Cindy Sheehan has really lost her mind.

The Overlord said:
No it isn't, turn off your TV or change the channel, this woman likely isn't on TBS, quit whining about it.
Who's whining? I'm not, I was just merely pointing out that to use the standard that she is beyond reproach is just as silly as if I were to say she is invading my privacy by being on TV.

Context is not your friend.:down
 
Mr Sparkle said:
[FONT=Trebuchet MS,Bookman Old Style,Arial] The pictures displayed here, of a somewhat dejected-looking Cindy Sheehan sitting in a tent at the rally devoid of visitors (other than a few rnum=Math.round(Math.random() * 100000); document.write('');
photographers), were distributed by the Associated Press (AP) and Reuters news agencies and accompanied news reports such as the Washington Post article quoted above. (The AP caption for the first photo read: "Cindy Sheehan waits for people at her book signing near the president's ranch in Crawford, Tex., where she spoke to a crowd of about 100 people.")

A few days after the rally, as reported in Editor & Publisher, Ms. Sheehan and her publisher contended that the photographs had been taken at an inopportune time and misleadingly implied that hardly anyone purchased a copy of Not One More Mother's Child or attended the book signing event for it:
But in a statement today, Sheehan accused "right-wing" sites of "spreading a false story that nobody bought my book at Camp Casey on Saturday. That is not true, I sold all 100 copies and got writer's cramp signing them. Photos were taken of me before the people got in line to have me sign the book. We made $2000 for the peace house."

Her publisher, Arnie Kotler at Koa Books, meanwhile released a letter to her supporters, charging that "AP and Reuters posted photos — I can't imagine why — of Cindy sitting at the book table between signings, rather than while someone was at the table. And now the smear websites are circulating an article, with these photos, that Cindy gave a signing and nobody came. It's simply not true... the benefit books signing in Crawford, Texas on November 26, 2005 was well attended and a huge success."
According to a statement issued by AP, Evan Vucci, the photographer who snapped the pictures of Cindy Sheehan, avowed that the caption used by AP was an accurate reflection of what he observed while taking the photos:
Photographer Evan Vucci, queried about the incident today said that he was present at the book signing from about 10 a.m. to about 11 a.m. During that time, he said, people were coming in to have their books signed in small groups of a few at a time.

At the time the photos were taken 'maybe 5 people had come in,' Vucci says, and Sheehan was waiting for more to stop by, which they did individually as well as in very small groups. Therefore the wording of the caption is accurate in that Sheehan was waiting for people to show up at her signing.

[/FONT]

and that has absolutely nothing to do with my post. I didn't bring up the crowd or lack thereof at her book signing.
 
As long as an order received from your direct superior is not an illegal order (one that violates the law, and/or the conscience of the soldier receiving the illegal order), the soldier is required to assume that orders received are legal, and they're not obeyed at the soldier's peril.
 
Cyclops said:
That RS photo actually looks like she's trying very hard not to laugh.

You know, I don't like the Bush administration either, but please, for the love of God, could people stop blaming the Katrina and Rita disasters on them already?

Can we still blame him/his administration for putting Brownie, a man who's expreience was as the Judges and Stewards Commissioner for the International Arabian Horse Association, in charge of FEMA? It's not that Katrina and Rita happened, it's that they had somebody completely unqualified in the position to respond to them.
 
Spider-Bite said:
\

OMG. That was so ridiculous. I was talking about alternative enrgies. We cant get off of it today. It would take decades.

BUT WE NEED TO START DOING IT. We need to start working so that a couple decaded from now we don't use it anymore.

http://www.gm.com/company/onlygm/

there you go.:up:
 
Sandman138 said:
Can we still blame him/his administration for putting Brownie, a man who's expreience was as the Judges and Stewards Commissioner for the International Arabian Horse Association, in charge of FEMA? It's not that Katrina and Rita happened, it's that they had somebody completely unqualified in the position to respond to them.

