a hand, and about his rivalry with Logan. Sadly, their bickering comes off as infantile at best. "You cut me!" "You cut me first" "Waaa, I want my bah-bah!" Bendis has the fantastic ability to make everyone he writes sound like an emotionally stunted 7 year old, from heroes to cops to fanatics to gods. At one time this was considered a naunce, but has become very annoying, and could all but be written by computer program. Up next is, sigh, yet another fight with Elektra and ninjas. The Mighty Avengers are actually fighting villians like Mole Man and Ultron, and the NA are still fighting F'ING NINJAS! Despite starring Iron Man's Amazing Thugs, MIGHTY AVENGERS may be on better track to catch more of the classic feel of the franchise. NA remains, "Bendis Presents: Superheroes" despite all the attempts to say otherwise that it is an "Avengers" title. They're essentially more like SECRET DEFENDERS now. Still, not a bad issue, and definately better than some of the arcs pre-CW.

Yes, yes, I know, the Ronin stuff is a rehash, and calling this team "Avengers" is shallow...but as a team unto theselves, I'd argue they gel better than the pre-CW roster did. Hopefully Iron Fist does more; he really needs some blockbuster rep from an A-Book.
 
Ugh. Dread, I decided that the one review of yours that I'd read this week would be New Avengers, and I have to say, PLEASE download Firefox, because you have some heinous spelling problems.
 
Firefox doesn't fix my spelling problems:confused:. That could be because I'm flawless and never spell anything wrong, thuogh.

52 Week 45
I love the political backdrop of the DCU. Have loved it ever since Rucka brought it into Wonder Woman. With a lot of political writings it's a constant danger for the writer to just sound pretentious no matter whose side he's on. With Rucka though -- who is obviously a heavy hand in this -- it's always just interesting.

I'm not sure I buy Black Adam ruthlessly slaughtering innocents, though, much less the entire population of a country. Even at his very very worst, Adam would not confuse an enemy with an innocent. And he would care about the difference. If he were ranting or berserked or otherwise noticeably insane, it would be easier to swallow; yet the Adam we see here is completely aware of his actions and devoid of psychosis, regardless of how out of control and how angry/grieving he is. It's not only unforgiveable, it's not even very understandable.

And considering the severity of the actions, I'm pretty surprised that the JSA haven't tripped all over themselves in running the hell to Bialya and putting the psycho down the very first day that it happened, much less throughout the entire week. They've gone over and tried to beat down Adam for much, much lesser crimes before. It's true that there is a Freedom of Power Treaty in the DCU now which limits foreign superhero influence, but the other countries of the world don't seem like they'd mind someone dealing with Adam, and it's not like the JSA has always been so by-the-books that they wouldn't risk a little foreign antagonism for stopping wholesale genocide.

What's interesting though is that the Great Ten seems to be against Adam in this, even though we're being led to believe by upcoming covers that the Great Ten will be fighting against the JSA and the American heroes. So either the Chinese change their mind, or...or the American heroes will actually end up fighting on Adam's side.

Hmm.

(8 out of 10)

New Avengers #28
Bendis is a curious animal.

I have no doubt that he's one of the writers at Marvel who got to heavily orchestrate Civil War and have a substantial voice in its direction. And yet, right from the outset of the event, it always felt like Bendis was rolling his eyes right along with those of us who were rolling our eyes at the overdone turvy-topsy grimness of the Marvel that CW has created. "Let's pretend that the world isn't crazy and that cops still arrested criminals," says Luke Cage. It's almost as if Bendis borrowed that straight from these boards -- which wouldn't be a first for him

He'll write an Iron Man that's earnestly, pitifully bawling his eyes out in front of a dead friend due to genuine regret in another book this week...and yet here he'll write an Iron Man who's pulling some of the skeeziest, dickiest, most vulgar, most *****errific stunts conceivable such as using a fake corpse of said friend to lure his other friends into yet another trap.

It's all very...curious.

Oh, and the issue itself was fine. Trite, at times, but generally fine.

(7 out of 10)


Wonder Woman #5
It shocked me that they didn't even change the cover for this week. This Dodsons' cover was obviously meant for the original fith issue by Heinberg, and it just as obviously is not finished. A blank blue background as a background? Heinberg couldn't at least let the Dodsons know what the heck to draw in the background instead of blank blue?

