Thing is, Zemo is a team player, he always has been. He needs to have suborbinates.^Probably nobody.
I know this is probably just a dream, but I hope that Zemo will be forced aside early-on as well, letting the true conflict in the story be the tension between the heroes. If you leave him in there as the main force that needs to be taken down, the climax will literally be a rehash of what we have seen too many times before: all of the Avengers hunting down one guy while fighting his army of disposable, useless mooks.
Remember the opening of AoU? The Avengers cut through Hydra like it was butter. If you have one antagonist who is not that much more physically powerful and unique than Red Skull, the climax will probably go as listed: Avengers unite, Avengers split and take down tons of henchmen made of paper, one lone Avengers tracks down Zemo and beats the f*** out of him for a few seconds while he tries to fight back but cant before either killing him or having him arrested.
On the other hand, if the true final battle ends up being a huge war between both Avengers factions, then that is a new concept that the MCU has never included before, and it would be fresh while amazing at the same time.
Ugh, already been there done that! We need fresher ideas!And I fully expect that the movie will conclude with the dueling factions forced to unite against Zemo
Is this a rumor for this film or something? I haven't heard anything about this.and what I hope will be a Masters of Evil team they've been keeping under wraps, made up of the likes of Abomination and Yellowjacket (if Cross makes it out of Ant-man alive).
Why so?I highly doubt the final climax will be hero vs. hero.
Whiplash isn't dead either
I am not expecting anything of that sort; I am simply stating that it would be nice if that was the case due to originality reasons, and the fact that it would be much more exciting to see than just a tiny-a$$, 30 second punch-out with Zemo.I too am expecting the climax to be hero vs hero. It just makes sense with the Civil War title.
Really? Where was that revealed? Coulda sworn he got blown up.
^And then we see Coulson clearly get impaled straight through the back by Loki's scepter, with Marvel bringing him back without explanation. So maybe they might use ambiguity to bring villains like Whiplash back, but they sure as hell have no explanation for Coulson's return!
Oh well I tried watching it once but it bored me to tears, sorry AoS fanboys...
I'm no AoS fangirl, but I've causally followed along with the general storylines.
Fury brought Coulson back using Project TAHITI, surgery paired with the injection of alien blood. They implanted false memories of Tahiti into Coulson's mind so he wouldn't remember his resurrection. That's the general gist.
Yes, that is very cliche. But if they do, as long as it's done with a spin and a fresh take.And I fully expect that the movie will conclude with the dueling factions forced to unite against
Sometimes, there's nothing wrong with a cliche as long as it's fun and executed well.
Then Crossbones is just the opening villain then. I'm cool with that
Yes, that is very cliche. But if they do, as long as it's done with a spin and a fresh take.
Exactly.Sometimes, there's nothing wrong with a cliche as long as it's fun and executed well.
We don't know that. Movies are not filmed in sequential order as they will appear on screen.