• The upgrade to XenForo 2.3.7 has now been completed. Please report any issues to our administrators.

Bought/Thought October 1st, 2008

Just letting you guys know a pretty decent comic debuted last week, called City Of Dust. It's from Radical Comics, who put out the excellent Hercules: The Thracian Wars recently. This is by Steve Niles, and is about a futuristic society, where religion and imaginary stories are forbidden. If you are into those kind of stories (or,simply crave something different each month), this first issue read very well, and I cannot wait for the second issue.
 
Marvel Apes 3
Well I gotta say this issue was fairly interesting. I like the series cause it doesn't take itself too seriously, it knows it's a comic book about monkeys. The whole Baron Blood thing kinda confused me. But so far I'm enjoying the book, although I have yet to see a single ape throw it's feces.
 
Just letting you guys know a pretty decent comic debuted last week, called City Of Dust. It's from Radical Comics, who put out the excellent Hercules: The Thracian Wars recently. This is by Steve Niles, and is about a futuristic society, where religion and imaginary stories are forbidden. If you are into those kind of stories (or,simply crave something different each month), this first issue read very well, and I cannot wait for the second issue.

:up:

City of Dust was good. Hercules: The Thracian Wars was, also. Radical Comics rocks, and actually, wasn't this first issue of City of Dust oversized for normal price?

There's an upcoming comic published by Radical that I'm hyped for - Shrapnel.
 
Marvel Adventures: Fantastic Four was pretty good.

The Mad Thinker sucks out Reed Richard's brain and puts it into a machine he's using to control his android army. Turns out that there's a problem here being that this is Reed Richards and he's smarter than you are, so his digitized brain gains control and makes the robots beat up Thinksie, who turns out to have just been an android. Good times.

Then there's a B-story about Ben Grimm looking after a kid for the Big Brother program. It does kind of make me wonder when the "hothead" Human Torch got transformed into a happy-go-lucky slacker, with the hothead bit being completely grafted onto Ben. But that's the case for everything 4-related these days.
 
Seriously, it is one of Mel Brooks' best, and just got a newer DVD release a few years ago. Scope it out. It's cheap on Amazon. :up:


yes, watch Blazing Saddles. Next to Young Frankenstein it is one of the best Brooks movies ever made. :up:
 
Don't forget History of the World Part One. The Spanish Inquisition sequence is proof that Mel Brooks doesn't give a damn what he makes jokes about.
 
Yes, and that one. In fact, the Moses scene always makes me laugh. :p
 
And Blazing Saddles, if made today would be the most protested, sued film EVER.

VERY few people realize that Richard Pryor helped Brooks write that movie, which is what makes it so amazingly funny. You can even tell which lines he wrote too.

DAMN I love that movie. Scathingly funny across all races, sexes and hell, even animals get abused to some degree. Equal opportunity bashing.
 
And Blazing Saddles, if made today would be the most protested, sued film EVER.

VERY few people realize that Richard Pryor helped Brooks write that movie, which is what makes it so amazingly funny. You can even tell which lines he wrote too.

DAMN I love that movie. Scathingly funny across all races, sexes and hell, even animals get abused to some degree. Equal opportunity bashing.
the way the world should be and the way i live my life :D
 
Don't forget History of the World Part One. The Spanish Inquisition sequence is proof that Mel Brooks doesn't give a damn what he makes jokes about.

True. I saw that movie years ago, rented it actually, and it was hilarious.

SPACEBALLS, BLAZING SADDLES, YOUNG FRANKENSTEIN and HISTORY OF THE WORLD PART 1 are pretty much the peak of Mel Brooks films for me. Although DRACULA: DEAD AND LOVING IT naturally combined Brooks with Leslie Neilson, and a lot of people like ROBIN HOOD: MEN IN TIGHTS. THE PRODUCERS gets a lot of pub because of the long running Broadway musical, but compared to the above four, not as funny. Still funny, though.

The only one of his flicks I haven't seen was SILENT MOVIE.

LIFE STINKS was probably his most disappointing, only because I felt it was more of a "dramedy" than a comedy as it went along. But it had it's moments.

And Blazing Saddles, if made today would be the most protested, sued film EVER.

VERY few people realize that Richard Pryor helped Brooks write that movie, which is what makes it so amazingly funny. You can even tell which lines he wrote too.

DAMN I love that movie. Scathingly funny across all races, sexes and hell, even animals get abused to some degree. Equal opportunity bashing.

It isn't even that; a lot of movies, video games, and even cartoons have certain bits in them that in today's overly sensitive, ultra-litigeous and easily offended humor-lacking world would never make it.

Quick example; I recently watched the INSPECTOR GADGET box set from SHOUT! Factory, circa 2006, that had the first 22 episodes on it. One episode literally has Dr. Claw spike Gadget's drink before a race and they obviously make fun of DUI. Gadget even slurs some "drunk talk" and crashes the car at the end. This was 1983, from DIC, for children. There is zero chance a network cartoon for kids in 2008 would DARE even HINT at making fun of a DUI situation. Instead it would be a VERY SPECIAL EPISODE if that (and while Gadget always ended in a safety tip like most 80's shows, drinking wasn't one of the hazards mentioned. Think it was some crap about seatbelts).

(I actually didn't know Pryor helped write SADDLES. I guess I should pay more attention to the credits.)
 