As for the issue itself...well, it's quite good. Better than you'd expect. But it reads like a fill-in. Which is to be expect since it is a fill-in...a fill-in in more ways than one. But again, there's nothing wrong with the story (if Pfeifer can churn out this level of work on such short notice, Heinberg has no excuses. None), or with the art (which really surprised me; Borjes and Diaz can churn out this level of quality work on such short notice? Props. Now other artists who are late look even more lazy), or with the delivery. But, unfortunately, it still does read like a fill-in.

And, also unfortunately, my Anal Retention Alarm got set off a couple times by this story. Are you trying to tell me that there has never been a women's shelter in the DCU before that got inspired into creation by Wonder Woman? But...but there has. I've seen them. I've read about them. They've been shown before. Well obviously, because it's such a no-brainer idea; it'd be odd if they hadn't shown up in the DCU before. And then are you trying to tell me that Sarge Steel would actually be wasting his people's time by sending them to this shelter looking for some tenuous possible connection to Wonder Woman that obviously isn't there?

Regardless, this one story in particular in my opinion really showed the upsides of Wonder Woman having a secret identity. Like I said, she's visited women's shelters before. She's been very hands-on before in relief efforts and charity work. But this issue shows the exact sort of reaction she'd get in a women's shelter as Diana Prince, and the exact sort of reaction she'd get as Wonder Woman, and it's interesting as hell. As Wonder Woman she can inspire people, yes, but they'll also gawk and fawn and hero-worship and practically get down on bended knee. As Diana Prince, she can interact with these people on their level and truly partake in the human experience of it all. For all that I btch about DC's claims of Wonder Woman not being "human" enough pre-IC because I thought she was plenty human enough, thankyouverymuch...it's easy to see that, if all the reactions she'd been getting were the former typ and none of the latter, this woman would become a bit detached and out of touch with humanity. I had hoped that Heinberg wouldn't be the only writer to try and fix that, and thankfully that doesn't like it will be the case. This is the sort of Wonder Woman that I wish we could get more of. Not the deer-in-headlights foreigner that she is in Manhunter, or the battle-minded warrior woman that she is in JLA. I was skeptical of Pfeifer at first having so much reign over WW's world, but after this I think I'd be pretty comfortable with Pfeifer taking over this book after Picoult is done.

The ending confused the poo out of me, though. Who exactly killed the guy so gorily? The woman obviously didn't. Diana obviously didn't. Was it the Amazons or something? And why would they? Is this supposed to lead into them attacking? It's all very...confusing.

(7.9 out of 10)


Thunderbolts #112
So, apparently every single member of this group utterly bugfck insane, including their boss.

Yippee.

(5 out of 10)


Green Arrow #72
...Hnn. I believe I'm going to drop this book. Again.

Which is sort of an easy decision, considering that there's only three issues of this series left and nothing I do would matter in any way anyway.

I dropped this book the first time in 2005 because I was getting annoyed of storyline after storyline after storyline of Ollie running around like a complete n00b and getting utterly pantsed at every possible opportunity; reading the book was like an course in how not to be a competent superhero. I picked up this book again OYL because it seemed like Ollie and his crew had finally gotten their sht together and it that the days of random villains showing up and invariably making them look like gigantic ******s were over.

And now, I'm dropping the book again because those days obviously aren't over.

Last issue, Ollie beat the Red Hood and then got out-preptimed or something. Batman beat Brick -- and I'm still not quite sure why Brick was fighting him in the first place -- except that in beating Brick he fell right into their trap. Two seasoned heroes, getting utterly schooled like amateurs. And then this issue, Speedy fights Red Hood ineffectually for about a dozen pages, loses, and gets psychologically pwned or something, all the while Batman and GA are running around like headless chickens, eventually arriving too late to do anything, since Reddy just leaves after their lil' "talk," satisfied that he has properly and verbally pwned her, or something. Gee, pretty much like the Riddler did. And next issue it looks like Deathstroke is going to make GA look like a fool again, or something. Yeah um...thanks, but no thanks. This is not why I read this book.

Winick has a way of writing villains that no only feels like too much, but is also too annoying. Not only is the villain going to beat you soundly, he's also going to psychoanalyze the cck out of you, talking endlessly and on and on about his issues and your issues and emo emo angst Nietzsche please do me. Less is more, Judd. Less. Is. MORE. If there's anything more annoying than a villain that talks to much, it's a self-justifying villain that talks too much. Winick did the same exact damn thing with Dr. Light.

