• Super Maintenance

    Xenforo Cloud upgraded our forum to XenForo version 2.3.4. This update has created styling issues to our current templates.

    Starting January 9th, site maintenance is ongoing until further notice, but please report any other issues you may experience so we can look into.

    We apologize for the inconvenience.

CBS, WB give CW a vote of confidence

TMC1982

Sidekick
Joined
Mar 22, 2008
Messages
1,403
Reaction score
0
Points
31
CW Parents Emphasize Support of Network
By Josef Adalian

As the CW prepares for next month's launch of its super-hyped drama
"90210," the leaders of parent companies CBS Corp. and Warner Bros.
are offering an emphatic vote of confidence in the network.

In a letter to CW employees and affiliates delivered this morning, the
executives—Barry Meyer and Bruce Rosenblum of Warner Bros. and Leslie
Moonves and Nancy Tellem of CBS—acknowledge that building a network is
"a difficult proposition" but state flatly that they "are dedicated to
the CW" and that they "stand squarely behind you, and are committed to
doing what is necessary to ensure the success of the CW venture."


"We support the network, believe in it, and are committed to its
future," the executives add later in the letter, a copy of which was
obtained by TelevisionWeek. "All of us must continue to work hard and
push everyday to aggressively compete in this marketplace. Our success
will be born of focused and sustained effort over the course of the
next few years."

The letter also makes it clear that the CW is a part of both CBS's and
Warner Bros.' business strategies.


"CBS and Warner Bros., through the CW, are collaborating to create
valuable content assets and build a network that benefits all our
business partners and our respective corporate entities," the
executives wrote.

The letter comes just a few weeks after Ms. Tellem and Mr. Rosenblum
made an unannounced visit to a meeting of the CW's current programming
department. The pop-in was meant to convey the message that CBS and
Warner Bros. were on the same page when it came to the network. The
missive seems designed to underscore that message and eliminate any
talk that CBS and Warner Bros. might have divergent interests.

In May, the Wall Street Journal reported that one of the partners in
the CW might abandon the network next year if ratings didn't improve.
Like most of the networks, the CW was hit hard by last year's writers
strike and saw its ratings among adults 18-49 drop by about 15 percent
last season.

Despite developing some of the most buzzed-about shows of recent years
—"Gossip Girl," "90210," "Aliens in America"—the CW has struggled to
get the attention of its core audience of younger viewers. The Sept. 1
relaunch of "Gossip Girl" and the Sept. 2 premiere of "90210" will be
critical indicators of how tough the upcoming season will be.

In their letter, the four executives—all of whom sit on the CW's board
of directors—went out of their way to point out the CW's
accomplishments and to thank staffers for their work.

"We presented Madison Avenue with 'Content Wraps" and "Quickies',"
they wrote, pointing out advertising formats the network introduced.
"We up-ended the American pop culture with the creation of 'Gossip
Girl'. Now, The CW has created '90210,' the most anticipated and
buzzed-about show of the new television season," the letter states.

"All of this has been supported by the most innovative and talked-
about marketing campaigns in recent memory, and along the way we have
been embraced by every important constituency from advertisers to
affiliates and even the press," the letter said.

The full text of the letter follows:

To Our CW Colleagues:

As summer draws to a close with the network on the eve of the 2008
fall launch, we want to take a moment to thank each and every one of
you for all your hard work and dedication.

We recognize that creating any new business is a difficult
proposition, and building a new broadcast network is no exception!

As we move forward into the new season, please know that CBS and
Warner Bros., are dedicated to the CW. We stand squarely behind you,
and are committed to doing what is necessary to ensure the success of
the CW venture.

During the last two years all of us have worked very hard to create
and build the CW. In that time we have had numerous successes: We
presented Madison Avenue with "Content Wraps" and "Quickies". We up-
ended the American pop culture with the creation of "Gossip Girl".
Now, The CW has created "90210," the most anticipated and buzzed-about
show of the new television season.

All of this has been supported by the most innovative and talked-about
marketing campaigns in recent memory, and along the way we have been
embraced by every important constituency from advertisers to
affiliates and even the press.

CBS and Warner Bros., through the CW, are collaborating to create
valuable content assets and build a network that benefits all our
business partners and our respective corporate entities.

For those of you who were not in the recent CW current meeting with
Nancy and Bruce, please let us state again: We support the network,
believe in it, and are committed to its future. All of us must
continue to work hard and push everyday to aggressively compete in
this marketplace. Our success will be born of focused and sustained
effort over the course of the next few years.