DAMN I love that movie. Scathingly funny across all races, sexes and hell, even animals get abused to some degree. Equal opportunity bashing.

Not especially. The movie was like 99% criticism of white dudes with money and power. There were like, some minor shots at gay dudes and Mexicans but aside from that it was pretty on-point.
 
Not especially. The movie was like 99% criticism of white dudes with money and power. There were like, some minor shots at gay dudes and Mexicans but aside from that it was pretty on-point.

There were some jibes about some black stereotypes, least in film at the time. And c'mon! How often you hear a white character in any film call a black one the N word and it isn't some "true story about racism" sort of movie? While I agree with you, I also feel BLAZING SADDLES spread things around with some raunchy humor.

I also bought another comic on my lunch break today that I missed at my LCS; it came out about 2 weeks ago, but so what?

X-MEN: FIRST CLASS #16: And thus ends the ongoing series run for this franchise. It started as an 8 issue mini, and surprisingly, a one-shot and then this ongoing, which at 16 issues has lasted longer than quite a few more "mainstream" Marvel ongoings for the past 4-9 years. But it isn't the end for Jeff Parker and XM:FC yet. Another one-shot is due, and then another mini. Quite what advantage this strategy is supposed to have compared to another 5-6 issues of the ongoing is beyond me. If I recall my sales figures for THE BEAT correctly, the last one-shot and the new #1 really didn't boost sales beyond where they already were. Most retailers just treated it as extra issues of the core title, and they were right. Now we're in more cautious economic times where some shops may be not as willing to blindly up orders for every #1 that ships. But that never stopped the Big Two.

XM:FC is an odd duck title. It is intended to fit into the Silver Age continuity of Marvel comics, and Uncanny X-Men in particular, but often fudges that continuity. Easy examples include having the original 5 X-Men meet Man-Thing or Machine Man when both didn't debut into the 70's, when UXM was either All New or doing reprints. The continuity is basically abandoned at the drop of a hat for a plot, while other issues can clearly take place between some 60's comics. Also, considering the entire Marvel Universe from 1961 to 2008 is supposed to be under 16 years, the series inserts things that clearly didn't exist in the early 90's, such as X-Box and, in this issue, sleek modern cell phones with pictures (cells existed in the 90's, but were bulkier). Basically, is this a MARVEL ADVENTURES title, or not? It doesn't know, but it usually outsells the MA line, so Marvel takes it. And even branched off, giving Wolverine not one, but TWO FIRST CLASS titles, even if that title doesn't really suit him.

But I usually ignore all this because the title is fun. It relies too much on team-up's rather than dealing with the title characters, but team-up's happened all the time in the 60's. Amazingly, this series went over 2 years without a guest stint from Spider-Man, and even here, he really doesn't do much but appear for maybe 4 pages. The focus is on Iceman and Human Torch, feeling they are both kindred souls (as the immature "brat" member of their teams, out for glory and laughs), uniting as a sort of Dynamic Duo. They meet when they stop some armored thieves and then end up taking a mission from Spider-Man by fighting Beetle and Scorpion (with Beetle in his vintage whielding mask costume). The action is light and fluffy and the banter between Bobby and Johnny shallow and entertaining. It's 80's Saturday Morning fare, but every now and then, that's alright.

Scherberger does the pencils and his style is very kinetic for young superheroes. I wouldn't mind seeing him do some other young hero books that actually matter.

I passed up PUNISHER WAR JOURNAL in the shop and wouldn't budge on skipping it. The difference between the two books amounted to this; while I would read both and then immediately forget about them, XM:FC was at least more amusing, light, and better drawn. I'll likely get the other material, although I don't see why they couldn't either leave it an ongoing or pull the plug. It seems like a wishy washy move. Like when sports teams make a coach a lame duck with a 1-2 year deal with a buy-out or something instead of just giving a confidence-boosting 3-4 year deal or outright sacking 'em.
 
There were some jibes about some black stereotypes, least in film at the time.

Yeah, but it was making fun of the stereotypes, not the people. Like the white women line; the punchline wasn't "Ha ha black people all want to **** white women," it was "Ha ha ignorant people stereotype black people as all wanting to **** white women."

I dunno, I just think it's a point worth making in that what one of the things that was so cutting about Saddles was how it was so unabashed about making black people the heroes / depicting white people as *******s.

I also bought another comic on my lunch break today that I missed at my LCS; it came out about 2 weeks ago, but so what?

It was kind of a **** week all around; those are usually the time to catch up on what you missed 2/3 weeks ago.
 
Yeah, but it was making fun of the stereotypes, not the people. Like the white women line; the punchline wasn't "Ha ha black people all want to **** white women," it was "Ha ha ignorant people stereotype black people as all wanting to **** white women."

I dunno, I just think it's a point worth making in that what one of the things that was so cutting about Saddles was how it was so unabashed about making black people the heroes / depicting white people as *******s.

Fair enough.

It was kind of a **** week all around; those are usually the time to catch up on what you missed 2/3 weeks ago.
Yeah.
 
Yeah, but it was making fun of the stereotypes, not the people. Like the white women line; the punchline wasn't "Ha ha black people all want to **** white women," it was "Ha ha ignorant people stereotype black people as all wanting to **** white women."

I dunno, I just think it's a point worth making in that what one of the things that was so cutting about Saddles was how it was so unabashed about making black people the heroes / depicting white people as *******s.

Exactly on point. :up:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"