• The upgrade to XenForo 2.3.7 has now been completed. Please report any issues to our administrators.

Daniel Craig confirmed as new James Bond

we now have an ugly cockney villain in the lead,well done EON:up:

Lol, cockney villain? Some people's ignorance ASTOUNDS me :wow:

Thankyou Hunter, your rich and thoughtful insights were a pleasure to behold.
 
Maybe its just me, but I don't want a cold, dark, sadistic Bond. I like the Bond of the movies. The suave ladies man, who never gets shaken, always keeps his cool, is very professional, but also to an extent has fun with his work. I mean, sure the books are great but Bond of film and Bond of literature are two different things.

And they still are two different things. The Casino movie only took one or two elements from the book, imo, but it managed to take the most important ones.

As for what you want, fair point. But then again you do have about 15 or 16 other Bond films which you can re-watch, if as you say, you really do want the same formula that has served the franchise for 40 odd years.

Personally i see no point in doing the same thing that has been done for 40 years. What is the point? Besides, this film had plenty of classic Bond humour/action.


At anyrate, I think the market is oversaturated with dark, disturbed, anti heroes.

And they are all so much more interesting and relatable to than Superman.
 
Erm, they were definatley not sensical. Sure you can say he may not look the part(nor did Brosnan bar the black hair), but calling him a 'cockney villain'? That was ever so slightly ******ed, but oh well it's in the past it doesn't matter anymore.

And just so you know, no wit was actually attempted in said post. Nice try though.
 
You've clearly never seen Eastenders otherwise you would get the point,he looks just like Phil Mitchell's business associates:yay: and given your lousy record i'd edit out ******ed if i was you:o

As for the rest i don't need to try b/c it was obvious,trying to get out of it though is tacky:csad:
 
Trying to get out of what? lol. Look sparky, as i said i wasn't trying to be witty, i was being sarcastic. But the fact that you have to highlight the most irrelevant sentence to legitamise your plainly ignorant posts is amusing to me nontheless.

It's okay if you feel the need to cover yourself, being a MOD and all, i understand :)

But as i said, it's in the past and doesn't really matter.
 
there you go again trying to be slick and failing,if you can't comprehend points it's cool as you say it doesn't matter it's in the past
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,263
Messages
22,074,608
Members
45,875
Latest member
kedenlewis
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"