This makes such little sense. What do you think the habit of reading reviews revolves around. Folks go to their critics of choice precisely because of their standards, and because they manage to make you understand them, regardless of whether or not you share them. The act of agreeing or not exists outside of that. There is no reason for anyone, professional critics included, to approve/disapprove of anything other than how it adjusts to their personal opinion. What exactly would you be listening to, then? Maybe you meant to phrase that differently?