Senator Pleasury
Sidekick
- Joined
- May 26, 2013
- Messages
- 2,844
- Reaction score
- 5
- Points
- 31
BTW, who's playing the monster?
Oh, who cares?
Joking, joking, I don't know. They don't have a name yet on IMDB.
BTW, who's playing the monster?
Goosebumps of horror all over my skin now.
I like Radcliffe's choices of roles. Also I like the "Joker" coat
I think for Radcliffe it's a natural fit coming off of Harry Potter. Those are all in the same element of fantasy with increasing amounts of horror in them. Harry Potter got pretty dark by the end with Deathly Hallows although it wasn't horror.May I say though, that I am very surprised and delighted by Daniel Radcliffe's sudden obsession with doing Horror movies exclusively now?
The Woman in Black
Horns
Frankenstein
Agree with youI think for Radcliffe it's a natural fit coming off of Harry Potter. Those are all in the same element of fantasy with increasing amounts of horror in them. Harry Potter got pretty dark by the end with Deathly Hallows although it wasn't horror.
he has a perfect face for horror movies. so i am happyMay I say though, that I am very surprised and delighted by Daniel Radcliffe's sudden obsession with doing Horror movies exclusively now?
n
I think for Radcliffe it's a natural fit coming off of Harry Potter. Those are all in the same element of fantasy with increasing amounts of horror in them. Harry Potter got pretty dark by the end with Deathly Hallows although it wasn't horror.
Radcliffe with that hair kinda looks like a young Robert Carlyle.
Perri Nemiroff said:When asked how Victor Frankenstein will stand out amongst all of the other Frankenstein projects in the works, Radcliffe replied:
Radcliffe also explained how Frankensteins monster fits in:I think our Frankenstein is a really kind of rip-roaring, fun adventure movie version of Frankenstein. I would really struggle to class it as horror. I think there are horror elements to it and nods to previous versions of Frankenstein, but its much more a film about the thing that I hope will make it stand out is the relationship between James character and I. Victor and Igor are two people who come to need each other very much. The thing for me of the movie is actually about creation and, you know, Igor, my character, is taken out of this horrible abused life at the beginning of the movie and James sort of saves him and gives him this new life, sort of creating him in some sense, in creating this life that he has, and so because of that and because of the life hes been saved from, Igor feels forever that he has this sort of debt of loyalty and the film then becomes about how much can that debt be pushed? How much can that loyalty be pushed before at what point do you have to step out from the shadows of the person that created you and go, I am my own person? Or, do you forever defer to the person that is responsible for your life? So its sort of, its a film about relationships set against the backdrop of creating monsters.
One of the biggest differences between us and other Frankensteins will be that, generally speaking, the main relationship is between Frankenstein and the monster and the monster is created in the middle of the movie, and in our version its created right at the end and the journey up to that is really about how we come to that eventual idea. Ive heard other people call it kind of an origin story for Frankenstein, but its an origin story for a Frankenstein you have never met before, if that helps. The quote that I got in trouble with with the producers was saying, If you like the book, youll hate the movie. [Laughs]
I might be biased, but I prefer the Penny Dreadful version.