Christian man forced to reproduce lesbian videos

[November Rain]

This topic is a really tough call to make.

On one hand a business does have the right to refuse trade but i think that right should be based on logical reasons.

ie if you feel someone is going to do harm with a product that has been bought on your premises, or try to offend someone or is practicing something against the law with it.

however if it is just comes down to practice of something legal you don't personally believe in then i think as a human being, you should suck it up and take the moral high ground.

The problem is when two different people try to do something and it doesn't work, the easiest excuses are always the ones that get brought up first, race, sex, religion etc...

and it's really hard to make a defense case against these claims.

if there was pornography on there, then he would have his right to defend it (even though it isn't legal) but because it may be minority pornography and he's replicated normal ones before, then he might not have two legs to stand on.

true a business does have a right to not serve but i think it needs to be for a justified reason rather than a prejudice.

it's easy to see the argument from both sides of the fence, i wonder which way the case goes...

 

[jks]

It's pretty simple. Human rights >>>>>>>> religious beliefs, the way it should be. If you want to own and run a business in this country, you better be prepared to follow this country's rules, and one of those rules is you can't discriminate based on race, religion or sexuality. Clearly this guy discriminated against this woman

 

[November Rain]

oh crap they were documentaries, yeah this guy is pretty screwed, especially if records of him reproducing other hypothetically non-christian material is on record....

 

[Kritish]

If there business tells them to do it they can either refuse or do it. If they refuse, fire there asses.

 

[RAMORE]

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=50554

I don't see any other way around it than if you agree this man should be forced to reproduce something by the government- then you hate liberty.:

That's BS he shouldn't have to do that

 

[Kritish]

What about the lesbians? Shouldn't they have the right to produce there videos without being persecuted?
They have to have there videos produced too.

 

[Dope Nose]

I don't see any other way around it than if you agree this man should be forced to reproduce something by the government- then you hate liberty.:

so basically what you're saying is that if we choose to disagree with you, then we hate liberty?

surely you see the irony in condeming anyone who happens to agree with the court order while arguing freedom of choice.

 

[Kritish]

Man-Thing is a facist.

 

[Emrys]

I'll say it again if religious law trumps man made law I DEMAND my human sacrifices and the use of hard drugs in religious ceremonies! Freedom of Religion, Goddamnit!

 

[Darthphere]

This is really newsworthy?


"A man at Walgreens was forced to develop film of a Gay Birthday Party."

 

[The Incredible Hulk]

last time I checked, lesbian's money was just as green as everyone else's...

 

[Darthphere]

last time I checked, lesbian's money was just as green as everyone else's...

It smells better.

 

[Emrys]

This is really newsworthy?


"A man at Walgreens was forced to develop film of a Gay Birthday Party."

It's because of the "gay" buzzword, riles up the conspiracy theorists on the right so they can cry about the "gay agenda"

 

[Darthphere]

It's because of the "gay" buzzword, riles up the conspiracy theorists on the right so they can cry about the "gay agenda"

Must be.

 

[logansoldcigar]

They step in and tell people what to do all the time. It's called the law.

to which the reply was

The constitution (suposedly the supreme law of the land) says that is wrong.

surely, with out the goverment occasionally stepping in to tell people what to do, we would have anarchy on our hands.?
Or should I, if i so desire, be allowed to sell hard core porn outside a school? after all, by making this illegal, surely the government is interfereing in my rights as a businessman?

 

[Emrys]

Must be.

I really liked that:

"A man at Walgreens was forced to develop film of a Gay Birthday Party."

I mean imagine someone saying to you "I won't develop your film cause you're a ***"

 

[Emrys]

to which the reply was




surely, with out the goverment occasionally stepping in to tell people what to do, we would have anarchy on our hands.?
Or should I, if i so desire, be allowed to sell hard core porn outside a school? after all, by making this illegal, surely the government is interfereing in my rights as a businessman?

I think he was not talking about the law per se but about law restricting religion.

 

[Darthphere]

I really liked that:

"A man at Walgreens was forced to develop film of a Gay Birthday Party."

I mean imagine someone saying to you "I won't develop your film cause you're a ***"

Its really idiotic. I dont see how this man was "forced" to do anything.

 

[Wilhelm-Scream]

This planet sucks ass.

 

[logansoldcigar]

I'll say it again if religious law trumps man made law I DEMAND my human sacrifices and the use of hard drugs in religious ceremonies! Freedom of Religion, Goddamnit!

well, it has been succesfully argued (in the UK) that rastafarianism is a religion, enabling raggas the freedoms and protections that other religions get.

 

[Darthphere]

This planet sucks ass.

Literally or figuratively?

 

[Emrys]

This planet sucks ass.

Now don't you diss on the Planet she's a mighty fine Lady, it's not her fault that her children are a bunch of no good brats.

 

[Emrys]

well, it has been succesfully argued (in the UK) that rastafarianism is a religion, enabling raggas the freedoms and protections that other religions get.

Excellent, god imagine something like that in the US, a Ragga steeping out of the Supreme court smoking a big fat blunt and showing the Victory sign hehe the conservatives would have stroke.

Actually it always escapes me why the Homosexuals haven't created their own religion yet, there is nothing better than to use the weapons of the other side against them

 

[Darthphere]

Excellent, god imagine something like that in the US, a Ragga steeping out of the Supreme court smoking a big fat blunt and showing the Victory sign hehe the conservatives would have stroke.

Actually it always escapes me why the Homosexuals haven't created their own religion yet, there is nothing better than to use the weapons of the other side against them

Apparently they rather participate in the same religions that shun them.

 

[Emrys]

Apparently they rather participate in the same religions that shun them.

Which is a logic that, like I said in another discussion, completely escapes me.

However what I meant with my statement is the idea to declare homosexual relationships a part of their religious rituals and since some people feel religious law trumps state law it should be quite easy to claim an unlawful influence of the state towards a religion.