And, like Meltzer, Winick obviously didn't get the memo where Batman is not supposed to be a gigantic dick anymore.

(4.2 out of 10)
(6 out of 10 for the entire arc)


Teen Titans 44#
Big action. Not a whole lot of depth. I just realized that I don't care about a single one of Deathstroke's Titans. And considering that this entire arc is about them, that's a bad sign.

Jericho and Ravager are growing on me, though.

(6.5 out of 10)


Tales of the Unexpected #6
While I wouldn't say that I'm getting bored with the Spectre story in this, I'll definitely say that it's becoming very, very cliched. Crispus meets some evil mofos, angsts about it, and then turns into the Spectre after the mofo commits some horrible crime and wacky gratuitous bloodiness ensues. If you think that 52 is the most violent book that DC is currently publishing, you obviously haven't been reading this.

And it would be okay if Cris would find something different each time to angst about, but now we've pretty much gotten six issues of him angsting about the exact same thing. The Phantom Stranger even shows up here and is all, "Wait, you're still angsting about this?" This story as a whole isn't bad, but I'll have to see how it concludes, and hope that it concludes satisfyingly.

I'm having a lot more fun with the Dr. Thirteen story which is, my Buffy, the epitome of CRACK. It cracks so good.

(2.3 out of 5 for the Spectre story)
(5 out of 5 for the Dr. 13 story)
(7.3 out of 10 overall)
 
Buffy #1: I have been anxiously anticipating this book. Anxiously. Let me put it in perspective for you: I was sitting at work today, thinking about how much I wanted Buffy #1, which would be in my hands in what was logically just a few short hours, but which stretched out before me in impossible, leaping eternities nonetheless. While I was sitting there thinking (seeing me actually work at work is pretty rare, I'll admit), I hit up Wikipedia and started reading random stuff about Buffy and Angel, then I came on the Hype to talk about Buffy in the season 8 thread over in the Misc. Comics section, then I looked up some more random stuff on Wiki and TV.com, then I went on Amazon and impulse-bought both the Buffy "Chosen" Collection and the entire Angel series in one fell swoop. Yes, I spent a cool $270 because I couldn't wait for a $3 comic. I don't regret it, of course; the DVDs just give me something new to look forward to after the Buffy comic. Oh, and I also spent about $100 last week buying trades of various Buffy comics from the previous Dark Horse run.

So I've established that Buffy #1 is likely the most indirectly expensive comic I've yet purchased, but having read it, I can now say that it was totally worth it. Reading those previous Buffy comics actually gave me a perfect foil for appreciating Buffy #1. The former, while engaging enough, always felt like adaptations of Buffy. Minor details would be off here and there, the mood wouldn't quite be right, and it'd all add up to something approaching the TV show's goodness but not quite reaching it. Buffy (season 8) #1, on the other hand, is Buffy. The gun-toting paratrooper bit at the beginning was a bit odd, I thought, but as soon as I read the dialog on said paratrooper page, everything slipped right back into the familiar rhythm of a Buffy episode, with an improvement here and there, no less. For example, in a lot of ways, I can see narration boxes' being the best thing that could happen to Buffy. While it's still too early to judge the Buffy comics on any meaningful level, the atmosphere and wit of the earlier seasons is there in spades already. Also, thanks to the big gap between the end of the TV series and the beginning of this comic series (over a year, according to Whedon), it's exciting just to see where all of the characters are now, and the reveals in this issue are pretty great. Xander totally embraces the patched look and does his best Nick Fury impression, Dawn looks like she might finally contribute something interesting instead of boring subplots for once, and the big cliffhanger ending is quite intriguing (even if it was spoiled a bit by future issues' solicits). The ostensible Big Bad as of this issue promises interesting future developments and a definitely worthy challenge, too. Also, there are a number of newbies who show up in this issue that look promising--most notably Leah, the Scottish Slayer, and Renee, the cute and apparently geeky computer chick at Slayer HQ. I find myself wanting to know more about them almost as much as I want to see where the rest of the Scoobies wound up.

