GuestStar2004
Avenger
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2004
- Messages
- 23,861
- Reaction score
- 1,722
- Points
- 103
* Singer's statements about not ignoring the events of previous films and about this film showing how certain characters the people we know from previous films
and he isn't X1,X2,X3, the wolverine still link up to DOFP, technically as a prequel, he hasn't ignored X3 and had cyclops and jean involved
* Kinberg's statements about the film showing how certain characters became who they are in the other movies, about when X-Men Apocalypse will take place, and about how this film will lead to things that happen in Apocalypse
truth is that this is X-Men they have to go that direction anyway, and the OT characters were them characters already, they can still become them characters in apocalypse doesn't mean everything has to link up
* The film going out of its way to establish concrete links to/fixes for things from previous films that fans consider to be inconsistencies (Xavier walking in OW and the flashback in TLS and Hank appearing in human form in a cameo in X2)
is that the case though? say if xavier goes back in the chair by the end of DOFP? and isn't walking in the 80s? does that still count?
* Statements from Lauren Shuler Donner about things she wants to see them do with the franchise in the future
donner has said alot of things, mystique solo spin off with lawrence
* The fact that they have greenlit a sequel to the furthest-set complete film in the timeline, The Wolverine
sequel in new timeline? i fail to see how or why this has to keep the other films in continuity for that work
* Statements that have been made about the in-development X-Force
not related to this film
* Statements from Patrick Stewart, Lauren Shuler Donner, Bryan Singer, Simon Kinberg, and others about possible future appearances from the OT cast members
set in new timeline? i fail to see how or why this has to keep the other films in continuity for that work