lujho
Superhero
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2003
- Messages
- 5,409
- Reaction score
- 72
- Points
- 73
None the less Catwoman was ruined and I can't forgive him for it. Grr.
Okay... I'm pretty sure I know wwhat the answer is, but... why is that then?
None the less Catwoman was ruined and I can't forgive him for it. Grr.
Cause there's no way you could put protections that big, that thick, under a cloth costume and have a nice-looking Batman.Not neccessarily. Would the TDK suit look good under cloth? No, it would look crap, it would be all lumpy. It wasn't designed to go under a suit.
Would the Begins suit look better? Maybe - it's more organic, but then again it also wasn't designed to go under anything, the buckling issues that occur in the Begins suit would look even worse under cloth.
But a suit of similar size and thickness that was actually designed to look good under cloth would be perfectly possible - it just needs a good clean shape, and needs to have separate elements where needed so that it doesn't buckle anywhere.
Such a suit would be hardly any different to the padding on the Spidey suits or other cloth-based suits - it would just be a different shape (slightly less natural) and it would exist in-movie.
Any cloth-based suit needs padding anyway because they tend to make the actor look thinner - you just need to re-purpose that padding as in-movie protection.
Not neccessarily. Would the TDK suit look good under cloth? No, it would look crap, it would be all lumpy. It wasn't designed to go under a suit.
Would the Begins suit look better. Maybe it's more organic, but then again it also wasn't designed to go under anything, the buckling issues that occur in the Begins suit would look even worse under cloth.
But a suit of similar size and thickness that was actually designed to look good under cloth would be perfectly possible - it just needs a good clean shape, and needs to have separate elements where needed so that it doesn't buckle anywhere.
Such a suit would be hardly any different to the padding on the Spidey suits or other cloth-based suits - it would just be a different shape (slightly less natural) and it would exist in-movie.
Any cloth-based suit needs padding anyway because they tend to make the actor look thinner - you just need to re-purpose that padding as in-movie protection.
I usually wouldn't blame crappy pics on bad lighting, but that's really what is going on here. The cowl has lost all of it's hard lines in that shot.
I personally laugh everytime Michael Keaton stops the Joker's bullet with that silver plate in Vicky Vale's apartment. Realistically there would be a big hole in that plate. And in him, too.

People need to stop defending Bale's size. There's no excuse for it. Batman is one of the few super heroes whose strength is pretty much dependent on how he looks. It's not feasible for a lean human to do the things Batman does. And Batman needs to look physically intimidated, if only to psych criminals out of attacking him.
That's the thing about a lot of the heroes, I think the actors don't quite fit the bill physically, they might facially though. And don't tell me good actors with good heights.
And the suit also sucks. Batman IS a comic book hero, no matter how much of a realist Nolan wants to be. The audience CAN suspend themselves in belief as to him getting the same amount of protection from the bulky suit as a thinner, more organic suit like the one in the comics. They even dropped the ball with the symbol. That's one of the most important parts of the suit. I want to see it clearly and know it's Batman, and not some chump in a black suit.
except for the fact tthat there is a whole unspent bullet in the tray when vicky examines it later![]()
I mean, seriously, this thread is ridiculous.
It goes like this:
Poster A: "I think the Batsuit should look like this!"
Poster B: "OMGSTFUn00b u aren't teh l33t! OMG! Not comic faithful!"
Poster C: "But teh REAlISm!!!!!!11
Then, you multiply A * B * C, and so you end up with D.
If D is more provocative, then Regwic comes in and says:
Regwic: "I mock you! Your claim deserves serious refetation, and you are incorrect! Sorry!"
And someone like Saint will come in and post some manip that looks like pajams, and say:
"Batman needs to look like this becase:
- I'm right
- I'm Right
- I'm Right
- You're wrong
"
And then someone like Mr. Superhero will come along, and it's the same scenario all over again!
Seriously, this thread makes me laugh uproariously! I laugh at all the people who spend countless hours debating something that is so trivial, to minute, so meaningless to the rest of the general population in society that it really doesn't matter whose mini-essay is constructed with more persuasion because, at the end of the day, people get on with their lives.
WUH-ho0o0o0o0o!!!!!!!
Who are you guys trying to kid?
You guys go back and forth, and forth and back, and verbally *********e until until the proverbial cows come home.
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaannnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnddddddddd, with that said, keeep arguing, LL.
No ... just ... no.
Sorry.
![]()
For those UFC fans out there just watch George St. Peirre fight and case closed. He is lean, very agile and has great technique as a fighter...he will knock you out.
I mean, seriously, this thread is ridiculous..
It could work, I guess. I just want some spandex, foo's. Can't a brotha' get some spandex?
Chrome? Chrome?
I especially enjoy the "His legs are segmented for movement" argument. If it was for movement, the legs would be segmented at joints, areas of stress or buckling, and that's it. Adding a bunch of random lines won't make it any more mobile than that: it's just useless visual garbage, as I've said in the past. The same goes for the v-plate. No purpose, just ugly.
Even though we cant judge yet, i am really concerned that the TDK suit will give Batman a more stealthy, ninja type appearence.
I'm pretty sure that the Joker used a Dillinger in that scene, a very weak weapon. I could see that actually working.
except for the fact tthat there is a whole unspent bullet in the tray when vicky examines it later![]()
I was always more bothered by how quickly she lost interest in where he went. He obviously had to go out a window or something, there's only one door in an apartment, possibly a patio door. You'd think she would want to A; make sure he isn't injured at all, and B; ask him how the hell he managed to pull that stunt off and disappear into thin air. Instead she's like oh well, Bruce is gone now... OH LOOK, it's a pretty box!
I especially enjoy the "His legs are segmented for movement" argument. If it was for movement, the legs would be segmented at joints, areas of stress or buckling, and that's it. Adding a bunch of random lines won't make it any more mobile than that: it's just useless visual garbage, as I've said in the past. The same goes for the v-plate. No purpose, just ugly.
Look
![]()
It's the same nose on both cowls, it's just the angle. The nose bugs me a lot in that pic from Begins, but as many times as I've seen the movie I never really noticed it until I started see that pic on this board.
eh.....I like the mouth opening much much better in this picture. I wonder why they changed it? Probably b/c Bale doesn't have as full of a face this go round.
eh.....