The art is by Georges Jeanty, and the art in this issue is great even by his standards. The last thing I saw Jeanty on was The American Way, which was great; his work here is even better. One could argue that his actor likenesses aren't particularly accurate (Cliff Richards' were much more accurate in the previous Buffy series), but I actually appreciate that quite a bit. I've always thought that rendering comic book characters to be identical to actors or celebrities was tacky (yes, I'm looking at you, Ultimate Nick L. Jackson :o) and Jeanty manages to keep the characters distinct while fully bringing them into the comic book realm. As with the writing, the art--especially its divergence from photorealistic actor portrayals--makes the comic feel truly like a new season of Buffy, if that makes any sense. Strip away the familiar performances and faces and you find that the cores of the characters are still there, with their identities and voices intact--Buffy's still a petite blonde who can kick an incongruous amount of ass for the size of her frame, Xander's still the normal dude who's adapted himself into a witness for all the weird crap that goes on, Dawn's still a petulant ball of angst, etc.--and that, like the writing, made me feel like this was the Buffy I'd known all the time, rather than adaptation of the "real" Buffy from TV.

So, if it wasn't clear by now: I loved this issue. It struck exactly the right chord, bringing the familiarity of Buffy, her cast of characters, and her world back while simultaneously introducing loads of new concepts and characters that promise interesting developments to come. Coupled with the creative pool that Whedon has revealed is lined up to handle the rest of the season, that leaves the future of the series looking quite bright indeed. I can only hope that Jeanty either continues drawing the series or is succeeded by someone equally talented. :up:

I lost all respect for you, and any one else here who is that much of a Buffy fan, I thought you were cool :csad: , Geek :cmad:

Can people stop taking the title of the book so damn literally. ****ing A.

Quit crying. :o
 
This gets its very own post, because.

Buffy the Vampire Slayer #1
I kinda feel like kicking myself. I knew this would happen, and like a fool I did nothing to prevent it.

The problem, basically, is that I knew what would happen in most of this comic before even actually reading it. I'd kept such close web watch on this project that I'd pretty much read the book before it was released. It wouldn't have been such a problem for the TV show, since a TV show episode is an hour long and the paltry info I'd webbed up beforehand would hardly constitute the teaser. But a single comic issue is only 24 pages. If you'd already seen the five-page preview on comicbookcontinuum or whatever, you'd already seen twelve and a half minutes of the show. Add the pages of the giant Dawn and you're up to seventeen and a half minutes. Insert panels of Xander Fury, extra Buffy kicking stuff that was on EW.com, and a few choice panels of the the government types doing their thing, and we're up to about twenty five minutes. I'm Asian; trust me, the math is solid. An hour-long TV show, and I'd already been spoiled to twenty-five minutes of it before it aired. That's almost half! If you chopped a person in half, they'd DIE!

Never again, damn you. Never again.

Oh, how was the comic? Well, let's just put it this way: just on principle, I feel sorry for the poor mofos who haven't watched through the seven seasons of this show. Y'know...just on principle. You poor mofos. Now I feel even more sorry for you because, well, here's the eighth season and you're kinda really missing out. You poor mofos.

But then again...sure, this is the eighth season, but it's not the eighth season in the way that the third season was the third season and the sixth season was the sixth season. This is more like the "eighth season," emphasis on the air-quotes. It is quite different from watching a television show, which is both a strength and a big weakness. Strength because you can do things in a comic that you can't do in any other medium. Weakness because as much as Joss embodies these characters, he can't ever possibly replace a live actor. Those actors are the ones who breathed life into his characters -- check out the original Buffy pilot, for instance, to see what a massive honkin' difference a different actress for Willow would have made -- and their absence is unfortunately felt.

How new-reader friendly is all of this? Joss claims that he took some efforts to make it accessible. I don't imagine that it's really that much harder to get into than a lot of other comic books that have been going on for a while; everyone has to jump on a bandwagon at some point, after all, and it's very unlikely that your bandwagon is going to Spider-Man #1, more like Spider-Man #43893785.

I'm slightly interested in where Joss is going with this Slayers vs the government thingy. Out of experience, I realize that Joss has never...ever...in any of his works...ever depicted any government or big business or powerful organization as anything but corrupt in the noggin, so my gut instinct is that these guys will be no different. But then, so far we haven't seen much evidence of that...they seem, so far, like ordinary military looking out for the interests of America. Because, at the surface, you would think that an army of superpowered women using magic and operating on their own agenda would be a wee bit suspicious, wouldn't you? And other than the surprise Tony Stark cameo, these military men seem generally good-minded. But then, maybe I'm just too jaded; after reading a year's worth of the sort of military minds that went into Civil War, Genghis Khan would probably seem good-minded.

Love the interaction between Buffy and Xander...it's so genuine. Not all happy, but genuine. Can't wait for Willow.