We thank you again, and please take a moment to appreciate the talents
and accomplishments of every individual in every department at The CW.
Best of luck to us all in the 2008-09 season!

Sincerely,
Barry Meyer
Leslie Moonves
Bruce Rosenblum
Nancy Tellem

In a nutshell this is what's wrong with the CW in my estimation:
*Letting Dawn Ostroff run the network into the ground. Ms. Ostroff used to work at Lifetime before coming over to UPN. This shows, in how she now desires the CW to be the network for the young female demographic. But what Dawn Ostroff doesn't seem to fully realize that when you're running what's supposed to be a major broadcast TV network (to compete with CBS, ABC, NBC and FOX), you have to cater as to as many demographics as possible (rather than one particular niche market that you would expect from cable).

*Turning their backs on the urban demographic, when UPN and WB had in the past, courted them when the other networks wouldn't. They cancelled "Girlfriends", "All of Us", "One on One", and moved "Everybody Hates Chris" all over the schedule with virtually little advertising.

*Poorly advertising shows that have or had a loyal following like
"Supernatural" and "Veronica Mars".

*Putting all of their eggs in the "Gossip Girl"/"America's Next Top Model" basket. Just look at the CW's upcoming fall schedule. There's virtually little variety or diversity. All of the most hyped shows (e.g. "90210", "Privileged", etc.) fall into the "rich, pretty white kids" category.

*Dumping "SmackDown!" (for the sake of attracting more young female viewers) even though it was the highest rated show on the network, and got respectable ratings in what's otherwise considered the "Friday Night Death Slot".

*Cancelling "Everwood" in favor of an 11th season of "7th Heaven" just so that particular show can get cancelled again. Dawn Ostroff's logic for bringing "7th Heaven" back for one more year was because it simply got high ratings for its series finale on the WB.

*Pulling "Reba" off of the air even though it was the highest rated sitcom on the WB at the time that it shut down. Just like with "SmackDown!", Dawn Ostroff cited that the show didn't fit in with the CW's newly desired target demographic.
 
I dont think the heads of WB and CBS realize the damage Dawn Ostroff is doing to CW with her arrogant way of thinking. She doesn't deserve a vote of confidence, she should be fired. A Lifetime Lite like she's planning can't compete with heavyweight networks. She isn't building a network, she's destroying it. Her vision for CW won't even be strong enough to compete with ION or even MY Network TV.

I have to agree dropping the urban comedies, the cult shows like Supernatural and WWE from the programming block for soaps like 90210 and Gossip Girl is a boneheaded move. Teen shows and Primetime soaps tend to lose their audience very quickly; in four years no one remembers them.

The key to a good network is diversity and consistency. FOX and The WB courted urban (Black) audiences during their push to expand their audiences. WB started getting strong with solid performing cult shows like Buffy The Vampire Slayer; and sitcoms like Reba and family shows like 7th Heaven. Not teen shows like Dawson's Creek and felicitywhich faded fast after big ratings. UPN courted African-Americans and Sci-Fi fans in the beginning.

If I were running CW I would focus on getting a Gotham City Show to replace Smallville or a "Justice" Show featuring Green Arrow, Aquaman, Cyborg Black Canary and Impulse.
I'd bring TNA into primetime to compete with SD! Some new urban comedies and maybe a Flash Animated Series. Mix it up so there's something for everyone.
 
Dawn Ostroff really is destroying it. What she wants The CW to be just cannot compete with the other big networks. Her last huge mistake was dropping WWE Smackdown. The show was CW's highest rated show, and she canceled it for no other reason than it didn't appeal to 18-25 female audience. Good logic there. Last time I checked, you should cancel a show because of it's low ratings, not because of who it appeals to. High ratings equals an automatic win. She may just run The CW into the dirt, which makes the merger of UPN and the WB all in vain.
 
What I don't get is CW giving Ostroff a vote of confidence after cancelling SD! and Reba the two highest rated shows on the network, not Developing a Smallville replacement and outsoucing its Sunday night-line up to Media Rights Capital. Those are grounds for dismissal IMO.


Somebody needs to give Dawn Ostroff a Memo: LIFETIME DOESN'T WORK FOR LIFETIME. That network is the last stop for washed up actresses who can'tfind any work outside of corny "women in peril" movies or cheesy soaps like Army Wives so awful you can't help but laugh at them. Everyone makes fun of it fom MadTv to Chappelle to an internet comic strip like Something Positive. I doubt a joke is what CBS and Warner want in buildiing a serious network to compete with FOX or ABC.

