I only like the Hu, Norton, Malkovich and Williams casting
1)Wrong. She can act. Plus, this role would be right up her alley.Kelly Hu can't act, Norton's fantastic but not right for Black Mask, Malkovich is already a DC villain, and Williams wouldn't be taken seriously. The only one of his casting I like is Nathan Jones as Bane, and that's only if he gets dubbed over.
1)Wrong. She can act. Plus, this role would be right up her alley.
2)Wrong. Because he's listed as the Riddler, not Black Mask.
3)Who cares, they wont conflict with this role.
4)Wrong. You relaly dont know enough about Williams' work if you give that statement. If he would not have been taken seriously, you could have kissed One Hour Photo and Insomnia good bye. Alas, that is not the case.
Simply put, Kelly Hu can act. She worked well with the very little she had to work with in X2, and despite being in crappy movies like Scorpion King and Cradle 2 the Grave, she was one of the few redeeming factors.
I can see Norton as Riddler or Black Mask.
As for the dual comic roles, I personally don't care as long as their different comic-verses. I don't see the problem with someone being in a Marvel and a DC movie. Berry was wrong for Catwoman and Storm, but her doing dual roles were not the movies' problems. Reynolds, who I find overrated but still enjoyable, was filler as Deadpool(a character who sucks) and while not my choice for Hal, I can see him working in the role.
And Williams can work well in these Batman movies; Especially considering he's worked with Nolan before and turned in a great, non-comedic performance.
Ryan wasnt my first or even tenth choice for Hal,but I wait in pray.
But with Norton,Ive seen enough of him to know that he would totally work as Riddler. I certainly dont have the fear of him,if he were cast,being like Frank Gorshin or Jim Carrey. He has the look and charisma of Riddler. A weak little man,with a competitive,sadistic and fiendishly intelligent mind...Norton could pull that of no problem.
Paul Bettany could do it perfectly as well. A real smug ****** just like Riddler,lol..
Honestly, after seeing Fight Club, American History X, and The Incredible Hulk, I can't imagine Edward Norton as "weak"
Ed Norton is too weedy to be Black Mask.
.
He's the perfect size for modern Black Mask. Sionis hasn't had that beefy look since like, the early 90s.
And I think a lot of people don't realize that Black Mask, despite the name, is not African American. I don't have any problem race-switching characters (the best actor should get the part, regardless of color), but it's just funny how many fancastings immediately go with black actors for Sionis.
Then Duncan's best for Tally Man.I am more than aware that Roman Sionis is a white man in the comics. The reason I see Michael Clarke Duncan in the role is purely because of his presence and voice. In the late 80's and 90's that was what the character was about. His presence was assuming. And I always pictured him with an intimidating voice. Especially with that mask, on screen the character will really have to come through in the performance of the voice. Duncan has that over almost any actor in Hollywood. The man is an Academy Award Nominee, has no opposition to comic book films, has insane presence and could be a physical threat to Batman as well as a force in the underworld.
Would I mind a Leo DiCaprio or Guy Pierce "pretty boy" Black Mask who turns sadistic and calculated? No. But I think that the performance would have to be very good to come through the mask. I have always felt that Duncan could pull that off very well, black guy or white guy, his voice, talent, presence give him the role for me.
-R
God forbid if Roman Sionis wanted to remain the public eye and was Black Mask AND MCD was playing him, even Stevie Wonder could see that Roman Sionis and Black Mask were the same person.