It's too bad that we don't see the return of the more familiar ex-Potentials like Vi and Rona -- I don't mind Kennedy, but I'll suffer her absence just for the sake of those who do mind her quite a bit;) -- but these new Slayers seem to be just as bouncy with personality (and let's be honest, several degrees less annoying), so that's all good too.

Most people are guessing that Amy's "boyfriend" is either Ethan or Rack resurrected, but none of those are my guesses. For one thing, Ethan was far away from Sunnydale, along with the Initiative, by the time it cratered. And if not Ethan, then Rack just don't seem likely either. Most importantly, notice that Tony Stark specifically said that Amy wanted access to their magical hardware, and that her boyfriend wanted a weapons lab. A weapons lab? No witch or warlock would be interested in that. Who in the Buffyverse built weapons? I'd almost guess Warren, but Warren's dead...or is he? Because other than him, I can't think of a single "weapons"-oriented character from the show.

Finally, "LOL" to the metaphor of Dawn "growing up" lololololollll. My guess is that she'll play big role (LOLOLOLOL) in the defense of the castle when Amy's attack comes.

So yes, this book is awesome and essentially everything I'd hoped for. If you're missing out on this, sucks to be you:(.

(9 out of 10)
 
MOON KNIGHT #8: But despite all this, this tidbit really has almost nothing to do with Huston's story and seems to have been thrown in as an aside to justify another tie-in. Marvel & Huston will play the "it was a plan all along" card, but Huston obviously wants to play with his "ladykiller" story, and the CoW thing is merely a distraction.

Actually, you're both right and wrong. If you go back and read the interviews with Huston when he was announced, he always had guest stars planned for this arc to quote "Get Moon Knight reacquaited with the marvel Universe" but you're right in the sense that he had to add a CW touch to everything (I'm sure CW was going on already and he said he would talk about it in the book) but it was never supposed to be the focus of these stories.

This was my Darthphere corrects Dread post of the day.:oldrazz:
 
Ugh. Dread, I decided that the one review of yours that I'd read this week would be New Avengers, and I have to say, PLEASE download Firefox, because you have some heinous spelling problems.

Because I would be the first SHH poster in recorded history to have typo's.

And then when I complain that some people nitpick me to death far more than some others, Darth feels I'm digging for pity.

In my defense, I was in a rush last night to finish my reviews so I could go home and have a shot at 5 hours of sleep (I actually got 4). Sometimes I have more time and can correct errors and other days it's like, "I have 1 hour or less" and I blam it.

Surely, the ultimate crime. :rolleyes:

Actually, you're both right and wrong. If you go back and read the interviews with Huston when he was announced, he always had guest stars planned for this arc to quote "Get Moon Knight reacquaited with the marvel Universe" but you're right in the sense that he had to add a CW touch to everything (I'm sure CW was going on already and he said he would talk about it in the book) but it was never supposed to be the focus of these stories.

This was my Darthphere corrects Dread post of the day.:oldrazz:

Yes, I know about those interviews, from both Newsarama and WIZARD, and it's well and good that Huston wants to elevate Moon Knight. He writes the stories well enough, Finch provided slow-but-name-recognized-art and he's made this B-Lister sell within the Top 35 despite the title being unofficially a bimonthly; a commendable feat. That said, I kind of felt the CW stuff this issue was a distraction at best to the main story. I have the feeling this "Midnight Man" killer story could be done in 3 issues without distraction, but if he keeps up the team-ups then it's easily justified to 5-6.

It's sort of a give and take. While it is interesting to see how other heroes react to the return of Moon Knight, especially as he has become bloodier and more violent than he's been in years (see MTU #7 to see his old M.O.), I do grow weary of writers who stretch out small plots maybe double their lifespan for trade. Next month sees The Punisher come in to distract from the main story. Although I suppose as the first trade was all MK, I suppose now Huston wants to complete his first year with a lot of guest appearences to "settle" things. I never said it was bad. Just a distraction at times, or at least it was this month. Considering Punisher usually hunts after baddies, maybe next month should flow better. I don't mind if they have flow, like MK running into Spider-Man in an alley last month. The Cap thing just seemed more obligatory and ground the story more to a halt on an aside, I felt. Again, not a bad read, but it was what it was.

