BvS BvS: Early Tweet Discussion Thread (NO SPOILERS) - Part 1

Status
Not open for further replies.
Inb4 BvS haters say the Critics Choice score isn't valid because there's a 10/10 in there that shouldn't have been a 10. :o
 
Alright fellas, what's the update on the early reactions now? I know some had an early viewing of the film last night, but I was watching Daredevil so wasn't keeping up with this thread.

Pretty positive. Some critics scores got out but looks like WB got to them. They both gave it 90 and 100 out of a 100 respectively but the last guy said he did it as a joke and couldn't remove it. But it seems like backtracking to most folks.
 
I don't think he was joking, kinda of a coincidence that he posts a review the same time the other person did.
 
Is it possible all the early positive buzz is an ongoing inside joke by people who have seen the movie because they know it's Fant4stic bad?
 
I don't think he was joking, kinda of a coincidence that he posts a review the same time the other person did.

I think he got asked if he was supposed to put that review score up so early, so it looks like he's backtracking.
 
Is it possible all the early positive buzz is an ongoing inside joke by people who have seen the movie because they know it's Fant4stic bad?

We've had positive reactions from all sorts of people from all over the world you telling me they all seemingly got to together and decided to create positive buzz just for the lulz? Bah.
 
Tune into our live blog of the #BatmanvSuperman* press conference at 10 a.m. Pacific Time bit.ly/1XAtWPg
 
Uh oh

https://***********/edouglasww/status/710854451796508672

@mjsamps @devincf LOL! I was rating movies on the BFCA site this morning and I put in 10/10 for BvS as a joke...and then couldn't remove it
My morning's off to a fun start. I jump into this thread to catch up on reactions, posts and posts about the one 100 given to the film. Much excitement.

Fast-forward a bit and it turns out it was a stupid joke. Cue angry backlash.

:funny:
 
Does did stuff ever happen to any other movie ? Lol......

I hope hes joking about that....but why would he just mention it now when someone brought it up to his attention? He could of just said that was a mistake i apologize right after he made that score....

Maybe wb got to him and that other person who made the scores so he had to come up with an excuse...idk who to believe anymore lol
 
at least a high score for a joke is better than a low score for a joke, anyway...
 
I don't think the woman that gave it a 90/100 is one that would do it as a joke. I think we are in for a great film.
 
He's lying, he's trying to cover his ass because he broke embargo. You really think that you can't change a score you posted yourself?
 
He's lying, he's trying to cover his ass because he broke embargo. You really think that you can't change a score you posted yourself?

I actually don't think you can change a score once you've submitted it. It's more credible that way.
 
I actually don't think you can change a score once you've submitted it. It's more credible that way.

So went to the movie page, gave it a 10 out of 10 and submitted it as a joke? Lol :whatever:
 
I actually don't think you can change a score once you've submitted it. It's more credible that way.

No but the web site could...
 
So went to the movie page, gave it a 10 out of 10 and submitted it as a joke? Lol :whatever:

I'm not justifying his actions, I'm just assuming the functionality of the site.
 
I don't think the woman that gave it a 90/100 is one that would do it as a joke. I think we are in for a great film.

Yeah. WB have literally told them no reactions or reviews - even if they're good - till after the embargo has been lifted.
 
I don't think the woman that gave it a 90/100 is one that would do it as a joke. I think we are in for a great film.

Thats what im saying too... the girl did it as a joke as well???
I guess this is the internet...everyone puts a negative spin on things.... even if its true he was joking....how does anybody see his view of the movie as a negative???
 
I'm not justifying his actions, I'm just assuming the functionality of the site.

Doesn't it strain credulity a little to think that a professional critic with a whole bunch of ratings on that site wouldn't know if an entered rating can't be edited?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"