Clash of the Titans Remake

Rate the Movie

  • 10 - By the Gods, I Decree This Awesome!

  • 9

  • 8

  • 7

  • 6

  • 5

  • 4

  • 3

  • 2

  • 1 - Epic Fail of the Titans


Results are only viewable after voting.
Weren't the other Harry Potter movies released in 3D?

No, not exactly. The fifth and sixth movies had select scenes converted into IMAX 3D (not Real-D 3D); the regular theatrical showings were in 2-D. My guessing is that WB's press releases will indicate that "Clash" and "Deathly Hallows" will be available in theaters, IMAX 3D and Real-D 3D.

Just like Disney's "Christmas Carol" and "Alice in Wonderland" releases will be.
 
I'm not too thrilled with the 3D news, but if it's supposedly used well I'll check it out. Hopefully we all won't be paying $14 with each new blockbuster.:dry:
 
I'm not too thrilled with the 3D news, but if it's supposedly used well I'll check it out. Hopefully we all won't be paying $14 with each new blockbuster.:dry:
dont come out of the theater angry that everything jumped out and was like a cheap gimmick. because the director in the interview already explained this.

this wont be like Avatar or Tron.
 
dont come out of the theater angry that everything jumped out and was like a cheap gimmick. because the director in the interview already explained this.

this wont be like Avatar or Tron.

Hey, what's wrong with being entertained?:o

But yeah, this has just been converted, anyone who expects it to be up to par with Avatar and Tron should get their head examined.
 
the more expensive the ticket will be the less movies i will watch. if Hollywood thinks that they can force on me bad movies with higher tickets then they are wrong.
 
First of all...YES...all action, sci fi etc movies will eventually be 3D in order to charge more for tickets. I cant imagine any need to make romantic comedies 3D...so either they will lag behind as the public gobbles more and more 3D films up...or (more likely) the public will tire of the gimmick and 3D movies will start losing lots of cash while cheaper films become blockbusters.

This is certainly a method of eventually getting us to shell out 15 bucks fr every movie ticket we buy though..

I really dont like the 3D nonsense...I dont need it to be sucked into the film, and the glasses annoy me more than anything. People are going to expect Avatar like results...and even with the new technology, most films will pale in comparison.
 
the more expensive the ticket will be the less movies i will watch. if Hollywood thinks that they can force on me bad movies with higher tickets then they are wrong.

Very true. I doubt I'll see Alice in Wonderland unless I catch a matinee showing with friends; the effects looked so bland and...flat. I'm not sure whether they filmed it with 3D cameras or converted it during post-production, but it looks unimpressive, regardless.
 
I doubt I'll see Alice in Wonderland because I have no desire to see the scary tranny clown I see in all the trailers.
 
I doubt I'll see Alice in Wonderland because I have no desire to see the scary tranny clown I see in all the trailers.

I personally think that the idea of a sequel to the original story is incredibly stupid. The only reasons I'd buy a ticket are for Alan Rickman's character or the Chesire Cat. I may be in the minority, but the effects aren't too impressive.
 
Ugg darn 3D! So not necessary.

Has an IMAX release been announced? Its WB so I just figured they would.
 
I saw the trailer at the theatre the other day. It looked awesome. I really don't think it needs 3D at all.
 
Are you guys not happy with this film being in 3D because it is converted in 3D rather than being filmed in 3D? Like Warner Brothers are only doing the conversion because of Avatar's success?
 
I personally think that the idea of a sequel to the original story is incredibly stupid. The only reasons I'd buy a ticket are for Alan Rickman's character or the Chesire Cat. I may be in the minority, but the effects aren't too impressive.

AIW's 3-D looks like it's going to be very gimmicky. If 3-D is the wave of the future, I hope directors figure out a natural way to utilize it instead of just throwing things at the camera.
 
Last summer, MTV News brought you the first-ever peek at the big budget remake of "Clash of the Titans" when we visited the Wales set, checking out epic battle scenes, CGI setups and star Sam Worthington in armor and a leather skirt. As we enter the new year, director Louis Leterrier is still hard at work on the project, a reimagining of the 1981 original loosely based on the Greek legend of Perseus and filled with gods, monsters and sword fights. And we couldn't be more juiced about what he's throwing together.

The French-born Leterrier, who also directed "The Incredible Hulk," called MTV earlier in the month to give us an update about the progress of his upcoming film, due out in March, some creatures we should be especially excited about and what other creations have influenced him along the way.

MTV: Where are you at in the production right now?

Louis Leterrier: We are reshooting ... we are juggling chain saws on this one. It's exciting. We were shooting the movie while we were prepping. We were shooting and posting at the same time. It's such an enormous movie with tons of visual effects, so we have to do everything at once. It's not only the number, it's the size of the visual effects. Our Kraken [sea monster] — he's not a small or medium Kraken, he's the biggest Kraken ever! We have water, boats, interactive people, everything. I don't want to do this on every movie, but I got used to shooting, posting, writing, rehearsing actors, writing the music all at the same. I never stop. I work 20 hours a day, seven days a week and it's fantastic.

MTV: Relative to "Hulk," which was a big movie, has this been an even bigger challenge?