Oh, and much as it is curious that ASTONISHING X-MEN readers have been shamelessly sacrificed to CIVIL WAR (Cassaday's been yanked off to do a one-shot, dooming the next issue of that title not to ship until at least May, and that is if it's on time), MOON KNIGHT apparently has gotten the same treatment, as Finch has also been yanked for "more important" assignment (like a YOUNG AVENGERS one-shot). However, MK is faring better; the replacement artist's sketches look good and frankly, any artist that has a shot at being faster than Finch is for the best. I mean, this title came out almost a year before this last volume of GHOST RIDER and GHOST RIDER is an issue ahead.

Still, Moon Knight's rise to the big leagues also has to mean he shows up in other books with Huston's mindset in mind. But Huston can do what he can. Interestingly, Huston does the "grit noir" thing that is usually Bendis' A-game and his dialogue is crisper. Except for Marc's doctor who is a flaming gay stereotype, although I forgive him because that line about Luke Cage's old shirt was rather funny.

Oh, and was it just me or did that domino-masked villian that Moon Knight tackled vaguely resemble the Riddler? I'm drawing a blank if he's supposed to be another obscure baddie like Midnight Man, but it is no big deal. It was a cool scene.
 
Not liking MK anymore - the guy's just psycho. Its fun when he's an agent of vengeance but even he doesnt know if he's imagining Khonshu or not. BUt when he starts just hammering razor moons into guys legs even when they're down... too insane. Every criminal there is going to be getting out in three hours simply by not only is there no Moon Knight to testify, but also because none of the people he's "saving" are likely to say it wasnt him who brutally carved up their assailant.
 
Not liking MK anymore - the guy's just psycho. Its fun when he's an agent of vengeance but even he doesnt know if he's imagining Khonshu or not. BUt when he starts just hammering razor moons into guys legs even when they're down... too insane. Every criminal there is going to be getting out in three hours simply by not only is there no Moon Knight to testify, but also because none of the people he's "saving" are likely to say it wasnt him who brutally carved up their assailant.

I can understand your point. At the time time, I kind of like Huston's approach; the old approach to MK left him as too much of a cross between Daredevil and Batman, only with maybe half the grit at times. Huston is playing off the "god/sanity" angle and making him almost seem like a vigilante teleported from Dark Horse's SIN CITY. While Moon Knight is resisting Khonshu's urges to murder, that doesn't prevent him from viciously maiming crooks. I assume that even if those crooks did escape jail, their injuries could take months/years to heal and they argueably could be traumatized. After all, if Khonshu is in fact real, then Marc Specter works for the whims of a god who craves vengence, not man's law, and has manipulated Specter at every turn to do his bidding, including reviving him from the dead and allowing him to overcome physical injury (and boosting his strength sporatically in moonlight).

But maybe that is because I like gritty characters sometimes and with Wolverine a New Avenger, there has to be some competition for Punisher and Ghost Rider (the latter who operates in the midwest anyway).

As an aside, BrainWilly's motivations for leaving GREEN ARROW, basically being sick and tired of what a helpless "n00b" Oliver is supposedly written as, matches some of what wore on me with USM that naturally reached the boiling point over Clone Sage Rehashed.

And someone seriously needs to tell Bendis that "Yikes-a-hooty!" is not funny, unless you are on your 11th shot of Scotch or suffering an internal hemmorage and doped up on Morphine. I almost preferred "tuchas". Almost.
 
Firefox doesn't fix my spelling problems:confused:. That could be because I'm flawless and never spell anything wrong, thuogh.

If you had paid attention you would've noticed that Firefox underlined that word for you to correct.;):up:
 
Perhaps one day dread will be able to review a bendis book and comment on the book alone without mentioning his theories and imaginings on the man writing it.


I know I rarely write reviews and generally only visit this thread to nitpick, but by god it gets utterly stale to hear the same (almost baseless) rantings over and over in what are otherwise good reviews.
 
Perhaps one day dread will be able to review a bendis book and comment on the book alone without mentioning his theories and imaginings on the man writing it.


I know I rarely write reviews and generally only visit this thread to nitpick, but by god it gets utterly stale to hear the same (almost baseless) rantings over and over in what are otherwise good reviews.

Actually, I thought I'd toned it down for NA #28.

I see an interesting trend in these B/T's, at least from my perspective, from an objective standpoint. When I first started getting a "rep" for elongated reviews/rants/musings on these threads, I usually got positive feedback, "Good stuff Dread" and all that. But at this point I've been doing them for almost 2 years so at this point now all that good-will has evaporated and now I get little but criticisms. "You repeat yourself", "You mispelled stuff", "You rant too much", "You're ignorant and here's why, in a pompus tone to match yours: ____" and so on. Objectively, I can imagine this may be what some professional writers have felt about the Internat fan community, including virtually all of the writers who sometimes feel the brunt of criticism (at least so long as they do underwhelming stories, or are notorious, or whatever).

