ConFOURmed: every thing we know so far...

qj6O3Px.jpg
 
Ah, the one existing set photo

It doesn't even look like a set photo but just a bunch of people standing around in the street. No filming crews or actors. Nothing. Anyone can take a street picture and pass it off as a set pic if that's meant to be one.
 
"Baxter Institute" on a building in Baton Rouge. Pretty sure it's a set photo.
 
Me and this thread:
Y5invC7.gif

LOL same for me!

Nothing about this film gives me Fantastic Four vibes. It's just the name slapped on a low budget project. It's primary goal is to retain the rights and it's plain as day. So I can't take anyone claiming to be a F4 Fan seriously who's still defending this inferior reboot at this point.

Most can see the forest for the trees yet there's some who are swimming against the current just because it's there. Never mind all the evidence making this a bad investment for movie goers....
 
Nothing about this film gives me Fantastic Four vibes.

This is exactly it for me. There aren't a lot of things that we can say are truly 'known', but those that are, aren't the FF.

Cast - not FF
Domeshev - not FF
Baxter Institute - not FF
Containment Suits - not FF
Josh Trank - hasn't directed any films like FF
Leaked photo of Doom - DEFINITELY not FF
Grounded and gritty - not FF

Ultimate FF, maybe (but I'm not even sure about that), but Ultimate FF isn't FF and I never would have become a Fantastic Four fan if the FF was defined by Ultimate FF.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"