The Phantom
Dredknight
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2005
- Messages
- 1,573
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
So did Roger Moore in a plenty of his movies.Sava said:i agree Brosnan did look a bit old in DAD![]()
So did Roger Moore in a plenty of his movies.Sava said:i agree Brosnan did look a bit old in DAD![]()
The Phantom said:So did Roger Moore in a plenty of his movies.
hunter rider said:Daniel Craig as James Bond.[/size]
![]()
Finally, Contact Music spoke with actor Colin Salmon, who played MI6 staff member Charles Robinson in the Pierce Brosnan films. Salmon doesn't hold out hope for returning for Casino Royale (neither Q nor Miss Moneypenny will appear in the film, although M will). "I imagine they will be assembling a new cast," Salmon said. "I'm also not sure how well my character would translate. He's very straight and I think they need to change the whole format."
Casino Royale begins filming in January.
regwec said:We better get a male 'M', or I will urinate in a public mail box.
ROBOCOP CPU001 said:get pissing.
Dame judi dench is coming back.
Steelsheen said:alright now i'm confused.
i thought Casino Royale was like a "prequel"-- hence younger Bond, no Q, no Money Penny, the whole ball of wax? hence M should be a man right? even in the Bond movies Dame Judi' character acknowledged that she's new and that she'll try her best to do as good a job as her (male) predecessor.
Kevin Roegele said:Moore could get away with it, because most of the time he played the role tongue in cheek. The only exceptions are in For Your Eyes Only, in which it is acknoledged he's getting older and he's a bit more serious, and in A View to a Kill.
Everyman said:In FYEO, his age worked fine, but in A View to Kill, it simply looked ridiculous, especially the way he was getting on with the ladies.
Doc Ock said:Exactly.
Bond and Moneypenny were ancient in A View to a Kill.It was ridiculous.
regwec said:Craig is the best casting choice since Connery.
Although it is true that he doesn't resemble what people have come to expect from a James Bond, that is in fact what makes him so right. Roger Moore, George Lazenby, Timothy Dalton and Pierce Brosnan have all been the fruits of MGM's attempts to find someone a bit like Sean Connery. Or at least someone with dark hair. That's about the only thing that they have in common with each other.
Daniel Craig has the potential to be to Bond what Bale has been to Batman. He fits the Bond of literature better. Craig looks like a fighter. He looks like someone who has had a career in the military before joining the secret service- as Bond should. I really hope that the producers are serious about returning Bond to his cold, sadistic roots. I hope they finally give him the 3" scar on his cheek he was always supposed to have.
Sure, I want them to keep the class and sophistication (though I would like to point out that the James Bond of the novels drinks Krug champagne as often as vulgar Vodka Martinis), and maybe I would even prefer them to stick a little die in Craig's hair. But the potential here to rejuvinate the franchise from a campy-sci fi-sex-farce and back into a gritty, character driven spy thriller is huge.