Paste Pot Pete
No, I build a rocket.
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2006
- Messages
- 4,064
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Batman: "Was it me, or did we have a moment back there?"
That's a bit ridiculous. If the production crew takes the time to shape the cape to their liking for the iconic shots, it's not implausible to think they'd do the same for the more quieter moments as well.so Batman should stop what he's doing and fix his cape so it looks perfect because he's in an iconic moment?
so Batman should stop what he's doing and fix his cape so it looks perfect because he's in an iconic moment?
I think the suit is very well suited for the Nolan universe yet their are some problems with it. My main one being the size of the mouth hole which I'm sure is soon going to take over the whole of his face until we have a completely black faced batman in like Batman of the Future.
as has been said before. Bale does not have the proper jaw structure for a accurate mouth hole on the cowl, there have been manipped pics of bales batman with a proper mouth hole and it does not look right.
) jaw structure were Kilmer and Clooney.
Clooney's chin has the bone structure, but i didnt like him under the cowl. I didnt like him as BW, nor as batman. Acting aside, he didnt look right to me. Plus he was too well known when he put the cowl on, so you would instantly say, what the hell is clooney doing there?Interestingly, the only Batman actors who have had a good (almost perfect in Clooney's case) jaw structure were Kilmer and Clooney.
Shame bout the acting skills then.
Although Bale looks fantastic in this shot - nothing wrong with the chin...
![]()
I think you re taking this too far with the realism.I like the smaller mouth hole, it allows him to speak, but it protects his jaw....I think thats the point, he shouldn't be running around with his jaw exposed so he can get it cut/burned or scarred....Billionaire Bruce Wayne shows up with a bunch of scars on his face, people will ask questions.
Wow you completely misinterpreted what i say. I am merely saying that if you apply your realism to a bigger extent, then batman wouldnt be having an uncoverd mouth, he would be using tasers to instantly take care of his enemies without killing them, etc.so your saying its more important that his jaw looks squared?, and wearing an Iron Man suit with fangs and fur would look ridiculous. I know its only a movie, but I like realism, I like that everything done thus far has been plausible, as opposed to babies being born to look like deformed penguins, falling from a high building and getting licked by cats giving you cat-like reflexes and abilities, having acid thrown in your face yet the scar is perfectly centered down your face, or having your hair change from long and brown to short and red everytime you put on a Riddler's suit. Comicbook Batman has a square jaw and wears spandex, you'd rather have that then a realistic looking Batman, whose jaw isn't a square as we would like?


so Batman should stop what he's doing and fix his cape so it looks perfect because he's in an iconic moment?
LOL that is actually. Something must have sold him on going in this direction, and hopefully that will be brought out in some way during the movie.I find it interesting that on the BB suit feature on the DVD they talk about the previous suits being too "industrial" and how Nolan wanted to "take it back to the organic form of the figure..."
Kind of ironic now, isn't it?
in the real world, a bank robbery like jokers could happen, but tell me what are the odds that that school bus would have actually hit the robber?
t:LOL that is actually. Something must have sold him on going in this direction, and hopefully that will be brought out in some way during the movie.
Heh.
I mean I think it's kind of weird when an argument is given by the director for doing something a specific way and then the next movie they do it different for whatever reason and come up with a completely different argument why it has to be that way now.
t: Not that I'm complaining because I love the fantasy element and if Batman had to be all plausable all the time, what would be the point of watching it? He'd just get shot with some automatic weapons and that would be that.Epic fail on their part.I find it interesting that on the BB suit feature on the DVD they talk about the previous suits being too "industrial" and how Nolan wanted to "take it back to the organic form of the figure..."
Kind of ironic now, isn't it?
Just thought I'd point that outI mean I think it's kind of weird when an argument is given by the director for doing something a specific way and then the next movie they do it different for whatever reason and come up with a completely different argument why it has to be that way now.
I bet if I re-watched some more of the featurettes I'll find quotes like "the Tumbler is the only vehicle Batman could realistically have and survive out on the streets...." or something, when now he's got the batpod- Lol. Actually listening to Nolan talk about the methodology behind their choices in BB is really interesting and confusing as well. Because he goes on about all this storytelling and realism stuff but then throws in "well with this type of movie people expect the action to be as over the top as you can make it..." and then explains basically why the action is actually going to be not realistic at allt: Not that I'm complaining because I love the fantasy element and if Batman had to be all plausable all the time, what would be the point of watching it? He'd just get shot with some automatic weapons and that would be that.
