I agree. Clerks is over-rated.kainedamo said:I watched Clerks for the first time. Oh man, what a boring film. I don't understand where all the hype for this movie comes from. The rest of his movies are a massive improvement over this. The movie is one boring conversation after another. The crap that they are talking about is so mundane and crap. And the way they say things too. There's a scene with 3 guys talking, and everytime one guy finishes talking, the next guy says a line, then the other guy, it's so... what's the word... false. Yeah. Alot of the dialogue was so false to me. It must have taken Kevin Smith forever to write this movie, with such awkward dialogue. Every character thinks he's a wise ass. There's a scene where an old man is talking about tabloids, and out of absolutely nowhere one of the main characters spits in his face. The old guy runs out of the shop, and the guy spends the next 5 minutes explaining why he did it, as if it was some clever point. What a completely *******-ish thing to do. Really not funny at all.
The movie did have some funny moments. The scene where the video shop guy says "I don't appreciate your ruse" made me chuckle. But by and large, I was bored and frustrated. Each scene felt like a setup for yet another long and overdrawn joke. There are too many instances where nothing happens at all. An entire 8 seconds or so goes by as Dante serves a customer, with no words being exchanged. A hockey game insues, with takes up about 5 minutes of nothingness. I found it hard to pay attention afer awhile. I looked at the runtime, and sighed deeply as I realised the flick was only half way through.
Just what is meant to be so good about this movie? Bad acting, which I wouldn't have minded so much if the dialogue was more interesting. Cheap camera work. It just felt so mundane. It feels like watching co workers chat, and not being involved in the conversation, and what they're talking about is rubbish anyway.
Avoid if you're intelligent.
Again, so what? The thread is about Kevin Smith and his movie Clerks. The fact that Tarantino also makes films with pop culture references means nothing. Just because two filmmakers both make films with similar elements doesn't mean that because one may make consistently good films, that the other must as well.Movies205 said:Because there in the same category and I bet he loves QT, it's just an interesting point to make, who cares that he doesn't like Clerks?
sithgoblin said:Again, so what? The thread is about Kevin Smith and his movie Clerks. The fact that Tarantino also makes films with pop culture references means nothing. Just because two filmmakers both make films with similar elements doesn't mean that because one may make consistently good films, that the other must as well.
That's like saying James Cameron and Ridley Scott both made good Alien movies, so therefore, Paul W.S. Anderson must be a great filmmaker too.
"The kinds of movies Tarantino makes" has no relevance in a discussion about the merits/demerits of a Kevin Smith movie.
His post is about the film Clerks. He didn't say "Clerks sucked, so therefore, movies about movies suck". He said "Clerks sucked".Movies205 said:Disagree, there both popular for the same reason which is there movies are movies about movies, it's only a singular point in the fact that you might not like Kevin Smith, but hte reason people do is for that reason, and on the same token that's the reason why people like QT, so it's just interesting since he probably likes QT. So there I do believe that makes my post relevant
kainedamo said:I watched Clerks for the first time. Oh man, what a boring film. I don't understand where all the hype for this movie comes from. The rest of his movies are a massive improvement over this. The movie is one boring conversation after another. The crap that they are talking about is so mundane and crap. And the way they say things too. There's a scene with 3 guys talking, and everytime one guy finishes talking, the next guy says a line, then the other guy, it's so... what's the word... false. Yeah. Alot of the dialogue was so false to me. It must have taken Kevin Smith forever to write this movie, with such awkward dialogue. Every character thinks he's a wise ass. There's a scene where an old man is talking about tabloids, and out of absolutely nowhere one of the main characters spits in his face. The old guy runs out of the shop, and the guy spends the next 5 minutes explaining why he did it, as if it was some clever point. What a completely *******-ish thing to do. Really not funny at all.
The movie did have some funny moments. The scene where the video shop guy says "I don't appreciate your ruse" made me chuckle. But by and large, I was bored and frustrated. Each scene felt like a setup for yet another long and overdrawn joke. There are too many instances where nothing happens at all. An entire 8 seconds or so goes by as Dante serves a customer, with no words being exchanged. A hockey game insues, with takes up about 5 minutes of nothingness. I found it hard to pay attention afer awhile. I looked at the runtime, and sighed deeply as I realised the flick was only half way through.
Just what is meant to be so good about this movie? Bad acting, which I wouldn't have minded so much if the dialogue was more interesting. Cheap camera work. It just felt so mundane. It feels like watching co workers chat, and not being involved in the conversation, and what they're talking about is rubbish anyway.
Avoid if you're intelligent.
Movies205 said:Heh, if you don't see my point you haven't seen many movies or haven't read much about film, in either case it'd be futile to argue my point.
Shuley said:Clerks was the runaway hit at the sundance film festival when it came out.I went to see Scary Movie 4 and the preview came on,after the preview,I was the only one jumping in his seat.The I remember that the 1st clerks came out when the audiance was in diapers cause it was all teenagers.The don'[t get it.Smith is known for his dialogue skills.Great dialogue can make the movie,clerks is proof of that as was with Pulp Fiction.
WOLVERINE25TH said:I had seen Dogma and Jay & Silent Bob first, which inspired me to see Clerks when it was on th' cable rotation around here. So, I did, and I gotta say, it did suck. Sorry, but I failed to see what was so great about it. After an hour in I just had to turn it off, couldn't make it to th' end. It wasn't funny, it wasn't even interestin'. Th' later movies are by far much better.
And don't give me no Tarentino ****; I have no interest in any of his movies and I can care less what he does or who he does it. And I got sick of my film class constantly usin' Pulp Fiction as examples fer stuff.
CConn said:For some reason it seems like half of the Clerks fans' arguments defending it are as stupid as the people who hate it's. Maybe it's cause I personally don't think Clerks is fantastically great, or maybe it's just an example in the decline of our society and the intelligence in today's young people.
Evil Dead budget in 1980whateveritwas - $350,000kainedamo said:I also like how people are bringing up the fact that Kevin Smith made the movie for a low budget. Who cares?? Look at Evil Dead. Now that is something to be impressed with. What Sam Raimi did with that movie was amazing.
kainedamo said:I also like how people are bringing up the fact that Kevin Smith made the movie for a low budget. Who cares?? Look at Evil Dead. Now that is something to be impressed with. What Sam Raimi did with that movie was amazing.
Except he didn't bash the Catholic religion. Poked fun in places, sure, but it was far from bashing.thealiasman2000 said:I'm against Kevin Smith on principle. One word: "Dogma".
Kevin Smith has no bussiness bashinbg the Catholic religion.