DAREDEVIL 2?!....MCD on king pin

how is the DC better than a sequel?


id like a sequel!..
 
Maybe one day if the Daredevil film rights revert back to Marvel then maybe they could possibly take the characters to Sony & we can get the Daredevil/Spider-Man cross over film like MCD talked about.
 
maybe...... but i cant imagine DD with peter.

only the king pin
 
heh....his story idea for DD2 is for kingpin to go on a diet?
 
I would love to sidekick Tobey Maguire and then punch Ben Affleck right in the face. (Laughs) Maybe one day.

LOL!
 
MCD talks more about his weight than about the character. There is no real indication that the Kingpin would be done right. So the Kingpin will work out in prison and loose weight? Good for him. But I don't really care.
 
Everyman said:
MCD talks more about his weight than about the character. There is no real indication that the Kingpin would be done right. So the Kingpin will work out in prison and loose weight? Good for him. But I don't really care.
jesus christ.......whats your problem?:confused:
 
If only Marvel would get the rights back...I'd love a Daredevil sequel.
 
xwolverine2 said:
jesus christ.......whats your problem?:confused:

I have no problem, there is just nothing in this interview about a DD sequel that is worthy of interest. The guy asks MCD about the sequel, MCD talks about his weight. Not about how serious the sequel rumour is (as far as he knows), not about the character of the Kingpin and where he could go from the first movie as a character, but about his weight, and the Kingpin training in prison. MCD seems to think about Wilson Fisk only in cosmetic/trivial terms. I would like to see a sequel to DD, especially if it is superior to the first movie, but this interview raises doubts about MCD's capacity to create a believable Wilson Fisk/Kingpin, even if the script was any better than the script of the first one.
 
I think you're reading a bit too deeply into it. I'm not surprised in the least an actor wouldn't be very knowledgable about his character's motivations in a film that doesn't even have a script written for it.
 
CConn said:
I think you're reading a bit too deeply into it. I'm not surprised in the least an actor wouldn't be very knowledgable about his character's motivations in a film that doesn't even have a script written for it.

He could talk about what he thinks of the character and where he thinks he can lead him from the first movie. You don't need a script to do that. It seems all MCD can think of when you talk about the Kingpin is his weight (his own or Fisk's) and workout.
 
That Mark Steven Johnson guy is simply not a good director.

Maybe Affleck could direct the sequel if his Boston movie turns out to be good.
 
BT18 said:
That Mark Steven Johnson guy is simply not a good director.

Maybe Affleck could direct the sequel if his Boston movie turns out to be good.

I doubt Affleck is any good as a director, he is a mediocre actor at best and he is way too narcissic. But yes, MSJ is a bad director, and the script of the first DD was terrible and filled with incoherences and plotholes, which didn't help.
 
Everyman said:
I doubt Affleck is any good as a director, he is a mediocre actor at best and he is way too narcissic. But yes, MSJ is a bad director, and the script of the first DD was terrible and filled with incoherences and plotholes, which didn't help.

Ghost Rider looks good though. The Directors Cut of DD was way better than the theatrical version we received.
 
MSJ is a great director.... how was DD bad? it stayed as close to the comics as spidey did.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
201,153
Messages
21,907,340
Members
45,704
Latest member
BMD
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"