Leterrier: "Hulk" is the story of one guy running away from two other guys and he's in love with one girl and he turns into one monster. That's it. Here I've got, like, 20 monsters, crowds of thousands — it's "Ben-Hur" with monsters. Everything becomes extremely complicated. Not to mention the complexity I added on in the beginning. I wanted to shoot in real places, not against a green screen. We moved 800 people to a small island called Tenerife, which is south of Morocco, flew helicopters and cranes all over, then went to Wales, went back to London, a crew went to Ethiopia. We were shooting all over the world. It made it very complicated, but when the dailies were coming in, it was amazing. It's because we went to the right places.

MTV: From the trailers, it seems like there are some epic set pieces. Do you have a favorite?

Leterrier: I don't like to have a set piece, then you start to tell a little bit of the story, and then you go on. I try to mix everything up. You have some exposition while you are running away from a monster and then you go to another thing. Then you stop, and when you think you're gonna rest, you get attacked by another monster. It's fun. You keep the audience surprised all the time. I'm surprised all the time as the director. When you get such a great cast of actors and you have so many people interacting together, you just get magic on the screen.

MTV: What about the tone? Is it light and fun or does it have some grit to it?

Leterrier: It's fun and light. I don't like those clean movies. We were looking at "Gladiator," we were looking at "Braveheart," "Saving Private Ryan." I was looking at those movies more than I was looking at "Troy." I was looking at grittier, dirty movies, which for me, and maybe just me, they feel more real. I know that Maximus [in "Gladiator"] is suffering because it's cold at the beginning and then it's so hot and he's in pain. These are the movies I love and that's what I tried to do. You see the people suffering, they get wounded, they stop and eat, they are exhausted, they have to rest because they won't be able to go on. It's real stuff.

MTV: Do you have a favorite monster?

Leterrier: I love the Kraken. It took so long to design the Kraken because we wanted to pay homage to the original movie, but at the same time I wanted something so huge, so massive, so unlike anything you've ever seen and also something that could move and interact and have a destruction pattern that was different than anything before. The scorpions and the harpies are amazing. We have new creatures that are like alerted humans — lots of prosthetics in our movie. Connor Sullivan, who did "The Dark Knight" — he's the guy who designed Two-Face — he did an amazing job on the Acrisius character played by Jason Flemyng. Lindy Hemming, who did the suits in "Dark Knight," she did our suits. I'm really proud of the design of this movie.

MTV: Do you know what the rating is going to be?

Leterrier: Triple X! No, PG-13. Because the blood of the monster is black, so it's fine. I can get away with it. I'm smart that way! No, it's such a big movie, and also a fun movie, but it looks gritty. It's hard PG-13.

MTV: With the movie coming out in March, do you know what's coming down the line for you in 2010?

Leterrier: So far, it's all about "Clash." I'm not the kind of guy who can do two movies at once. I love to just throw myself body and soul into one project. With "Clash," we are coming to the end, so I am starting to poke my head out of the water and see what's out there. But in terms of what I'd love to do, I'm not there.

http://www.mtv.com/movies/news/articles/1630125/story.jhtml
 
Nice interview.

Can't wait to see the Kraken in all his glory.
 
im watching it in 2D... they can waste their money on conversion to 3D rather than marketing if they wish.
 
Are you guys not happy with this film being in 3D because it is converted in 3D rather than being filmed in 3D? Like Warner Brothers are only doing the conversion because of Avatar's success?
Precisely.

I refuse to pay for something that I know will likely turn out sloppily done and cheap-looking. Forcing 3D on something for no other reason than "BUT IT'S 3D!" is pure idiocy. It should only be used extremely sparingly, preferably never at all, and to tell the story. There is immersive, then there is ****ing distracting.
 
Dude...Kraken fight...3D.

Why are guys complaining? It's not like this would've been deep anyway.
 
As long as it's done without resorting to cheap 3-D shots to scare or just stick a couple of swords, lances, etc out of the screen, I'm all for it. They did a good balanced job with Avatar on 3-D. They can do the same with Clash.
 
Dude...Kraken fight...3D.

Why are guys complaining? It's not like this would've been deep anyway.

For me it has nothing to do with the movie being deep or not. I just don't think a lot of films actually "need" to be in 3D. It can be a pain having to wear the glasses throughout the film. Not to mention, as said a number of times in the past, it dims the movie quite a bit. Film looks darker and colors aren't as vibrant.
 
As long as it's done without resorting to cheap 3-D shots to scare or just stick a couple of swords, lances, etc out of the screen, I'm all for it. They did a good balanced job with Avatar on 3-D. They can do the same with Clash.
but they decided to do the 3D after the movie was filmed.
what you are talking is how the director wants the shots. you can not do this on the computer.
 
As long as it's done without resorting to cheap 3-D shots to scare or just stick a couple of swords, lances, etc out of the screen, I'm all for it. They did a good balanced job with Avatar on 3-D. They can do the same with Clash.

There are gonna be shots of stuff flying outta the screen. Leterrier explained this in an interview by saying that because this film was not shot with 3D in mind, he could have dynamic shots of monsters and swords flying around everywhere but now that this is being converted into 3D, the normal shots for 2D film will look like they were made only as a gimmick for 3D when they weren't.

But I am gonna watch this in 3D anyway. It isn't as if they are forcing 3D, there is gonna be a 2D release so you have a choice of what version you see. I think it is gonna be pretty cool seeing Leterrier's dynamic and kinetic camera style in 3D.
 
As long as it's "In" style 3D (Avatar style depth) and not gimmicky "Out" style 3D (My Bloody Valentine, upcoming Alice in Wonderland.
 
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"