Will this result in me abandoning that practice, having had a taste of my own medicine? No. I'm a hypocrite, just like everyone else is in some way, I simply am honest enough to admit it. Still, I thought it was a very interesting development, and knowing this, maybe I won't engage in as many emotional catfights like last week's anger over Cap.
 
No "CIVIL WAR THE CONFESSION" Dread?
 
No "CIVIL WAR THE CONFESSION" Dread?

No. I just wasn't in the mood for more CW than I have to at this point, and I feel that was the right decision, as everything else was a book that pleased me more or less. If some aspects of CW irritate me, especially the Cap/IM bits, why deliberately seek them in a one-shot?
 
Teen Titans #44 - All out action as is expected.I really like this book,straight up action with good old superhero team action.Lots of ass-kicking and no silly team banter between the punches.

Punisher War Journal #5
- Love how Fraction builds the story up out of nowhere and brings it altogether in the end.It's good to see all the Cap stuff from issue #3 coming to fruition.I'm really liking these contained stories.Fraction is doing it big right now.

Planetary:Leaving the 20th Century - Amazing.As good as the first 2 books were,Book 3 really starts bringing things together and gives more insight on Eli's past.The concepts in this book are just jaw dropping,it's going to be a sad long wait for the final trade.
 
Perhaps one day dread will be able to review a bendis book and comment on the book alone without mentioning his theories and imaginings on the man writing it.


I know I rarely write reviews and generally only visit this thread to nitpick, but by god it gets utterly stale to hear the same (almost baseless) rantings over and over in what are otherwise good reviews.

If Bendis would get some talent writing superhero comics, it wouldn't be an issue.
 
Actually, I thought I'd toned it down for NA #28.

I see an interesting trend in these B/T's, at least from my perspective, from an objective standpoint. When I first started getting a "rep" for elongated reviews/rants/musings on these threads, I usually got positive feedback, "Good stuff Dread" and all that. But at this point I've been doing them for almost 2 years so at this point now all that good-will has evaporated and now I get little but criticisms. "You repeat yourself", "You mispelled stuff", "You rant too much", "You're ignorant and here's why, in a pompus tone to match yours: ____" and so on. Objectively, I can imagine this may be what some professional writers have felt about the Internat fan community, including virtually all of the writers who sometimes feel the brunt of criticism (at least so long as they do underwhelming stories, or are notorious, or whatever).

Will this result in me abandoning that practice, having had a taste of my own medicine? No. I'm a hypocrite, just like everyone else is in some way, I simply am honest enough to admit it. Still, I thought it was a very interesting development, and knowing this, maybe I won't engage in as many emotional catfights like last week's anger over Cap.

Personally speaking, I enjoy your reviews, as you can see, I have to read them to nitpick them.:oldrazz: Its just that sometimes, you go off on some crazy tangents like the whole E-Music card thing and other things.
 
Also, whoever is bumping that other crappy Bought/Thought thread, stop, you're stupid.
 
Actually, I thought I'd toned it down for NA #28.

You did in so much as you didn't type the word "ego" but it's still present to the point of over powering the review.

I see an interesting trend in these B/T's, at least from my perspective, from an objective standpoint. When I first started getting a "rep" for elongated reviews/rants/musings on these threads, I usually got positive feedback, "Good stuff Dread" and all that. But at this point I've been doing them for almost 2 years so at this point now all that good-will has evaporated and now I get little but criticisms.

I would disagree to a point, you just need to look at all the praise and anticipation for your clone saga reviews (admittedly from predictable people but we can't have everything).
However to say people do feel more inclined to critique you I'd agree.


Will this result in me abandoning that practice, having had a taste of my own medicine? No. I'm a hypocrite, just like everyone else is in some way, I simply am honest enough to admit it. Still, I thought it was a very interesting development, and knowing this, maybe I won't engage in as many emotional catfights like last week's anger over Cap.

Can't say I'd want change in your reviewing style, I just think you seem to lose a lot of objectivity when reviewing something by bendis (and even then I really don't think it's a personal thing for you as your bendis reviews have been reasonably positive of late) it just seems from the outside looking in you write the snarkiness to entertain the particularly vocal bashers on the board.



