Burma and Darfur - the REAL wars on terror

kainedamo

Superhero
Joined
Sep 11, 2001
Messages
9,713
Reaction score
0
Points
31
So I was watching the news about the crap happening to the Burmese people, and I was thinking about the ongoing **** happening in Africa because of that evil nutcase Mugabee, and I was thinking... the west really has their priorities of whats important in the world screwed up.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7017496.stm

I don't know if you've een keeping up with events on Burma, but the images are quite... inspiring. Thousands of monks, marching side by side with the people, because they're fed up of their undemocratic government. We're talking about a government that doesn't even want their media to show that there are protests, a government that will order it's soldiers to fire their guns at crowds of peaceful protestors, a government that killed thousands of student protestors a decade or so before this. The government decided that to quell these protests, they would raid monestarys, arrest hundreds of monks, beat up hundreds, and kill.

These people want to overthrow their government, but they don't have the means to do it.

And just thinking about that made me so angry that we're wasting our time in Iraq. We should never have went to Iraq. Firstly, because there never was any threat of WMDs coming from Iraq. Secondly, because there wasn't really much sign that the people of Iraq wanted us there.

The people of Burma WANT the world to intervene. The people are risking life imprisonment by posting blogs and pictures of the brutality of the regime. At the moment, I don't see any sign of the west or anyone else actively interferring to help these people.

"Every civilised nation has a responsibility to stand up for people suffering under a brutal military regime like the one that has ruled Burma for too long"

US President George W Bush. Nice words. But what is he going to do about it? Probably stretched too thin because of the ridiculous war on terror.

And the Darfur crises, which has been going on for awhile now. But only recently did the UN decide they would send in small handful of peacekeepers. It's not enough.

I think situations like the ones in Burma and Darfur are far more important than the blind and ignorant war on terror. People call the Iran President evil. For what? Because he denies the holocaust? Mugabee is wreaking a holocaust as we speak, he's the one we ought to be bringing down.
 
So I was watching the news about the crap happening to the Burmese people, and I was thinking about the ongoing **** happening in Africa because of that evil nutcase Mugabee, and I was thinking... the west really has their priorities of whats important in the world screwed up.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7017496.stm

I don't know if you've een keeping up with events on Burma, but the images are quite... inspiring. Thousands of monks, marching side by side with the people, because they're fed up of their undemocratic government. We're talking about a government that doesn't even want their media to show that there are protests, a government that will order it's soldiers to fire their guns at crowds of peaceful protestors, a government that killed thousands of student protestors a decade or so before this. The government decided that to quell these protests, they would raid monestarys, arrest hundreds of monks, beat up hundreds, and kill.

These people want to overthrow their government, but they don't have the means to do it.

And just thinking about that made me so angry that we're wasting our time in Iraq. We should never have went to Iraq. Firstly, because there never was any threat of WMDs coming from Iraq. Secondly, because there wasn't really much sign that the people of Iraq wanted us there.

The people of Burma WANT the world to intervene. The people are risking life imprisonment by posting blogs and pictures of the brutality of the regime. At the moment, I don't see any sign of the west or anyone else actively interferring to help these people.

"Every civilised nation has a responsibility to stand up for people suffering under a brutal military regime like the one that has ruled Burma for too long"

US President George W Bush. Nice words. But what is he going to do about it? Probably stretched too thin because of the ridiculous war on terror.

And the Darfur crises, which has been going on for awhile now. But only recently did the UN decide they would send in small handful of peacekeepers. It's not enough.

I think situations like the ones in Burma and Darfur are far more important than the blind and ignorant war on terror. People call the Iran President evil. For what? Because he denies the holocaust? Mugabee is wreaking a holocaust as we speak, he's the one we ought to be bringing down.

The problem is, Bush couldn't do anything in terms of Burma even if he wouldn't be at bound in Irak and Afghanistan. Burma is an ally of China and Bush could never risk a conflict with China.
 
It's all about whats convenient really, isn't it?

It was convenient to go to war in Iraq because let's face it, they were never gonna put up much of a fight.

But they won't go anywhere near Burma for the fear of pissing off China.
 
It's all about whats convenient really, isn't it?

It was convenient to go to war in Iraq because let's face it, they were never gonna put up much of a fight.

But they won't go anywhere near Burma for the fear of pissing off China.

how long did it take you to figure that one out?
 
Round about the time alot of Americans were like, "those Iraqis have WMDs let's go to WAR! HOO RA!"
 
It's all about whats convenient really, isn't it?

It was convenient to go to war in Iraq because let's face it, they were never gonna put up much of a fight.

But they won't go anywhere near Burma for the fear of pissing off China.
Hey, you just discovered the problem of being human. :oldrazz:
 
It's all about whats convenient really, isn't it?

It was convenient to go to war in Iraq because let's face it, they were never gonna put up much of a fight.

But they won't go anywhere near Burma for the fear of pissing off China.
I'm not so sure about that. Their was nothing (heh heh) convenient about Iraq as we can all plainly see by now. It would've been nice, but there isn't.

We went into Iraq because of oil and the interest(s) of the administration. The whole WMDs and Saddam was after the fact. They already had their hearts set on Iraq and were willing to manipulate facts and logic to fit that.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
201,164
Messages
21,908,476
Members
45,703
Latest member
BMD
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"