Ultra Lantern
In Darkest Night!
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2011
- Messages
- 5,225
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 31
Married.
You hate it because it's true....
![]()
I've always felt that Peter shouldn't be the person we relate to but rather the person we should look up to. He should be the underdog who made it, not the underdog who continues to be the underdog and can never be anything better than the underdog. That's just depression.
Not really. The spectre of Spider-Man always coming between him and anything positive means that the character can progress in no way whatsoever. He can't get a good job, can't fall in love, can't get married, can't have friends, can't join a team or six, can't walk down the street without stubbing his toe.
How can you NOT look up to a man that continues to DO THE RIGHT thing in SPITE of getting kicked in the nuts all the time...
The reason many of us like Peter Parker is because he can make the tough decisions that many of us only WISH we could do
Peter did get married... and we all know how that turned out.![]()
And you're saying he can't be depicted like that if he has a wife![]()
The ending of his marriage seemed to have less to do with his being spider-man but more to do with a completely misguided and narrow-minded editor in chief who had Peter and MJ do something completely out of character for both of them just in order to fulfill his vision of a perpetually single spider-man.![]()
No... because having a loved one that will comfort you and keep you warm at night is seldom the recipe to doing the right thing in spite of real life kicking you in the nuts. The aforementioned scenario is life handing you a bowl of cashews... so no matter how difficult your decisions as Spider-Manwill be, life will be good at home as Peter Parker.
Even if he has to make decisions that will be difficult for Peter (and his wife), he has someone at his side to comfort him throughout that difficult process.
When you're alone... those decisions are much more difficult to make... and making those tough decisions is what makes Peter that much more admirable as a person.
It boggles my mind that some of you cannot see this...
We all want Peter to be happy....
I want Peter to be happy...
I was happy that Peter was the big "ackowledged" hero during Spider-Island...
But as I stated before... that's the exception and not the norm.
Peter Parker works better as a character when he struggles to constantly do the right thing in spite of his personal dreams and delights
And that's my opinion.
![]()
My statement is not false... but I think we can all agree that the story was a result of Marvel's desire to have their flagship character back to a scenario that makes him work better in the long run.
Again, he can still be portrayed as a man who has to make the difficult decisions in life and deal with the problems, annoyances and hard luck situations that we all have to deal with if he has a wife. And it doesn't necessarily mean that life will ALWAYS be good at home for him as Peter Parker, his duties as spider-man can still cause problems with his marriage.
And being spider-man can still cause plenty of other conflicts with other aspects of his life if he's married. There have been plenty of stories over the years which have demonstrated that. Having a wife isn't necessarily going to always make those conflicts any more or less bearable.
If the "spectre of Spider-Man" keeps ruining everything good in Parker's life, wouldn't the most responsible thing be to give up being Spider-Man?
As an immature, directionless loser who's even viewed as a slacker by his Aunt May?
But you can't claim to be responsible if you aren't acting responsible towards yourself. It's not responsibility that drives Pete anymore, it's martyrdom.
The simple fact is they split them up because they had stories they couldn't tell with a married Peter. So far, that's been him getting "drunk" and banging his roommate, going on a couple of failed dates (including with Ms. Marvel), having casual sex with Black Cat (who also had decades of character development thrown out the window), and dating one of the blandest new characters ever.
Now, this is EVERYTHING that has come out of Peter being single. These are the "stories" that couldn't be told with him married. Everything Spider-Man has done, however, has no direct correlation to his life that would make a lick of difference if he was single or married. Grim Hunt could have still been done. Spider-Island could have still been done. The hundreds of forgettable filler stories between BND and now could have been done. Aunt May joining FEAST and marrying JJJS could have been done (though I rather it hadn't).
Now, were those Peter moments REALLY ones that NEEDED to be told so desperately that they had to go through OMD and BND? Have they REALLY brought something to the table that could absolutely NOT have been done with them married?
And I want an honest, objective answer to that. I don't want anti-marriage shippers to say "yes" simply because THEY hated the marriage. I want them to look at the stories AS A WHOLE, and based on their individual merits answer the question. If you look at each story individually, you come to the realization that the reasons were a load of hooey to justify the unjustifiable.