As darth said though and it applies equally to me we read because we enjoy :)
 
Personally speaking, I enjoy your reviews, as you can see, I have to read them to nitpick them.:oldrazz: Its just that sometimes, you go off on some crazy tangents like the whole E-Music card thing and other things.

Hey, that E-Music card mucked with the staples of my MOON KNIGHT #7 so much that 2 pages pretty much fall out. :( It makes me feel like how I handled comics in pre-K. And so now I am in the dilemma of bothering to buy a second copy of #7 just to have one where those 2 pages are more stable, or not wasting the $3 as I don't plan to sell it anyway, so it's "value" is less important (even if I like keeping my comics as Near Mint as possible).

Crazy tangents are part of the package. You can't get Banner unless you want to deal with the Hulk. But while it's on my mind I may try to tone it down.

You did in so much as you didn't type the word "ego" but it's still present to the point of over powering the review.



I would disagree to a point, you just need to look at all the praise and anticipation for your clone saga reviews (admittedly from predictable people but we can't have everything).
However to say people do feel more inclined to critique you I'd agree.




Can't say I'd want change in your reviewing style, I just think you seem to lose a lot of objectivity when reviewing something by bendis (and even then I really don't think it's a personal thing for you as your bendis reviews have been reasonably positive of late) it just seems from the outside looking in you write the snarkiness to entertain the particularly vocal bashers on the board.



As darth said though and it applies equally to me we read because we enjoy :)

Oh, well, I'd never deny being a Bendis-basher. I feel in many ways he has evolved into an unofficial Vice-President EIC and naturally as he is Marvel's #1 writer without question, he has a higher standard to live up to in my mind than, say, Kirkman or Slott.

Once I let USM go, yeah, some of his work since has been solid. As I said, NEW AVENGERS has easily improved in story quality since CW. MIGHTY AVENGERS, despite some questionable bits and that cheesecake ending, is off to a good start, argueably closer to the actual Avengers than NA. The thing with Bendis is his end results are sometimes horribly hit-or-miss despite his constant "themes" (like his bobble-head dialogue). Some stories are good enough to earn him his title as Marvel's #1, and then some are gaullingly bad to the point of being almost unreadable, with some range in-between.

On the opposite end, I am sure I lose some objectivity with some writers that I personally prefer, as everyone does, like Vaughan, Slott, Kirkman, etc. Like if they write a misfire, I can let it go, but Bendis gets a 200 word tirade. I admit that. I do try to be objective and see merits and flaws in stuff, although I'm not perfect.

As for tone, I am sarcastic by nature in RL so that comes off in my text a lot; I also tend to use extreme exaggerations for "humor". Naturally that is all subjective.

Taking a step back and thinking about all this hopefully prevents a repeat of last week/few days ago when I just completely flipped off the handle at criticism and that was unfair to everyone.
 
The Lone Ranger #5-It's still such a great feeling to go every month and buy a comic that my dad used to read when he was a kid (my dad being in his mid 50's) and one that I can actually get him to read. Nostalgia aside, this is just a damn solid comic. It's a perfect reimagining/update of the Lone Ranger from those old radio and black and white tv shows. A more compatible hero akin to Jonah Hex and a much tamer Loveless. Westerns haven't been this good in a long time.

Brett Matthews has been spending a lot of time building up the character of Lone Ranger from timid John Reid, to ass kicking Lone Ranger. The updating of Tonto has been done extraordinarily well and classy. What I like about this comic is its realism. Funny enough, hardcore Ranger fans have actually been pretty vocal about the violence in the comic (as loud as all 5 hardcore Ranger fans can be I guess). The issue really completes the transformation and now we finally have the Lone Ranger we all know and love setting up the last issue of the arc where he will come face to face with the man killing his fallen rangers families. I think it speaks volumes about Matthews that he allows the art to tell the story and doesn't get bogged down in a barrage of dialogue.

Speaking of the art, Sergio Carrielo has just been done such a magnificent job and with Dean White on colors sets the mood and feel of an old Texas long gone. I think its a good move to abstain from using an inker. John Cassaday is credited with "art direction" whatever that is supposed to mean, but he makes some pretty covers (suck on that Astonishing X-Men fans).

The Lone Ranger is one great book, and while I can see where some have problems with the pacing, its really all about the journey. I have high hopes for this book, and can't wait for the end of this arc and getting some more stories out of The Lone Ranger.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"