Even though the tapes that FEMA released back in September of last year, and sat in news rooms across the country for about 6 months, shows Brownie literally doing a helluva job.

About a month or so ago, Brownie was on the Jerry Doyle show. Jerry apologized for bashing Brownie, and asked him if there was anything he could do different- what would it be? Brownie then said, though this isn't an exact quote, that "he should have gone on TV and told the country the truth. The truth that nothing was getting done." Instead, he kept his mouth shut and would curse, yell and cry behind semis nowhere near the camera
 
GoldenAgeHero said:
shes a protester, why would i need to educate myself on that?

You asked who she was and why people are making a big deal out of it. So I told you to educate yourself on current events, what is so hard to understand about that?
 
Man-Thing said:
Who's whining? I'm not, I was just merely pointing out that to use the standard that she is beyond reproach is just as silly as if I were to say she is invading my privacy by being on TV.

Context is not your friend.:down

Whatever, your point is invalid, you can change the channel or turn off the TV, so I don't feel for ya.
 
Man-Thing said:
and that has absolutely nothing to do with my post. I didn't bring up the crowd or lack thereof at her book signing.

actually your post was about her booksigning right?
and I posted somethign about her booksigning right?

seems to me the response is quite revelant, it's weird you missed it.
 
She wants a tombstone for her son?!!??! who'd of thunk it?
 
She doesn't want one.

Having entire parks dedicated to decaying remains is bizarre to me anyway.
 
Lurk said:
She doesn't want one.

Having entire parks dedicated to decaying remains is bizarre to me anyway.

yeah, that doesn't make sense, but then, neither do dog marriages.

what's up with that!?
 
Dog weddings make COMPLETE sense! Can't you see they're in love??

dog.wedding.ap.jpg

;)
 
Lurk said:
Dog weddings make COMPLETE sense! Can't you see they're in love??

dog.wedding.ap.jpg

;)

tis true, I let my dog-o-phobia get in the way of their canine love.:(
 
Mr Sparkle said:
tis true, I let my dog-o-phobia get in the way of their canine love.:(

heh, dog-o-phobia. was it rick santorum who equated gay sex to man-on-dog sex?
 
this ***** is not trying to stop deaths, shes trying to get publicity. there are photos that show her at anti-Vietnam rallys. shes exploiting her son's death to gain sympathy for her cause.
 
FunBobPants said:
this ***** is not trying to stop deaths, shes trying to get publicity. there are photos that show her at anti-Vietnam rallys. shes exploiting her son's death to gain sympathy for her cause.

what's her cause?
 
sinewave said:
heh, dog-o-phobia. was it rick santorum who equated gay sex to man-on-dog sex?

not sure, but if anyone was to say that.
 
Man-Thing said:

that's nothing but sugar coating a bad circumstance. they know oil is pushing voters to the left and they want to minimize that by as much as possible.

you coud bulid vehicles right now out of different materials that would make the vehicle 50% cheaper to produce, twice as strong, and uses 4 times less energy and can run on electricity.

if they wanted to help they would make those vehicles. business take into account how much money they will make. they make more profit their way. that's why we need economic intervention to make things happen in this country.
 
FunBobPants said:
this ***** is not trying to stop deaths, shes trying to get publicity. there are photos that show her at anti-Vietnam rallys. shes exploiting her son's death to gain sympathy for her cause.

But purposly trying to get arrested, beleiving that she deserved more attention than New Orleans when the hurricanes hit and exploiting other fallen soldiers when the familes asked her not too makes her a complete attention ****e. If she didn't do such stunts, yes me, and many others would sympathise with her.
 
I've got no qualms with people calling her an attention ****e, but to insult the way she chooses to mourn her son (ie: no tombstone) is shameful.
 
Sandman138 said:
I've got no qualms with people calling her an attention ****e, but to insult the way she chooses to mourn her son (ie: no tombstone) is shameful.

I won't bash her for that, that's the way she want's to mourn, so be it.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,304
Messages
22,082,630
Members
45,882
Latest member
Charles Xavier
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"