TPTB at CBS and warner bros need to understand Rich white girls weren't watching CW, WB, or UPN. They never were and nevere will. It was Blacks, Comic fans and Scifi fans and a host of cult audiences that came together to form a core audience for those networks. Diversity made them and homoogeny is breaking them.
 
What I don't get is CW giving Ostroff a vote of confidence after cancelling SD! and Reba the two highest rated shows on the network, not Developing a Smallville replacement and outsoucing its Sunday night-line up to Media Rights Capital. Those are grounds for dismissal IMO.


Somebody needs to give Dawn Ostroff a Memo: LIFETIME DOESN'T WORK FOR LIFETIME. That network is the last stop for washed up actresses who can'tfind any work outside of corny "women in peril" movies or cheesy soaps like Army Wives so awful you can't help but laugh at them. Everyone makes fun of it fom MadTv to Chappelle to an internet comic strip like Something Positive. I doubt a joke is what CBS and Warner want in buildiing a serious network to compete with FOX or ABC.

TPTB at CBS and warner bros need to understand Rich white girls weren't watching CW, WB, or UPN. They never were and nevere will. It was Blacks, Comic fans and Scifi fans and a host of cult audiences that came together to form a core audience for those networks. Diversity made them and homoogeny is breaking them.
 
I'll watch Reaper and 90210 on CW, but besides that there is absolutely nothing on the network that interest me. When they were seperate networks there was far more to watch on both networks.
 
I watch the CW solely for Reaper. F*** everything else, the network is trash.

To be fair, I felt the same way about the WB before the merge, and the only thing I watched on UPN was Star Trek: Voyager (and even that got boring to me toward the end of season 5).
 
I watch Supernatural, Reaper, One Tree Hill, and Smallville (as watered down and boring as it may occasionally be now).

Honestly, the network needs to grow a pair. It's all girly shows and crap, crap, crap reality shows.
 
Only show I watched on the wb was smallvile. It got boring 3 seasons ago so I quit watching it. So no CW for me. I sort of hope the channel fails just to teach the Wb a lesson for teaming up with UPN.
 
At least Fox has Jack Bauer, Gregory House and the guys from Prison Break.

Reaper, Supernatural and Smallville are the only shows I watch and two of them could be gone in a year or so.
 
WATCH SUPERNATURAL, PEOPLE!


....*leaves*
 
I watch Supernatural, Reaper, Sophia Bush, and Smallville (as watered down and boring as it may occasionally be now).

Honestly, the network needs to grow a pair. It's all girly shows and crap, crap, crap reality shows.

That's pretty much my CW viewing list. :hehe:
 
I was excited about the show when it started. Watched three episodes then quit. The show was to pretty boyish to me.

*comes back*

You didn't give it a chance. Watch it. It's gritty. It's brilliant.

*leaves*
 
Whew. Thank goodness that guy's gone, am I right, guys? :D

*comes back again*

:cmad:

I've watched both Reaper and the goddamn Supernatural. Reaper became really repetitive REALLY fast. It's still enjoyable, but it's not something that I'd go out of my way to catch.

Supernatural, on the other hand, has provided some of the best horror fiction of the 2000s, and is easily the most slept on show on television right now. Any comic book fan or just a fan of genre television in general owes it to themselves to check it out. It's outstanding.

*leaves again*
 
Corp's right. Ackles and Padalecki can't act. They are just pretty. So yeah, I'm with on hating both leads.
 
Corp's right. Ackles and Padalecki can't act. They are just pretty. So yeah, I'm with on hating both leads.

I hate to get all defensive fanboy on you guys, but you leave me with no choice. :(

I'm assuming that your stance on their acting abilities is based on their work on the perennial Emmy favorite Smallville and the horror classic House of Wax. And while I can't deny that their individual bodies of work prior to Supernatural aren't much to take note of, their work in the series has showcased that when given the opportunity to stretch out of the cookie-cutter WB mold, the both of them have genuine acting chops.

They can act, and have proven so over the course of Supernatural's three year run. I have no way of actually making this point without throwing out the old "Actually watch the show" riff, so I don't know what to tell you other than you're missing out on good television and I hope you feel terribly shameful about it and fail to get any sleep for the next five years.

God Bless,
Cmill
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"